Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 11 min ago
PreprintCC BYZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

A cutoff-independent enstrophy bound for the sigma = 3 dispersive dyadic shell model: kernel-checked conservation of the second invariant along solutions, CVODE controls, and an illustration on The Well data

  1. 1SocrateAI Lab

Abstract

We study the truncated, complexified dyadic shell model of the QuantumFluids project: shells n = 0..N+1, kn = 2n, and a linear dispersive term −iωnvn. Its second invariant H = Σ 2−nωn|vn|2 + Σ 2−nkn Im(conj(vn)2vn+1) is conserved for every real dispersion law. For ωn = Dkn3 (σ = 3), its quadratic part equals 2DΩ. Every claim is filed in an Elenchus claim ledger with tiers A (kernel-checked Lean), L (cited literature), C (human argument, not machine-checked) and X (floating-point exploration, which never supports a claim). Tier A (Lean v4.34.0-rc2 with the QuantumFluids Mathlib build; axioms within propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound; planted sorry and planted-axiom controls caught by the axiom audit). We prove: the rate identity of H along the full vector field, including the dispersion/cubic cross terms; the chain rule; constancy of H and of the energy on [0,T] along any solution; hence 2DΩ(t) ≤ H3(0) + (2E(0))3/2 for every t in [0,T] and every cutoff N. These results are conditional: existence of solutions is a hypothesis, not a theorem; N is fixed; the model definitions are the QuantumFluids owner's design; the Lean files were checked by the producing agent and recompiled by a second agent instance; a separate AI-agent instance then ran an independent audit (AUDIT.md: recompile, its own planted sorry and axiom caught, numerics and tests rerun, hand proof re-derived); no human has audited statement adequacy. No openai/math result is used. Tier C: a step-by-step human demonstration written for undergraduates; the corollary Ω(t) ≤ Ω(0) + S(0)3/2/D, which is cutoff-uniform only for data with N-uniform Ω(0) and S(0); the reduction to Waleffe's dyadic Burgers chain on real data with D = 0 (Tier L). Tier X: a new rusty-SUNDIALS module integrates the model with CVODE (BDF). Conservation converges with tolerance, while a perturbed coupling breaks it. Every σ = 3 run (nmax ≤ 7) stays within the bound, with ratio at most 1. The maximum ratio is 0.360 on decaying data, 0.631 on data-initialised runs, and 0.995 on near-extremal top-shell data, where the supremum equals the t = 0 value to within 3.2e-7. A σ = 2 control grows like 2n. Shell spectra from the HuggingFace dataset polymathic-ai/turbulent_radiative_layer_2D (The Well, CC-BY-4.0, revision 2ee77565) initialise 24 runs, all within the bound. This is an illustration only. No breakthrough is claimed: the inequality is a short corollary of the owner's dispersive_norm_le. The new part is the Lean proof of the cross-term cancellation and of the chain rule along solutions. The ledger gate reports 0 blocking findings and 7 flags (exit 1), one for each Tier A row whose statement adequacy no human has audited. The work was produced by AI agents (Claude) under the author's direction; the author is responsible for the content.

Related

  1. Symplectic-inspired neural operators for discretization-invariant light propagation with exact power conservation
    Rui Yu, Jining Li, Qingmingyang Zhou +5
    Optics ExpressPeer-reviewedPublisher termsNumerical analysis & scientific computingCrossref
  2. An invariant variational proof for canonical processes with independent symmetric log-concave tails
    Witold Bednorz, Rafal Martynek, Rafal Meller
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textProbabilityarXiv
  3. Generalized symmetries, invariant solutions and conservation laws in the Jaynes-Cummings model
    Luis M. Piñuelas, Pablo C. López Vázquez, Alexander Yakhno
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textMathematical physicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Strongly enstrophy-stable integrators for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations
    Boris D. Andrews, Matin Shams, Patrick E. Farrell
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  5. Near-cancellation of enstrophy and strain requires shear or a balanced vortex
    Jonathan Massey
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsFluid dynamicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{callens2026cutoffindependent,
  title = {{A cutoff-independent enstrophy bound for the sigma = 3 dispersive dyadic shell model: kernel-checked conservation of the second invariant along solutions, CVODE controls, and an illustration on The Well data}},
  author = {Xavier Callens},
  howpublished = {Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23646110},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23646110},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A cutoff-independent enstrophy bound for the sigma = 3 dispersive dyadic shell model: kernel-checked conservation of the second invariant along solutions, CVODE controls, and an illustration on The Well data
AU  - Xavier Callens
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/25
PB  - Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.23646110
UR  - https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23646110
AB  - We study the truncated, complexified dyadic shell model of the QuantumFluids project: shells n = 0..N+1, kn = 2n, and a linear dispersive term −iωnvn. Its second invariant H = Σ 2−nωn|vn|2 + Σ 2−nkn Im(conj(vn)2vn+1) is conserved for every real dispersion law. For ωn = Dkn3 (σ = 3), its quadratic part equals 2DΩ. Every claim is filed in an Elenchus claim ledger with tiers A (kernel-checked Lean), L (cited literature), C (human argument, not machine-checked) and X (floating-point exploration, which never supports a claim). Tier A (Lean v4.34.0-rc2 with the QuantumFluids Mathlib build; axioms within propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound; planted sorry and planted-axiom controls caught by the axiom audit). We prove: the rate identity of H along the full vector field, including the dispersion/cubic cross terms; the chain rule; constancy of H and of the energy on [0,T] along any solution; hence 2DΩ(t) ≤ H3(0) + (2E(0))3/2 for every t in [0,T] and every cutoff N. These results are conditional: existence of solutions is a hypothesis, not a theorem; N is fixed; the model definitions are the QuantumFluids owner's design; the Lean files were checked by the producing agent and recompiled by a second agent instance; a separate AI-agent instance then ran an independent audit (AUDIT.md: recompile, its own planted sorry and axiom caught, numerics and tests rerun, hand proof re-derived); no human has audited statement adequacy. No openai/math result is used. Tier C: a step-by-step human demonstration written for undergraduates; the corollary Ω(t) ≤ Ω(0) + S(0)3/2/D, which is cutoff-uniform only for data with N-uniform Ω(0) and S(0); the reduction to Waleffe's dyadic Burgers chain on real data with D = 0 (Tier L). Tier X: a new rusty-SUNDIALS module integrates the model with CVODE (BDF). Conservation converges with tolerance, while a perturbed coupling breaks it. Every σ = 3 run (nmax ≤ 7) stays within the bound, with ratio at most 1. The maximum ratio is 0.360 on decaying data, 0.631 on data-initialised runs, and 0.995 on near-extremal top-shell data, where the supremum equals the t = 0 value to within 3.2e-7. A σ = 2 control grows like 2n. Shell spectra from the HuggingFace dataset polymathic-ai/turbulent_radiative_layer_2D (The Well, CC-BY-4.0, revision 2ee77565) initialise 24 runs, all within the bound. This is an illustration only. No breakthrough is claimed: the inequality is a short corollary of the owner's dispersive_norm_le. The new part is the Lean proof of the cross-term cancellation and of the chain rule along solutions. The ledger gate reports 0 blocking findings and 7 flags (exit 1), one for each Tier A row whose statement adequacy no human has audited. The work was produced by AI agents (Claude) under the author's direction; the author is responsible for the content.
ER  -