Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 24 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0PsyArXiv

Objective Neurocognitive Assessment of Stress and Recovery in Military Personnel: The NPRO-8 MIL Two-Tier Screening Framework

Abstract

Prolonged military deployments expose personnel to sustained vigilance, disrupted sleep, uncertainty, repeated high-consequence decisions, separation from social support, and restricted opportunities for recovery. Military organizations routinely monitor physical fitness and medical readiness, but stress-related neurocognitive functioning remains assessed primarily through self-report, observation, performance outcomes, and clinical contact. These sources are indispensable, yet they may not reveal the physiological effort required to maintain performance or the capacity to recover after cognitive demand. This paper introduces NPRO-8 MIL, a military adaptation of the NPRO-8 Core mental-fitness screening framework. NPRO-8 MIL combines behavioral performance with functional near-infrared spectroscopy during five structured cognitive task modules. Eight NeuroProbes inform three higher-order pillars: Stress Load, Recovery Capacity, and Functional Impact. The underlying NPRO-8 Core has completed internal validation through 178 deterministic tests, 32,000 Monte Carlo examinations, 50,850 repeated robustness classifications, and parameter-sensitivity analyses. These findings establish computational coherence and predictable behavior, while prospective military reliability, external-validity, and predictive-validity studies remain necessary. Because fNIRS cannot feasibly be administered to every member of a large military population, a two-tier pathway is proposed: brief population-level digital screening followed by targeted NPRO-8 MIL assessment. Ethical safeguards addressing voluntariness, privacy, command access, purpose limitation, and protection from unauthorized selection or disciplinary use are integral to the framework. NPRO-8 MIL is presented as a screening and longitudinal monitoring approach, not a psychiatric diagnostic or autonomous fitness-for-duty instrument.

Related

  1. JassidNet as a quantization-aware lightweight phenotyping framework for high-throughput cotton jassid (Amrasca biguttula) detection and counting toward objective resistance screening
    Rui-Feng Wang, Kangning Cui, Iago Beffart Schardong +9
    Industrial Crops and ProductsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND13 citedPlant biologyOpenAlex
  2. Perceived temporal acceleration across the lifespan: An integrative framework of mathematical, neurocognitive, emotional, and behavioral mechanisms
    Syed Rizvi, Marcos Sanchez-Gonzalez, Erick Perez-Flores +1
    Journal of Preventive and Complementary MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textNeuroscienceDOAJ
  3. Toward an Objective Assessment of Fight-or-Flight System Function in Anxiety Disorders: Startle Reflex Modulation in Threat Coping Contexts as a Candidate Neurophysiological Marker of Disrupted Defense System Operation
    J. H. Gertler, C. Marsicano, M. S. George +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  4. Occurrence and Dietary Exposure Assessment of Patulin and Major Alternaria Toxins in Commercial Infant Fruit Purées from Italian and Spanish Markets Using Targeted Analysis and Suspect Screening.
    Enrico Pambianco, Octavian Augustin Mihalache, Chiara Dall'Asta +2
    ToxinsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyEurope PMC
  5. Instruments and scales for assessment, screening, and psychoeducational diagnosis of children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: a scoping review.
    Kleonara Santos Oliveira, Denise Brandão de Oliveira E Britto, Graziela Nunes Alfenas Fernandes +1
    Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao PauloPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{rotgans2026objective,
  title = {{Objective Neurocognitive Assessment of Stress and Recovery in Military Personnel: The NPRO-8 MIL Two-Tier Screening Framework}},
  author = {Jerome I. Rotgans},
  howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.31234/osf.io/4gbke_v1},
  url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/4gbke_v1/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Objective Neurocognitive Assessment of Stress and Recovery in Military Personnel: The NPRO-8 MIL Two-Tier Screening Framework
AU  - Jerome I. Rotgans
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/04
PB  - PsyArXiv
DO  - 10.31234/osf.io/4gbke_v1
UR  - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/4gbke_v1/
AB  - Prolonged military deployments expose personnel to sustained vigilance, disrupted sleep, uncertainty, repeated high-consequence decisions, separation from social support, and restricted opportunities for recovery. Military organizations routinely monitor physical fitness and medical readiness, but stress-related neurocognitive functioning remains assessed primarily through self-report, observation, performance outcomes, and clinical contact. These sources are indispensable, yet they may not reveal the physiological effort required to maintain performance or the capacity to recover after cognitive demand. This paper introduces NPRO-8 MIL, a military adaptation of the NPRO-8 Core mental-fitness screening framework. NPRO-8 MIL combines behavioral performance with functional near-infrared spectroscopy during five structured cognitive task modules. Eight NeuroProbes inform three higher-order pillars: Stress Load, Recovery Capacity, and Functional Impact. The underlying NPRO-8 Core has completed internal validation through 178 deterministic tests, 32,000 Monte Carlo examinations, 50,850 repeated robustness classifications, and parameter-sensitivity analyses. These findings establish computational coherence and predictable behavior, while prospective military reliability, external-validity, and predictive-validity studies remain necessary. Because fNIRS cannot feasibly be administered to every member of a large military population, a two-tier pathway is proposed: brief population-level digital screening followed by targeted NPRO-8 MIL assessment. Ethical safeguards addressing voluntariness, privacy, command access, purpose limitation, and protection from unauthorized selection or disciplinary use are integral to the framework. NPRO-8 MIL is presented as a screening and longitudinal monitoring approach, not a psychiatric diagnostic or autonomous fitness-for-duty instrument.
ER  -