Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 54 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature

Mortality risk stratification in contemporary myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock: development of AMICS-ADMIT prediction model and benchmarking of established scores.

  1. 1Philipps-Universität Marburg, Department of Cardiology, Angiology, and Intensive Care Medicine, Baldingerstraße, Marburg, 35043, Germany.

Abstract

Background

Mortality risk stratification in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) remains challenging with heterogeneous temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) use. We developed and temporally validated the admission-based AMICS-ADMIT model and bedside score and benchmarked them against established scores.Methods

This retrospective single-centre study, reported according to TRIPOD+AI, included 479 consecutive patients with AMI-CS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between January 2017 and July 2025. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. AMICS-ADMIT was developed using multivariable logistic regression in the 2017-2022 cohort, internally evaluated by bootstrap resampling, and temporally validated in the 2023-2025 cohort. Missing data were multiply imputed. Performance was assessed using discrimination, calibration, and Brier scores. Benchmarking against CardShock, IABP-SHOCK II, and GRACE was restricted to temporal validation; tMCS-stratified performance was exploratory.Results

In-hospital mortality was 42.6% (204/479). The final model included age, left ventricular ejection fraction, prior cardiopulmonary resuscitation, estimated glomerular filtration rate, vasoactive-inotropic score, and ST-segment elevation status. The continuous model achieved AUCs of 0.809 (95% CI 0.764-0.855) in development and 0.834 (95% CI 0.769-0.899) in temporal validation, with Brier scores of 0.176 and 0.167 and favourable calibration. The bedside score achieved AUCs of 0.777 (95% CI 0.728-0.826) and 0.775 (95% CI 0.699-0.851), respectively, with stepwise mortality separation across predefined risk categories. Discrimination did not differ significantly from CardShock, IABP-SHOCK II, or GRACE.Conclusions

AMICS-ADMIT showed stable temporal performance and clinically interpretable early risk stratification in contemporary PCI-treated AMI-CS. External multicentre validation is required before clinical implementation.

Related

  1. Cytomegalovirus Retinitis Across the Immunosuppression Spectrum: A Contemporary Framework for Risk Stratification, Diagnosis, and Vision-Preserving Therapy
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Clinically Accessible Phenotypes Refine Cardiovascular Risk Stratification Beyond Contemporary Clinical Equations
    H. Yang, J. Guo, X. Shi +6
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  3. Enhanced Early Risk Stratification in Cardiogenic Shock Using Machine Learning: A Hierarchical Clustering Analysis.
    Shuojohn Li, Abduljabar Adi, Alejandro Quintero Villegas +6
    JACC. AdvancesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
  4. Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Acute Myocardial Infarction-Related Cardiogenic Shock: Lessons from Contemporary Randomized Trials
    Osama Odeh, Mariam Al-Bayati, Ali Abdulrazzaq +2
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCCrossref
  5. Norepinephrine Equivalent Dose for Mortality Risk Stratification in VA-ECMO Cardiogenic Shock
    Pierre-Gregoire Guinot, Maxime Nguyen, Osama Abou-Arab +3
    JACC. AdvancesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biologyCardiovascular medicineHAL
BibTeX
@article{mihali2026mortality,
  title = {{Mortality risk stratification in contemporary myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock: development of AMICS-ADMIT prediction model and benchmarking of established scores.}},
  author = {Klevis Mihali and Birgit Markus and Kornelia Neuner and Georgios Chatzis and Lukas Harbaum and Mykyta Fomin and Maryana Choukeir and Styliani Syntila and Bernhard Schieffer and Julian Kreutz},
  journal = {International journal of cardiology. Heart \& vasculature},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.ijcha.2026.102029},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42908764},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Mortality risk stratification in contemporary myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock: development of AMICS-ADMIT prediction model and benchmarking of established scores.
AU  - Klevis Mihali
AU  - Birgit Markus
AU  - Kornelia Neuner
AU  - Georgios Chatzis
AU  - Lukas Harbaum
AU  - Mykyta Fomin
AU  - Maryana Choukeir
AU  - Styliani Syntila
AU  - Bernhard Schieffer
AU  - Julian Kreutz
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/14
JO  - International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature
DO  - 10.1016/j.ijcha.2026.102029
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42908764
AB  - Background  Mortality risk stratification in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) remains challenging with heterogeneous temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) use. We developed and temporally validated the admission-based AMICS-ADMIT model and bedside score and benchmarked them against established scores.Methods  This retrospective single-centre study, reported according to TRIPOD+AI, included 479 consecutive patients with AMI-CS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between January 2017 and July 2025. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. AMICS-ADMIT was developed using multivariable logistic regression in the 2017-2022 cohort, internally evaluated by bootstrap resampling, and temporally validated in the 2023-2025 cohort. Missing data were multiply imputed. Performance was assessed using discrimination, calibration, and Brier scores. Benchmarking against CardShock, IABP-SHOCK II, and GRACE was restricted to temporal validation; tMCS-stratified performance was exploratory.Results  In-hospital mortality was 42.6% (204/479). The final model included age, left ventricular ejection fraction, prior cardiopulmonary resuscitation, estimated glomerular filtration rate, vasoactive-inotropic score, and ST-segment elevation status. The continuous model achieved AUCs of 0.809 (95% CI 0.764-0.855) in development and 0.834 (95% CI 0.769-0.899) in temporal validation, with Brier scores of 0.176 and 0.167 and favourable calibration. The bedside score achieved AUCs of 0.777 (95% CI 0.728-0.826) and 0.775 (95% CI 0.699-0.851), respectively, with stepwise mortality separation across predefined risk categories. Discrimination did not differ significantly from CardShock, IABP-SHOCK II, or GRACE.Conclusions  AMICS-ADMIT showed stable temporal performance and clinically interpretable early risk stratification in contemporary PCI-treated AMI-CS. External multicentre validation is required before clinical implementation.
SN  - 2352-9067
ER  -