Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 7 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Zoological Research

Creative problem solving in a jumping spider

6 affiliations
  1. 1State Key Laboratory of Biocatalysis and Enzyme Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Hubei University, Wuhan, Hubei 430062, China
  2. 2Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan 666303, China
  3. 3University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  4. 4Department of Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620, USA
  5. 5Center for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan 666303, China
  6. 6Southeast Asia Biodiversity Research Institute, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan 666303, China

Abstract

Behavioural innovation, a key indicator of advanced cognition, has been well documented across animal taxa and manifests as creative problem-solving. Typical innovators such as apes and corvids can spontaneously solve complex, multi-step tasks individually without prior training. Innovative behaviours in arthropods—honeybees, bumblebees, and ants—are probably underestimated because their innovative behaviours are often considered products of associative learning, group-level processes, or one-step problem-solving. Here, we challenge this view by demonstrating spontaneous, individual-level innovation in nest construction by the social-living jumping spider Toxeus maxillosus, without prior training or external demonstration. Under four challenging laboratory conditions, T. maxillosus females exhibited the core components of typical innovative behaviours: environmental exploration, behavioural flexibility, insight, and action planning. Furthermore, in a vertical string-pulling task (a benchmark test of animal innovation), half of the spiders pulled an out-of-reach sponge upward and incorporated it into the inner wall of the device, thereby creating a suitable microstructure for nest construction. These behaviours demonstrate multi-step, goal-directed object manipulation. Our findings suggest that arthropods are capable of individual-level, spontaneous innovation involving planning and multi-step sequences, akin to those observed in typical innovators. We propose that a social lifestyle centred on prolonged maternal care—a trait shared by T. maxillosus and many vertebrate innovators—rather than large brain size or long lifespan, may be a critical evolutionary driver of such cognitive complexity. This study challenges the vertebrate-centric view of typical innovation and provides a new framework for understanding the evolution of cognition across phylogenetic scales.

Related

  1. Can a Tiny Brain Plan? Reconstructing a Predatory Detour inthe Jumping Spider Portia labiata
    F. J. Petrie, M. Tan, C. Li +3
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textZoology & animal behaviourbioRxiv
  2. Solving Paleobotany's 200-year problem with fluorescence and artificial intelligence
    S. A. Maccracken, R. S. Barclay, T. G. Kaye +9
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textEvolutionary biologybioRxiv
  3. BioMINTREL expands biological problem solving through cross-disciplinary representations
    J. Dong, Y. Zhang, E. Gao +7
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  4. A puzzling situation: How cooperation and social observation influence visuospatial problem-solving
    Federico Cassioli, Nellia Bellaert, Mandy Rossignol +2
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceOSF
  5. On the asymbiotic germination of some New Zealand spider orchids (Corybas).
    J. Alderton-Moss, K. van der Walt, C. A. Lehnebach
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textPlant biologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@article{wang2026creative,
  title = {{Creative problem solving in a jumping spider}},
  author = {Yi-Rong Wang and Chu Jiang and Yu Zeng and Ahimsa Campos-Arceiz and Jing-Xin Liu and Xiaoguo Jiao and Zhanqi Chen},
  journal = {Zoological Research},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2025.527},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2025.527},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Creative problem solving in a jumping spider
AU  - Yi-Rong Wang
AU  - Chu Jiang
AU  - Yu Zeng
AU  - Ahimsa Campos-Arceiz
AU  - Jing-Xin Liu
AU  - Xiaoguo Jiao
AU  - Zhanqi Chen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/18
JO  - Zoological Research
DO  - 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2025.527
UR  - https://doi.org/10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2025.527
AB  - Behavioural innovation, a key indicator of advanced cognition, has been well documented across animal taxa and manifests as creative problem-solving. Typical innovators such as apes and corvids can spontaneously solve complex, multi-step tasks individually without prior training. Innovative behaviours in arthropods—honeybees, bumblebees, and ants—are probably underestimated because their innovative behaviours are often considered products of associative learning, group-level processes, or one-step problem-solving. Here, we challenge this view by demonstrating spontaneous, individual-level innovation in nest construction by the social-living jumping spider Toxeus maxillosus, without prior training or external demonstration. Under four challenging laboratory conditions, T. maxillosus females exhibited the core components of typical innovative behaviours: environmental exploration, behavioural flexibility, insight, and action planning. Furthermore, in a vertical string-pulling task (a benchmark test of animal innovation), half of the spiders pulled an out-of-reach sponge upward and incorporated it into the inner wall of the device, thereby creating a suitable microstructure for nest construction. These behaviours demonstrate multi-step, goal-directed object manipulation. Our findings suggest that arthropods are capable of individual-level, spontaneous innovation involving planning and multi-step sequences, akin to those observed in typical innovators. We propose that a social lifestyle centred on prolonged maternal care—a trait shared by T. maxillosus and many vertebrate innovators—rather than large brain size or long lifespan, may be a critical evolutionary driver of such cognitive complexity. This study challenges the vertebrate-centric view of typical innovation and provides a new framework for understanding the evolution of cognition across phylogenetic scales.
SN  - 2095-8137
ER  -