Image size effect on memory generalizes to deeper encoding and cannot be explained by perceptual measures
Abstract
We have recently found that during shallow (“naturalistic”/incidental) encoding larger images are better remembered. However, it is unclear whether this reflects a genuine influence of image size on mnemonic processes or an epiphenomenal consequence of its influence on perception, and whether this effect robustly generalizes to deeper encoding. Here, we tested these in three experiments (n = 189) differing in encoding depth: naturalistic (freely viewing the images without being informed a memory test will follow), intentional memorization (freely viewing while memorizing the images since a memory test was to follow), or perceptual encoding (reporting for each image whether there was a person in it and whether it was taken indoors or outdoors, without being informed a memory test will follow). During encoding in the perceptual experiment, participants viewed 160 images of different sizes (3°-15.5°) followed by an old-new recognition memory test of 320 images (half “old”). While perceptual measures were at ceiling, memory improved with image size, presenting a dissociation between perception and memory and indicating that the effect of image size on memory is not a mere reflection of limited perception for smaller images. Additionally, the effect of image size on memory generalized to all encoding tasks such that memory improved for larger images (as evident by accuracy and d’), regardless of average memory performance increasing with encoding depth. These findings suggest that image size operates as a genuine sensory-based modulator of memory encoding, beyond perceptual sensitivity, pointing to a broader role of low-level visual properties in shaping memory representations.
Related
- Perceptual sensitivity is explained by optimization for ecological tasks
- Alignment of visual brain encoding models with individual perceptual similarity judgments
- Perceptual sensitivity supports online control, while perceptual errors drive motor memory formation during locomotor adaptation
- Memory retrieval explains dynamic effects of expectations on perceptual decisions
- Eye movement markers of relational encoding predict scene memory precision
BibTeX
@misc{masarwa2026image,
title = {{Image size effect on memory generalizes to deeper encoding and cannot be explained by perceptual measures}},
author = {Shaimaa Masarwa and Olga Kreichman and Sharon Gilaie-Dotan},
howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.31234/osf.io/235zn_v1},
url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/235zn_v1/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Image size effect on memory generalizes to deeper encoding and cannot be explained by perceptual measures
AU - Shaimaa Masarwa
AU - Olga Kreichman
AU - Sharon Gilaie-Dotan
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/28
PB - PsyArXiv
DO - 10.31234/osf.io/235zn_v1
UR - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/235zn_v1/
AB - We have recently found that during shallow (“naturalistic”/incidental) encoding larger images are better remembered. However, it is unclear whether this reflects a genuine influence of image size on mnemonic processes or an epiphenomenal consequence of its influence on perception, and whether this effect robustly generalizes to deeper encoding. Here, we tested these in three experiments (n = 189) differing in encoding depth: naturalistic (freely viewing the images without being informed a memory test will follow), intentional memorization (freely viewing while memorizing the images since a memory test was to follow), or perceptual encoding (reporting for each image whether there was a person in it and whether it was taken indoors or outdoors, without being informed a memory test will follow). During encoding in the perceptual experiment, participants viewed 160 images of different sizes (3°-15.5°) followed by an old-new recognition memory test of 320 images (half “old”). While perceptual measures were at ceiling, memory improved with image size, presenting a dissociation between perception and memory and indicating that the effect of image size on memory is not a mere reflection of limited perception for smaller images. Additionally, the effect of image size on memory generalized to all encoding tasks such that memory improved for larger images (as evident by accuracy and d’), regardless of average memory performance increasing with encoding depth. These findings suggest that image size operates as a genuine sensory-based modulator of memory encoding, beyond perceptual sensitivity, pointing to a broader role of low-level visual properties in shaping memory representations.
ER -