Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 39 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Heterogeneous plasticity rules generate diverse structures in recurrent networks

  1. 1Technical University of Munich

Abstract

How do local changes at individual synapses give rise to structured recurrent connectivity? Experiments have revealed diverse forms of spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) across the brain, making it difficult to predict which circuit structures different rules will generate. We developed an analytical framework mapping excitatory Hebbian, anti-Hebbian, and symmetric STDP rules to directed three-neuron motifs. Individual homogeneous rules generate restricted subsets of motifs, and no single rule produces all motifs. Combining different rules generates motifs inaccessible to individual rules and yields the full motif repertoire, and these predictions generalize to larger recurrent networks. The mapping is nevertheless highly non-unique, with distinct rules and parameters producing similar motif distributions, including distributions compatible with experimental connectivity. Thus, circuit structure constrains candidate plasticity rules but does not uniquely identify them. Finally, networks with similar motif distributions can nonetheless differ in their firing rates and pairwise correlations, suggesting that activity may provide an additional constraint on candidate plasticity rules.

Related

  1. Operator-valued free probability applied to recurrent neural networks with heterogeneity in local and global circuit structures
    J. Jiang, G. Tian, B. Doiron
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  2. Correlated traits generate the structure and stability of multiplex ecological networks
    K. R. S. Hale, E. Thebault, F. S. Valdovinos
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textEcologybioRxiv
  3. Shaping Slow Manifolds in Equivariant Recurrent Neural Networks
    Arianna Di Bernardo, Adrian Valente, Francesca Mastrogiuseppe +1
    Neural ComputationPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text5 citedNeuroscienceOpenAlex
  4. Reusable modular architecture enables flexible cognitive operations in the mouse brain and artificial recurrent networks
    Yuma Osako, Greggory R. Heller, Sofie Ährlund‐Richter +2
    Nature NeurosciencePeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text6 citedNeuroscienceOpenAlex
  5. Predictive learning with local plasticity in excitatory-inhibitory networks
    H. Reis Aguiar, M. H. Hennig
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{cusseddu2026heterogeneous,
  title = {{Heterogeneous plasticity rules generate diverse structures in recurrent networks}},
  author = {C. Cusseddu and D. Festa and C. Miehl and J. Gjorgjieva},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.26.760407},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.26.760407v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Heterogeneous plasticity rules generate diverse structures in recurrent networks
AU  - C. Cusseddu
AU  - D. Festa
AU  - C. Miehl
AU  - J. Gjorgjieva
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.26.760407
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.26.760407v1
AB  - How do local changes at individual synapses give rise to structured recurrent connectivity? Experiments have revealed diverse forms of spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) across the brain, making it difficult to predict which circuit structures different rules will generate. We developed an analytical framework mapping excitatory Hebbian, anti-Hebbian, and symmetric STDP rules to directed three-neuron motifs. Individual homogeneous rules generate restricted subsets of motifs, and no single rule produces all motifs. Combining different rules generates motifs inaccessible to individual rules and yields the full motif repertoire, and these predictions generalize to larger recurrent networks. The mapping is nevertheless highly non-unique, with distinct rules and parameters producing similar motif distributions, including distributions compatible with experimental connectivity. Thus, circuit structure constrains candidate plasticity rules but does not uniquely identify them. Finally, networks with similar motif distributions can nonetheless differ in their firing rates and pairwise correlations, suggesting that activity may provide an additional constraint on candidate plasticity rules.
ER  -