Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Scientific Reports

Laboratory-based nutritional risk assessment including GDF15 in cirrhosis: a multicenter retrospective study

Abstract

Malnutrition is a common complication of cirrhosis and is associated with adverse outcomes. However, current nutritional risk assessment tools may not fully incorporate objective laboratory biomarkers. This study aimed to develop a biomarker-based prediction model for nutritional risk assessment in patients with cirrhosis. We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 551 patients with liver cirrhosis from two centers between April 2023 and April 2026. The Royal Free Hospital–Nutritional Prioritizing Tool (RFH-NPT) classification was used as the reference standard for nutritional risk categorization. Candidate predictors were selected using univariate logistic regression and feature selection methods. Model performance was evaluated by discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. Model interpretability was evaluated using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). The added predictive value of the predictors was assessed using the net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). Hepatic decompensation was assessed using survival analysis. The laboratory-based approach incorporating growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15), carbohydrate antigen 19 − 9 (CA19-9), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), Child–Turcotte–Pugh (CTP) score, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and triglyceride–glucose (TyG) index demonstrated satisfactory discrimination for nutritional risk stratification in cirrhosis (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] = 0.857). Calibration showed acceptable agreement, and decision curve analysis (DCA) suggested potential clinical utility. GDF15 demonstrated the strongest association with nutritional risk. Its addition improved discrimination (AUROC: 0.850 to 0.862; NRI = 0.2273, IDI = 0.0236; P < 0.05). Higher GDF15 levels were associated with increased risk of hepatic decompensation (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.4). We developed and externally validated a laboratory-based approach for nutritional risk assessment in patients with cirrhosis. This approach integrates routinely available laboratory indicators with clinical parameters and may serve as a complementary approach to support nutritional risk stratification in clinical settings.

Related

  1. WFUMB-Recommended Versus Manufacturer-Optimized Protocols for Ultrasound-Guided Attenuation Parameter in Hepatic Steatosis Assessment: A Retrospective Single-Vendor Multicenter Study
    Hidekatsu Kuroda, Takuma Oguri, Naohisa Kamiyama +16
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  2. Laboratory-based case finding using phosphate and alkaline phosphatase to identify genetic and nutritional rickets in children
    Beatriz Domínguez-Sevillano, Mary Alejandra Ferrín-Ferrín, David Cembrero-Fuciños +7
    Frontiers in endocrinologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMC
  3. Calculated Serum Antioxidant Capacity Masks Opposite Associations of Urate and Unconjugated Bilirubin with Leukocyte Count: A Ten-Year Cross-Sectional Hospital Laboratory Study Including 25-Hydroxyvitamin D
    Joško Osredkar, Uroš Godnov, Aleš Jerin +1
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General medicineCrossref
  4. Clinical Course and Discontinuation of Olanzapine Long-Acting Injectable: A Retrospective Case Series Including a Case of Post-Injection Delirium/Sedation Syndrome
    Luke Stout, Kyle Nguyen, Alonzo Arambulo +2
    Psychopharmacology BulletinPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
  5. Multicenter evaluation of Alinity m BKV assay in plasma and urine: Comparison with laboratory-developed tests across three centers
    Michelle Francis, Jee-Soo Lee, Megan Gooey +9
    Journal of Clinical Virology PlusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{cui2026laboratorybased,
  title = {{Laboratory-based nutritional risk assessment including GDF15 in cirrhosis: a multicenter retrospective study}},
  author = {Ranliang Cui and Yue Cao and Yueguo Li},
  journal = {Scientific Reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-73776-1},
  url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-73776-1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Laboratory-based nutritional risk assessment including GDF15 in cirrhosis: a multicenter retrospective study
AU  - Ranliang Cui
AU  - Yue Cao
AU  - Yueguo Li
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/08
JO  - Scientific Reports
DO  - 10.1038/s41598-026-73776-1
UR  - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-73776-1
AB  - Malnutrition is a common complication of cirrhosis and is associated with adverse outcomes. However, current nutritional risk assessment tools may not fully incorporate objective laboratory biomarkers. This study aimed to develop a biomarker-based prediction model for nutritional risk assessment in patients with cirrhosis. We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 551 patients with liver cirrhosis from two centers between April 2023 and April 2026. The Royal Free Hospital–Nutritional Prioritizing Tool (RFH-NPT) classification was used as the reference standard for nutritional risk categorization. Candidate predictors were selected using univariate logistic regression and feature selection methods. Model performance was evaluated by discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. Model interpretability was evaluated using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). The added predictive value of the predictors was assessed using the net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). Hepatic decompensation was assessed using survival analysis. The laboratory-based approach incorporating growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15), carbohydrate antigen 19 − 9 (CA19-9), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), Child–Turcotte–Pugh (CTP) score, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and triglyceride–glucose (TyG) index demonstrated satisfactory discrimination for nutritional risk stratification in cirrhosis (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] = 0.857). Calibration showed acceptable agreement, and decision curve analysis (DCA) suggested potential clinical utility. GDF15 demonstrated the strongest association with nutritional risk. Its addition improved discrimination (AUROC: 0.850 to 0.862; NRI = 0.2273, IDI = 0.0236; P < 0.05). Higher GDF15 levels were associated with increased risk of hepatic decompensation (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.4). We developed and externally validated a laboratory-based approach for nutritional risk assessment in patients with cirrhosis. This approach integrates routinely available laboratory indicators with clinical parameters and may serve as a complementary approach to support nutritional risk stratification in clinical settings.
SN  - 2045-2322
ER  -