The Interference Index: Quantifying and Improving Error Cancellation in Machine-Learned Thermodynamic Stability Predictions
5 affiliations
- 1Department of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnology
- 2University of Perugia
- 3Dipartimento di Farmacia
- 4Università G. D’Annunzio
- 5Institute of Science and Chemical Technologies "Giulio Natta"-SCITEC, National Research Council, via Elce di Sotto, Perugia, Italy, 06123
Abstract
Machine-learned formation enthalpies for inorganic materials approach density functional theory (DFT) accuracy, yet thermodynamic stability predictions derived from them can remain unreliable, a gap commonly associated with error cancellation in DFT that independent per-compound training does not reproduce. We introduce the interference index ξ, a dimensionless measure of how strongly errors reinforce or cancel in linearly derived quantities. Its root-mean-square average, ξrms, provides a reaction-size-independent null reference, with ξrms = 1 for the isotropic null model. Across seven published models benchmarked on Materials Project compounds, error-cancellation behaviour is distinct from per-compound accuracy and becomes progressively less favourable with increasing formation-enthalpy accuracy among the compositional models. We then introduce iiLoss, a reaction-aware objective that favours cancellation of formation-enthalpy errors rather than directly minimising decomposition-enthalpy error. On Materials Project data, iiLoss reduces decomposition-enthalpy error by 21% and improves thermodynamic stability classification by 6.8% in F1 score, outperforming direct supervision on decomposition enthalpies. These results show that error cancellation can be quantified and directly optimised to improve derived thermodynamic predictions.
Related
- Model Dependence and Cancellation in a Fixed-Geometry Lactone Energy Cycle
- Embedded Morgan Fingerprints for more efficient molecular property predictions with machine learning
- Statistical predictions on the encapsulation of single molecule binding pairs into sized-dispersed nanocontainers
- Crystal structure, Hirshfeld surface analysis, computational study, molecular docking predictions and biological evaluation of a new Schiff base (E)-2-((2,4-dichlorobenzylidene)amino)aniline
- Universal Model for Atoms (UMA) in Computational Asymmetric Catalysis: Comparing Enantioselectivity Predictions
BibTeX
@misc{kanzow2026interference,
title = {{The Interference Index: Quantifying and Improving Error Cancellation in Machine-Learned Thermodynamic Stability Predictions}},
author = {Alexander Kanzow and Cesare Boriosi and Carlos R. Jacinto-Mejía and Loriano Storchi and Giovanni Bistoni},
howpublished = {ChemRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.26434/chemrxiv.15008797/v1},
url = {https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15008797/v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - The Interference Index: Quantifying and Improving Error Cancellation in Machine-Learned Thermodynamic Stability Predictions
AU - Alexander Kanzow
AU - Cesare Boriosi
AU - Carlos R. Jacinto-Mejía
AU - Loriano Storchi
AU - Giovanni Bistoni
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/14
PB - ChemRxiv
DO - 10.26434/chemrxiv.15008797/v1
UR - https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15008797/v1
AB - Machine-learned formation enthalpies for inorganic materials approach density functional theory (DFT) accuracy, yet thermodynamic stability predictions derived from them can remain unreliable, a gap commonly associated with error cancellation in DFT that independent per-compound training does not reproduce. We introduce the interference index ξ, a dimensionless measure of how strongly errors reinforce or cancel in linearly derived quantities. Its root-mean-square average, ξrms, provides a reaction-size-independent null reference, with ξrms = 1 for the isotropic null model. Across seven published models benchmarked on Materials Project compounds, error-cancellation behaviour is distinct from per-compound accuracy and becomes progressively less favourable with increasing formation-enthalpy accuracy among the compositional models. We then introduce iiLoss, a reaction-aware objective that favours cancellation of formation-enthalpy errors rather than directly minimising decomposition-enthalpy error. On Materials Project data, iiLoss reduces decomposition-enthalpy error by 21% and improves thermodynamic stability classification by 6.8% in F1 score, outperforming direct supervision on decomposition enthalpies. These results show that error cancellation can be quantified and directly optimised to improve derived thermodynamic predictions.
ER -