Serious game-based interventions for pediatric asthma management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- 1School of Nursing, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
- 2Department of Pediatrics, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Abstract
Childhood asthma is a common chronic respiratory disease that can affect physical functioning, daily activities, and quality of life. Poor adherence and inadequate self-management remain important challenges in long-term asthma care. Serious games (SGs) combine game elements with health education, behavioral support, or rehabilitation and have been increasingly used in children with asthma. However, evidence regarding their clinical value has not been clearly established. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of SG-based interventions on pulmonary function, asthma-related knowledge, inflammatory biomarkers, healthcare utilization, engagement, adherence, and safety in children with asthma. PubMed, Scopus, Embase via Ovid, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Science Direct, SinoMed and CNKI were searched from inception to June 1, 2026. Studies examining SG-based interventions in children with asthma were eligible for inclusion. Study selection, data extraction, and methodological assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers. Pulmonary function outcomes that were sufficiently comparable across studies were pooled by meta-analysis, whereas the remaining outcomes were summarized narratively. Eight studies were included. The interventions were classified as educational/self-management SG interventions or exercise/rehabilitation SG interventions. Meta-analyses included four studies for forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), four studies for FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC), three studies for FVC, and three studies for maximal mid-expiratory flow (MMEF). Pooled analyses showed higher FVC [mean difference (MD) =4.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.14 to 8.82] and MMEF (MD =8.41, 95% CI: 6.63 to 10.19) following SG-based interventions. No statistically significant differences were found for FEV1 (MD =1.90, 95% CI: -0.97 to 4.78) or FEV1/FVC [standardized mean difference (SMD) =-0.03, 95% CI: -0.26 to 0.20]. However, the certainty of evidence was limited by the small number of studies, small sample sizes, heterogeneity among interventions, and methodological limitations. SG-based interventions may serve as a complementary approach to pediatric asthma management, particularly for selected pulmonary function outcomes and self-management-related behaviors. The finding for MMEF was relatively consistent, whereas the evidence for FVC was less robust. Interpretation is limited by the small number of available studies, small sample sizes, differences in intervention protocols, and methodological limitations. Larger, well-designed studies using standardized outcomes and longer follow-up are needed before the clinical value of SG-based interventions can be established.
Related
- Digital, Mobile and Artificial Intelligence‐Supported Interventions for Pressure Injury Prevention and Management: A Systematic Review of Clinical, Workflow and Implementation Outcomes
- Home-based non-pharmacological interventions for cognition and diabetes self-management in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review
- Comparative effectiveness of exercise and self-management interventions delivered through different modes of digital support on pain and patient-reported physical function in people with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Nursing interventions for pediatric functional constipation: a systematic review of evidence and clinical implications
- Low-Dose Atropine and Other Interventions for Pediatric Myopia: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Efficacy and Post-treatment Outcomes
BibTeX
@article{wu2026serious,
title = {{Serious game-based interventions for pediatric asthma management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.}},
author = {Liping Wu and Jia Deng and Shun Zhang and Yongqi Bai},
journal = {Translational pediatrics},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.21037/tp-2026-0710},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42996746},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Serious game-based interventions for pediatric asthma management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
AU - Liping Wu
AU - Jia Deng
AU - Shun Zhang
AU - Yongqi Bai
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/30
JO - Translational pediatrics
DO - 10.21037/tp-2026-0710
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42996746
AB - Childhood asthma is a common chronic respiratory disease that can affect physical functioning, daily activities, and quality of life. Poor adherence and inadequate self-management remain important challenges in long-term asthma care. Serious games (SGs) combine game elements with health education, behavioral support, or rehabilitation and have been increasingly used in children with asthma. However, evidence regarding their clinical value has not been clearly established. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of SG-based interventions on pulmonary function, asthma-related knowledge, inflammatory biomarkers, healthcare utilization, engagement, adherence, and safety in children with asthma. PubMed, Scopus, Embase via Ovid, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Science Direct, SinoMed and CNKI were searched from inception to June 1, 2026. Studies examining SG-based interventions in children with asthma were eligible for inclusion. Study selection, data extraction, and methodological assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers. Pulmonary function outcomes that were sufficiently comparable across studies were pooled by meta-analysis, whereas the remaining outcomes were summarized narratively. Eight studies were included. The interventions were classified as educational/self-management SG interventions or exercise/rehabilitation SG interventions. Meta-analyses included four studies for forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), four studies for FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC), three studies for FVC, and three studies for maximal mid-expiratory flow (MMEF). Pooled analyses showed higher FVC [mean difference (MD) =4.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.14 to 8.82] and MMEF (MD =8.41, 95% CI: 6.63 to 10.19) following SG-based interventions. No statistically significant differences were found for FEV1 (MD =1.90, 95% CI: -0.97 to 4.78) or FEV1/FVC [standardized mean difference (SMD) =-0.03, 95% CI: -0.26 to 0.20]. However, the certainty of evidence was limited by the small number of studies, small sample sizes, heterogeneity among interventions, and methodological limitations. SG-based interventions may serve as a complementary approach to pediatric asthma management, particularly for selected pulmonary function outcomes and self-management-related behaviors. The finding for MMEF was relatively consistent, whereas the evidence for FVC was less robust. Interpretation is limited by the small number of available studies, small sample sizes, differences in intervention protocols, and methodological limitations. Larger, well-designed studies using standardized outcomes and longer follow-up are needed before the clinical value of SG-based interventions can be established.
SN - 2224-4336
SN - 2224-4344
ER -