Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 47 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Cancers

Pulmonary Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: Molecular Heterogeneity, Current Treatment and the Emerging Precision-Oncology Paradigm

5 affiliations
  1. 1Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
  2. 2Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Gangshan Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 820011, Taiwan
  3. 3Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Siaogang Hospital, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
  4. 4Cancer Center, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
  5. 5School of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan

Abstract

Pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare, aggressive malignancy with substantial biological heterogeneity. Genomic studies identify SCLC-like and NSCLC-like spectra, but genomic categories overlap incompletely with transcriptional states. Morphology remains essential: neither neuroendocrine marker positivity nor RB1 status alone distinguishes LCNEC from small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). This narrative review integrates diagnostic limitations, stage-based management, and the clinical implications of profiling. Surgery with systematic nodal assessment is central for resectable disease; postoperative platinum chemotherapy has greater support than perioperative immunotherapy. In advanced disease, platinum-etoposide is a commonly used reference regimen. Retrospective associations involving platinum-gemcitabine or platinum-taxanes in RB1-wild-type tumors remain hypothesis-generating and should not be extended to pemetrexed. LANCE, a durvalumab phase II trial, and preliminary NEJ044 findings provide prospective chemo-immunotherapy observations, although randomized LCNEC-specific evidence remains absent. No standard second-line regimen is established. Rare actionable drivers may support matched treatment, whereas DLL3-directed approaches and FGL1/SPINK1-associated strategies require clinical validation. We propose an evidence-qualified framework separating stage-based care, individualized molecular considerations, and clinical-trial strategies.

Related

  1. Molecular Subtypes of Pulmonary Large-cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Predict Chemotherapy Treatment Outcome.
    Jules L Derks, Noémie Leblay, Erik Thunnissen +12
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer ResearchPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text231 citedOncologyHAL
  2. Clinical and Demographic Characteristics of Patients with Pulmonary Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: A Single-Center Experience
    Yeşim Özufacık Bölükbaşı, Aydın Aytekin
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. First-Line Lorlatinib for ALK-Rearranged Pulmonary Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma with Brain Metastases and Suspected Leptomeningeal Involvement: A Case Report and Literature Review
    Yoshio Nakano, Kazuya Nishimura, Hiroka Serizawa +5
    Internal MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineJ-STAGE
  4. Molecular characterization of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung by multilayered omics analysis
    Megumi Tateishi, Yoshiki Otsuka, Ryota Matsuoka +17
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textOncologyCrossref
  5. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase immunohistochemical positivity in high-grade pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma: an actionable signal or merely a shadow?
    Ullas Batra, Sabeena Choudhary, Ritwika Choudhury +6
    Journal of Clinical PathologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
BibTeX
@article{lee2026pulmonary,
  title = {{Pulmonary Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: Molecular Heterogeneity, Current Treatment and the Emerging Precision-Oncology Paradigm}},
  author = {Tai-Huang Lee and Juei-Yang Ma and Huei-Yang Hung and Chia-Yu Kuo and Chin-Ling Chen and Pei-Chi Tsai and Cheng-Hao Chuang and Chih-Jen Yang},
  journal = {Cancers},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.3390/cancers18213585},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/21/3585},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Pulmonary Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: Molecular Heterogeneity, Current Treatment and the Emerging Precision-Oncology Paradigm
AU  - Tai-Huang Lee
AU  - Juei-Yang Ma
AU  - Huei-Yang Hung
AU  - Chia-Yu Kuo
AU  - Chin-Ling Chen
AU  - Pei-Chi Tsai
AU  - Cheng-Hao Chuang
AU  - Chih-Jen Yang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/07
JO  - Cancers
DO  - 10.3390/cancers18213585
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/21/3585
AB  - Pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare, aggressive malignancy with substantial biological heterogeneity. Genomic studies identify SCLC-like and NSCLC-like spectra, but genomic categories overlap incompletely with transcriptional states. Morphology remains essential: neither neuroendocrine marker positivity nor RB1 status alone distinguishes LCNEC from small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). This narrative review integrates diagnostic limitations, stage-based management, and the clinical implications of profiling. Surgery with systematic nodal assessment is central for resectable disease; postoperative platinum chemotherapy has greater support than perioperative immunotherapy. In advanced disease, platinum-etoposide is a commonly used reference regimen. Retrospective associations involving platinum-gemcitabine or platinum-taxanes in RB1-wild-type tumors remain hypothesis-generating and should not be extended to pemetrexed. LANCE, a durvalumab phase II trial, and preliminary NEJ044 findings provide prospective chemo-immunotherapy observations, although randomized LCNEC-specific evidence remains absent. No standard second-line regimen is established. Rare actionable drivers may support matched treatment, whereas DLL3-directed approaches and FGL1/SPINK1-associated strategies require clinical validation. We propose an evidence-qualified framework separating stage-based care, individualized molecular considerations, and clinical-trial strategies.
SN  - 2072-6694
ER  -