Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 13 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Discover Artificial Intelligence

Machine learning surrogate modeling with quantile adjustment for landing gear surface pressure fluctuation prediction

  1. 1Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G8 Canada

Abstract

Many engineering datasets are difficult for machine-learning surrogate modeling because the selected features are informative but insufficient, and the response distribution is often biased toward noncritical regions. This paper investigates that issue through an aeroacoustic case study in which limited steady-state flow variables are used to predict a transient hotspot-dominated landing-gear noise field. Multiple regression-based surrogate models are benchmarked, including functional, neural, boosting-based, and decision-tree-based methods. The results show that conventional Random Forest outperforms more advanced boosting and deep tabular models, indicating that model suitability depends strongly on how the learning characteristics match the available feature information and response structure. The study also shows that when a baseline predictor captures the overall response trend but systematically underestimates peaks, an upper quantile can serve as an effective bias-adjustment strategy to improve hotspot prediction.

Related

  1. Mechanism-informed dynamic surrogate modeling for rapid thermal-aberration prediction in bonded optical systems
    Yuxi Zhao, Huanxiong Xia, Xiumin Zhang +1
    Optics ExpressPeer-reviewedPublisher termsOptics & photonicsCrossref
  2. Synthetic Dataset Generation, Physical Consistency and Active Learning for Shape-Informed Surrogate Modeling of Hemodynamics
    Francesco Romor, Richard Schussnig, Charles A. Taylor +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textFluid dynamicsarXiv
  3. A hybrid GAN-CNN surrogate framework for wave-structure interaction: Coupled prediction of free-surface fields and hydrodynamic forces
    Ali Mahdi, Julien Réveillon, Benjamin Duret +1
    Ocean EngineeringPeer-reviewedLicence not statedStatistical & nonlinear physicsHAL
  4. Physics-constrained neural networks for surrogate modeling of lossless periodic structures
    Eric Prehn, Peter Jung
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptics & photonicsarXiv
  5. A hierarchy of physics-embedded neural operators for structural dynamic surrogate modelingA hierarchy of physics-embedded neural operators for structural dynamic surrogate modeling
    Amir Ansrollahi, Mehmet Sefa Orak
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textMathematical physicsComputational physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@article{cheng2026machine,
  title = {{Machine learning surrogate modeling with quantile adjustment for landing gear surface pressure fluctuation prediction}},
  author = {Zeyuan Cheng and Kamran Behdinan},
  journal = {Discover Artificial Intelligence},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1007/s44163-026-02600-6},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-026-02600-6},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Machine learning surrogate modeling with quantile adjustment for landing gear surface pressure fluctuation prediction
AU  - Zeyuan Cheng
AU  - Kamran Behdinan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/25
JO  - Discover Artificial Intelligence
DO  - 10.1007/s44163-026-02600-6
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-026-02600-6
AB  - Many engineering datasets are difficult for machine-learning surrogate modeling because the selected features are informative but insufficient, and the response distribution is often biased toward noncritical regions. This paper investigates that issue through an aeroacoustic case study in which limited steady-state flow variables are used to predict a transient hotspot-dominated landing-gear noise field. Multiple regression-based surrogate models are benchmarked, including functional, neural, boosting-based, and decision-tree-based methods. The results show that conventional Random Forest outperforms more advanced boosting and deep tabular models, indicating that model suitability depends strongly on how the learning characteristics match the available feature information and response structure. The study also shows that when a baseline predictor captures the overall response trend but systematically underestimates peaks, an upper quantile can serve as an effective bias-adjustment strategy to improve hotspot prediction.
SN  - 2731-0809
ER  -