Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,686 studies31 sourcesUpdated 4 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Comparing Symmetry-Adapted Perturbation Theory to Intermolecular Energy Decomposition Analysis Based on Absolutely Localized Molecular Orbitals

  1. 1Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
  2. 2Biophysics Graduate Program, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States

Abstract

Energy decomposition analysis (EDA) can provide insight into noncovalent interactions, even though the individual energy components (electrostatics, Pauli repulsion, polarization, dispersion, etc.) are not uniquely defined within quantum mechanics. The present work examines the two titular EDA schemes and elucidates the degree of transferability between their components. We first demonstrate that a many-body dispersion (MBD) model can replace the conventional definition of dispersion in symmetry-adapted perturbation theory (SAPT), preserving reasonable accuracy as compared to third-order SAPT but reducing the computational cost to be comparable to density functional theory (DFT). Individual SAPT + MBD energy components exhibit good correlation with those computed using the absolutely localized molecular orbital (ALMO) EDA scheme, which is built around DFT, such that qualitative explanations and chemical trends are likely to be similar in either approach. SAPT + MBD and ALMO-EDA electrostatic energies are nearly identical, provided that a SAPT-style direct-product reference state is used for ALMO-EDA, but other energy components exhibit substantial quantitative differences. These conclusions hold across a range of density functionals used in the ALMO-EDA calculations, and for different choices of the “dispersion-free” functional that is used to isolate the dispersion energy from the target functional’s interaction energy. The present work provides calibration plots to translate between SAPT + MBD and ALMO-EDA energy components. For a large data set of dimers representing ligand–protein interactions, SAPT + MBD calculations afford superior agreement with the best ab initio benchmarks, as compared to calculations using the state-of-the-art ωB97M-V functional, especially when triple-ζ basis sets are used for SAPT. This conclusion holds even when three-body (Axilrod–Teller–Muto) dispersion corrections are added to the ωB97M-V results.

Versions

Related

  1. Symmetry-adapted perturbation theory for cavity-modified intermolecular interactions: QED-SAPT0 theory and implementation
    Kenny Ampoh, Ian Chaput, Ashlyn Shehan +3
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BYFull textAtomic, molecular & optical physicsChemRxiv
  2. Influence of Small Changes in Intermolecular Distances on Results of Interaction Energy Decomposition for Stacking Interactions, Hydrogen Bonds, and Antiparallel Interactions
    Jelena P. Blagojević Filipović, Snežana D. Zarić
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Atomic, molecular & optical physicsCrossref
  3. Maximum purity of absolutely separable and absolutely PPT states in qutrit--qudit systems
    Anh T. Tran
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textMathematical physicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Disorder on the hyperbolic square lattice I: Anderson delocalization and absolutely continuous spectrum
    Simon Becker, Izak Oltman
    arXivPreprintCC0Full textAnalysis & PDEsMathematical physicsarXiv
  5. Don't mind the gap: Absolutely Continuous Edge Spectrum in a Mobility Gap
    Simon Becker, Mengxuan Yang
    arXivPreprintCC0Full textAnalysis & PDEsMathematical physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@article{puthillathu2026comparing,
  title = {{Comparing Symmetry-Adapted Perturbation Theory to Intermolecular Energy Decomposition Analysis Based on Absolutely Localized Molecular Orbitals}},
  author = {Narayanan Puthillathu and Montgomery Gray and John M. Herbert},
  journal = {Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1021/acs.jctc.6c01446},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.6c01446},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparing Symmetry-Adapted Perturbation Theory to Intermolecular Energy Decomposition Analysis Based on Absolutely Localized Molecular Orbitals
AU  - Narayanan Puthillathu
AU  - Montgomery Gray
AU  - John M. Herbert
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/10
JO  - Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
DO  - 10.1021/acs.jctc.6c01446
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.6c01446
AB  - Energy decomposition analysis (EDA) can provide insight into noncovalent interactions, even though the individual energy components (electrostatics, Pauli repulsion, polarization, dispersion, etc.) are not uniquely defined within quantum mechanics. The present work examines the two titular EDA schemes and elucidates the degree of transferability between their components. We first demonstrate that a many-body dispersion (MBD) model can replace the conventional definition of dispersion in symmetry-adapted perturbation theory (SAPT), preserving reasonable accuracy as compared to third-order SAPT but reducing the computational cost to be comparable to density functional theory (DFT). Individual SAPT + MBD energy components exhibit good correlation with those computed using the absolutely localized molecular orbital (ALMO) EDA scheme, which is built around DFT, such that qualitative explanations and chemical trends are likely to be similar in either approach. SAPT + MBD and ALMO-EDA electrostatic energies are nearly identical, provided that a SAPT-style direct-product reference state is used for ALMO-EDA, but other energy components exhibit substantial quantitative differences. These conclusions hold across a range of density functionals used in the ALMO-EDA calculations, and for different choices of the “dispersion-free” functional that is used to isolate the dispersion energy from the target functional’s interaction energy. The present work provides calibration plots to translate between SAPT + MBD and ALMO-EDA energy components. For a large data set of dimers representing ligand–protein interactions, SAPT + MBD calculations afford superior agreement with the best ab initio benchmarks, as compared to calculations using the state-of-the-art ωB97M-V functional, especially when triple-ζ basis sets are used for SAPT. This conclusion holds even when three-body (Axilrod–Teller–Muto) dispersion corrections are added to the ωB97M-V results.
SN  - 1549-9618
SN  - 1549-9626
ER  -