Different synthetic chemical dispersants elicit distinct bacterial community responses to crude oil
5 affiliations
- 1Department of Engineering, Durham University
- 2Institute of Mechanical, Process and Energy Engineering, School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University
- 3Singapore Centre for Environmental Life Sciences Engineering, National University of Singapore
- 4School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University
- 5James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow
Abstract
Background Dispersants are commonly used worldwide as a primary response tool to treat oil spills at sea, yet their use is debated due to their toxicological effects and potential to affect oil biodegradation rates. We examined the effect of three globally stockpiled synthetic chemical dispersants (Superdispersant 25, Slickgone EW, Slickgone NS) on the microbial response to crude oil and its biodegradation in a subarctic marine environment in two experiments using seawater sampled from the subarctic Faroe-Shetland Channel (FSC) in 2015 and 2017 and analysed by 16 S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Results Across both years, communities were dominated by known hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria, including Alcanivorax, Alteromonas, and Pseudoalteromonas. In the 2015 experiment, Superdispersant 25 enriched for Dokdonia, Thalassospira, and Roseobacter, genera with demonstrated alkane and PAH degradation pathways. In the 2017 experiment, Slickgone EW and NS selected Marinomonas, Colwellia, Psychromonas, and Alcanivorax. Samples without dispersant also contained hydrocarbon degraders, however, the community composition was altered. In 2017, we quantified hydrocarbon degradation using GC-FID/MS for aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons respectively. Hydrocarbon biomarker ratios showed n-alkane depletion (Pr/C17 and Ph/C18 ratios increased 3–12 fold) in dispersant treatments. Selective weathering was evident in all treatments. 9MP/1MP ratios indicated limited or variable effects on aromatic hydrocarbon biodegradation, particularly in the presence of dispersant. We integrated aromatic hydrocarbon concentrations with microbial community data using DIABLO (Data Integration Analysis for Biomarker discovery using Latent variable approaches for Omics studies). Several taxa were negatively correlated to specific aromatic hydrocarbons – i.e. they increased when the hydrocarbon was reduced suggesting the hydrocarbons may have served as a carbon source or the taxa were responding to hydrocarbon depletion. Taxa included Aquibacter, Hyphomonas, Thalassospira, Alteromonas, Sphingorhabdus, and Paraperlucidibaca. Marine oil snow (MOS) formed in all oil-amended treatments and showed high microbial colonisation, whereas marine dispersant snow showed little colonisation. Conclusion This study provides evidence that different dispersants affect different microbial responses to crude oil contamination, including the enrichment of key oil-degrading bacterial taxa. However, this did not correlate with enhanced aromatic hydrocarbon degradation. MOS formation with high microbial colonisation suggests natural aggregation processes may provide an effective biodegradation pathway. These findings raise questions about the functional benefit of synthetic chemical dispersants and highlight that the marine environment naturally harbours hydrocarbon-degrading microbial communities with the potential to respond to oil spills.
Related
- Responses of soil characteristics and bacterial communities to agricultural irrigation with different treatment levels of wastewater
- Host‐Associated Bacterial Community Changes After Laboratory Introduction Vary With Wolbachia Presence
- Effects of sulfate amendment and different temperatures on microbial community structure and hydrocarbon degradation in petroleum-contaminated soils
- Meropenem degradation does not necessarily eliminate antibacterial activity: responses of model and environmental bacterial isolates
- Compound microbial intelligent membrane fermentation reshapes the bacterial community and reduces antibiotic, metal, and biocide resistance genes and virulence factors in duck litter
BibTeX
@article{keating2026different,
title = {{Different synthetic chemical dispersants elicit distinct bacterial community responses to crude oil}},
author = {Ciara Keating and Laura Duran Suja and Stephen Summers and Ian M. Head and Umer Z. Ijaz and Tony Gutierrez},
journal = {Environmental Microbiome},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s40793-026-00932-5},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-026-00932-5},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Different synthetic chemical dispersants elicit distinct bacterial community responses to crude oil
AU - Ciara Keating
AU - Laura Duran Suja
AU - Stephen Summers
AU - Ian M. Head
AU - Umer Z. Ijaz
AU - Tony Gutierrez
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - Environmental Microbiome
DO - 10.1186/s40793-026-00932-5
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-026-00932-5
AB - Background Dispersants are commonly used worldwide as a primary response tool to treat oil spills at sea, yet their use is debated due to their toxicological effects and potential to affect oil biodegradation rates. We examined the effect of three globally stockpiled synthetic chemical dispersants (Superdispersant 25, Slickgone EW, Slickgone NS) on the microbial response to crude oil and its biodegradation in a subarctic marine environment in two experiments using seawater sampled from the subarctic Faroe-Shetland Channel (FSC) in 2015 and 2017 and analysed by 16 S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Results Across both years, communities were dominated by known hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria, including Alcanivorax, Alteromonas, and Pseudoalteromonas. In the 2015 experiment, Superdispersant 25 enriched for Dokdonia, Thalassospira, and Roseobacter, genera with demonstrated alkane and PAH degradation pathways. In the 2017 experiment, Slickgone EW and NS selected Marinomonas, Colwellia, Psychromonas, and Alcanivorax. Samples without dispersant also contained hydrocarbon degraders, however, the community composition was altered. In 2017, we quantified hydrocarbon degradation using GC-FID/MS for aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons respectively. Hydrocarbon biomarker ratios showed n-alkane depletion (Pr/C17 and Ph/C18 ratios increased 3–12 fold) in dispersant treatments. Selective weathering was evident in all treatments. 9MP/1MP ratios indicated limited or variable effects on aromatic hydrocarbon biodegradation, particularly in the presence of dispersant. We integrated aromatic hydrocarbon concentrations with microbial community data using DIABLO (Data Integration Analysis for Biomarker discovery using Latent variable approaches for Omics studies). Several taxa were negatively correlated to specific aromatic hydrocarbons – i.e. they increased when the hydrocarbon was reduced suggesting the hydrocarbons may have served as a carbon source or the taxa were responding to hydrocarbon depletion. Taxa included Aquibacter, Hyphomonas, Thalassospira, Alteromonas, Sphingorhabdus, and Paraperlucidibaca. Marine oil snow (MOS) formed in all oil-amended treatments and showed high microbial colonisation, whereas marine dispersant snow showed little colonisation. Conclusion This study provides evidence that different dispersants affect different microbial responses to crude oil contamination, including the enrichment of key oil-degrading bacterial taxa. However, this did not correlate with enhanced aromatic hydrocarbon degradation. MOS formation with high microbial colonisation suggests natural aggregation processes may provide an effective biodegradation pathway. These findings raise questions about the functional benefit of synthetic chemical dispersants and highlight that the marine environment naturally harbours hydrocarbon-degrading microbial communities with the potential to respond to oil spills.
SN - 2524-6372
ER -