Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,335 studies31 sourcesUpdated 7 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCNeurogastroenterology and motility

Methods and Techniques for Closed-Loop Gastrointestinal Pacing.

  1. 1Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  2. 2Riddet Institute Centre of Research Excellence, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Abstract

Purpose

Gastrointestinal slow waves are rhythmic electrical events that contribute to the coordination of motility. Functional motility disorders such as gastroparesis are linked to abnormal slow wave activity, and current treatments do not target the underlying electrical dysfunction. Gastrointestinal electrical pacing restores normal rhythms, but open-loop pacing lacks adaptation to underlying slow wave activity, leading to reduced energy efficiency and potential overstimulation.Methods

A novel closed-loop pacing system was developed to detect gastric and intestinal slow waves and dynamically pace in response to the underlying rhythm. High-resolution electrode arrays were placed on the serosal surface of anesthetized pigs for simultaneous pacing and mapping. The control strategy comprised two steps: (i) continuous detection and classification of slow waves as normal rhythm (stomach: 15-25 s; small intestine: 3-5 s) or abnormal rhythm; and (ii) pacing delivery and entrainment assessment, with pulses (100-400 ms, 3-8 mA) triggered by abnormal rhythms or failed entrainment.Results

Detection of slow wave events achieved an accuracy of 78% for both the stomach and the small intestine. Entrainment detection yielded an accuracy of 73% for the stomach and 67% for the small intestine. Closed-loop pacing successfully restored abnormal gastric and small intestinal slow wave periods to normal physiological ranges and reduced the number of pulses delivered by 60% compared to open-loop pacing.Conclusion

Closed-loop pacing significantly reduced pulse delivery, demonstrating the feasibility of a targeted, adaptive approach that may reduce pacing burden, although effects on motility and gastric emptying warrant further investigation.

Related

  1. Closed Versus Open Vent Port Techniques and the Disconnection Technique for Optimizing Lung Collapse With Bronchial Blockers in Video‐Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Juan Yao, Ya‐Jing Chen, Fang‐Ming Shen +6
    The clinical respiratory journalPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. AI-driven quality enhancement of medical datasets: a closed-loop framework of synthesis, annotation, quality control, and integration
    Tao Tian, Siyuan Zhang, Xuchen Yang +1
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Brain-computer interfaces for neurodegenerative diseases: A comprehensive review of closed-loop systems from diagnosis to neural rehabilitation
    Qingyang Shan, Jiaqi Li, Yi Wang +5
    iSciencePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0NeurologyCell PressCrossref
  4. Barrier and no-touch techniques in gastrointestinal surgery: a best evidence summary
    Qingqing Du, Hailei Bian, Shan Wu +2
    Frontiers in SurgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMCEurope PMC
  5. Response to comments on “Robotic surgical techniques and methods for treating renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus”
    Jin Luo, Cheng Peng, Baojun Wang
    Current UrologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
BibTeX
@article{weerakoon2026methods,
  title = {{Methods and Techniques for Closed-Loop Gastrointestinal Pacing.}},
  author = {Chaveeka Weerakoon and Leo K Cheng and Peng Du and Niranchan Paskaranandavadivel and Nipuni D Nagahawatte},
  journal = {Neurogastroenterology and motility},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1111/nmo.70467},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42897696},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Methods and Techniques for Closed-Loop Gastrointestinal Pacing.
AU  - Chaveeka Weerakoon
AU  - Leo K Cheng
AU  - Peng Du
AU  - Niranchan Paskaranandavadivel
AU  - Nipuni D Nagahawatte
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Neurogastroenterology and motility
DO  - 10.1111/nmo.70467
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42897696
AB  - Purpose  Gastrointestinal slow waves are rhythmic electrical events that contribute to the coordination of motility. Functional motility disorders such as gastroparesis are linked to abnormal slow wave activity, and current treatments do not target the underlying electrical dysfunction. Gastrointestinal electrical pacing restores normal rhythms, but open-loop pacing lacks adaptation to underlying slow wave activity, leading to reduced energy efficiency and potential overstimulation.Methods  A novel closed-loop pacing system was developed to detect gastric and intestinal slow waves and dynamically pace in response to the underlying rhythm. High-resolution electrode arrays were placed on the serosal surface of anesthetized pigs for simultaneous pacing and mapping. The control strategy comprised two steps: (i) continuous detection and classification of slow waves as normal rhythm (stomach: 15-25 s; small intestine: 3-5 s) or abnormal rhythm; and (ii) pacing delivery and entrainment assessment, with pulses (100-400 ms, 3-8 mA) triggered by abnormal rhythms or failed entrainment.Results  Detection of slow wave events achieved an accuracy of 78% for both the stomach and the small intestine. Entrainment detection yielded an accuracy of 73% for the stomach and 67% for the small intestine. Closed-loop pacing successfully restored abnormal gastric and small intestinal slow wave periods to normal physiological ranges and reduced the number of pulses delivered by 60% compared to open-loop pacing.Conclusion  Closed-loop pacing significantly reduced pulse delivery, demonstrating the feasibility of a targeted, adaptive approach that may reduce pacing burden, although effects on motility and gastric emptying warrant further investigation.
SN  - 1350-1925
SN  - 1365-2982
ER  -