Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,123 studies31 sourcesUpdated 31 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

The Gannon Storm: Citizen science observations during the geomagnetic superstorm of 10 May 2024

3 more authors

Abstract

The 10 May 2024 geomagnetic storm, referred to as the Gannon Storm in this paper, was one of the most extreme to have occurred in over 20 years. In the era of smartphones and social media, millions of people from all around the world were alerted to the possibility of exceptional auroral displays. Hence, many people not only witnessed but also photographed the aurora during this event. These citizen science observations, although not from scientific instruments operated by observatories or research groups, can prove invaluable in obtaining data to characterise this extraordinary event. In particular, many observers saw and photographed the aurora at mid-latitudes, where ground-based instruments targeting auroral studies are sparse or absent. We created an online survey and circulated it within networks of aurora photographers to collect observations of the aurora and disruptions in technological systems that were experienced during this superstorm. We obtained 696 citizen science reports from over 30 countries, containing information such as the time and location of aurora sightings, observed colours and auroral forms during the geomagnetic storm. We supplemented the obtained dataset with 186 auroral observations logged in the Skywarden catalogue by citizen scientists. The main findings enabled by the data collected through these reports are that the aurora was widely seen from locations at geomagnetic latitudes ranging between 30° and 60°, with a few reports from even lower latitudes. This was significantly further equatorward than predicted by auroral oval models. The reported auroral emission colours, predominantly red and pink and intense enough to reach naked-eye visibility, suggest that the auroral electron precipitation contained large fluxes of low-energy (< 1 keV) particles. (...)

Versions

Related

  1. Shock Detectives: classifying MMS observations of Earth’s magnetosheath via citizen science
    Vicki Toy-Edens, Wenli Mo, Savvas Raptis +9
    Frontiers in Astronomy and Space SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral astronomyGeophysics & seismologyDOAJ
  2. The JWST Early Release Science Program for Direct Observations of Exoplanetary Systems VIII: patchy forsterite and enstatite clouds in the atmosphere of VHS 1256 b, retrieval lessons learned and outlook to the future
    Niall Whiteford, Jacqueline Faherty, Ben Burningham +123
    ArxivPreprintLicence not statedFull textSolar & stellar physicsHAL
  3. Impact of geomagnetic storm intensity on thermospheric density and orbital decay of LEO satellites: a G1–G5 per-event analysis
    Jeong-Heon Kim, Giwoong Eom, Young-Sil Kwak +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral astronomyCrossref
  4. Interhemispheric differences in field-aligned currents, ground magnetic perturbations, and TEC during the geomagnetic storms of May and October 2024
    Sumanjit Chakraborty, Gopi K. Seemala
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPlanetary science & exoplanetsSolar & stellar physicsarXiv
  5. Understanding the Complex Morphology of a Coronal Mass Ejection. III: How to Create a Severe Geomagnetic Storm
    Cecilia Mac Cormack, Abril Sahade, Erika Palmerio +4
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textSolar & stellar physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{grandin2026gannon,
  title = {{The Gannon Storm: Citizen science observations during the geomagnetic superstorm of 10 May 2024}},
  author = {Maxime Grandin and Emma Bruus and Vincent E. Ledvina and Noora Partamies and Mathieu Barthelemy and Carlos Martinis and Rowan Dayton-Oxland and Bea Gallardo-Lacourt and Yukitoshi Nishimura and Katie Herlingshaw and Neethal Thomas and Eero Karvinen and Donna Lach and Marjan Spijkers and Calle Bergstrand},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.19929},
  eprint = {2610.19929},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19929},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - The Gannon Storm: Citizen science observations during the geomagnetic superstorm of 10 May 2024
AU  - Maxime Grandin
AU  - Emma Bruus
AU  - Vincent E. Ledvina
AU  - Noora Partamies
AU  - Mathieu Barthelemy
AU  - Carlos Martinis
AU  - Rowan Dayton-Oxland
AU  - Bea Gallardo-Lacourt
AU  - Yukitoshi Nishimura
AU  - Katie Herlingshaw
AU  - Neethal Thomas
AU  - Eero Karvinen
AU  - Donna Lach
AU  - Marjan Spijkers
AU  - Calle Bergstrand
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/14
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.19929
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19929
AB  - The 10 May 2024 geomagnetic storm, referred to as the Gannon Storm in this paper, was one of the most extreme to have occurred in over 20 years. In the era of smartphones and social media, millions of people from all around the world were alerted to the possibility of exceptional auroral displays. Hence, many people not only witnessed but also photographed the aurora during this event. These citizen science observations, although not from scientific instruments operated by observatories or research groups, can prove invaluable in obtaining data to characterise this extraordinary event. In particular, many observers saw and photographed the aurora at mid-latitudes, where ground-based instruments targeting auroral studies are sparse or absent. We created an online survey and circulated it within networks of aurora photographers to collect observations of the aurora and disruptions in technological systems that were experienced during this superstorm. We obtained 696 citizen science reports from over 30 countries, containing information such as the time and location of aurora sightings, observed colours and auroral forms during the geomagnetic storm. We supplemented the obtained dataset with 186 auroral observations logged in the Skywarden catalogue by citizen scientists. The main findings enabled by the data collected through these reports are that the aurora was widely seen from locations at geomagnetic latitudes ranging between 30° and 60°, with a few reports from even lower latitudes. This was significantly further equatorward than predicted by auroral oval models. The reported auroral emission colours, predominantly red and pink and intense enough to reach naked-eye visibility, suggest that the auroral electron precipitation contained large fluxes of low-energy (< 1 keV) particles. (...)
ER  -