Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,549 studies31 sourcesUpdated 58 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

The Geometric Function Atlas: Using What We Know About Radius Problems to Solve New Ones

Abstract

Usually, radius problems between Ma--Minda classes are solved one pair at a time, by fitting a disk inside the target region, providing a sufficient but not always the sharp radius. The same class appearing under different names makes comparison of results harder, with mistakes and duplication eluding detection. The Geometric Function Atlas catalogs radius problems using exact generators and a direction (source → target), ensuring unique identification. For each problem, we then compute the radius numerically, together with the point where the image first meets the target boundary. This helps us identify the sharp estimate which guides the proof we write. With this system, we were able to refine two earlier stated estimates, the disk radius for the sine → modified sigmoid and sine → rational cases from arsinh c to arcsin c, and correct earlier stated values for the crescent and exponential classes: the sharp radius is sin 1 from crescent to exponential, and log(1+√2) from exponential to crescent. All four proofs follow a common strategy: an estimate that is exact at the contact point, followed by the standard extremal function. Applying the method, we derive fifteen further sharp radii, four of them known.

Related

  1. The answer about Itzkowitz's Problems on FSIN groups
    Dekui Peng, Li-Hong Xie, Jiang Yang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeometry & topologyarXiv
  2. Two problems about bases and independent sets in free groups
    Lucy Koch-Hyde, Éamonn Olive
    arXivPreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  3. On the Orlicz function estimations of the a-Davis--Wielandt radius in C*-algebra
    Debarati Bhattacharya, Fuad Kittaneh, Arnab Patra
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  4. Four problems about the irreducible determined T0-topologies
    Chongyun Zhao, Xiaoquan Xu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeometry & topologyarXiv
  5. A priori bounds for geodesic diameter. Part III. A Sobolev–Poincaré inequality and applications to a variety of geometric variational problems
    Ulrich Menne, Christian Scharrer
    Duke Mathematical JournalPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text8 citedGeneral mathematicsOpenAlex
BibTeX
@misc{devadiga2026geometric,
  title = {{The Geometric Function Atlas: Using What We Know About Radius Problems to Solve New Ones}},
  author = {Prasanna Devadiga and Kishan Gurumurthy and Arya Suneesh and Pushparaj Devadiga and Asha Sebastian},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.15697},
  eprint = {2608.15697},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15697},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - The Geometric Function Atlas: Using What We Know About Radius Problems to Solve New Ones
AU  - Prasanna Devadiga
AU  - Kishan Gurumurthy
AU  - Arya Suneesh
AU  - Pushparaj Devadiga
AU  - Asha Sebastian
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/19
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.15697
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15697
AB  - Usually, radius problems between Ma--Minda classes are solved one pair at a time, by fitting a disk inside the target region, providing a sufficient but not always the sharp radius. The same class appearing under different names makes comparison of results harder, with mistakes and duplication eluding detection. The Geometric Function Atlas catalogs radius problems using exact generators and a direction (source → target), ensuring unique identification. For each problem, we then compute the radius numerically, together with the point where the image first meets the target boundary. This helps us identify the sharp estimate which guides the proof we write. With this system, we were able to refine two earlier stated estimates, the disk radius for the sine → modified sigmoid and sine → rational cases from arsinh c to arcsin c, and correct earlier stated values for the crescent and exponential classes: the sharp radius is sin 1 from crescent to exponential, and log(1+√2) from exponential to crescent. All four proofs follow a common strategy: an estimate that is exact at the contact point, followed by the standard extremal function. Applying the method, we derive fifteen further sharp radii, four of them known.
ER  -