Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,164 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)

CSFINet-Based Multimodal MRI Image Segmentation and Survival Prediction.

  1. 1Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 24205, Taiwan.

Abstract

Background: Brain tumors are highly lethal malignant neoplasms, for which accurate tumor segmentation and survival-day prediction are critical to treatment planning and prognostic assessment. This study establishes an exploratory two-stage analytical framework spanning multimodal MRI tumor segmentation and survival-day prediction. Methods: The study is based on the BraTS 2020 multimodal MRI dataset, employing four imaging modalities-T1, T1ce, T2, and FLAIR-with patient age and extent-of-resection status as candidate clinical features. The 235 cases with survival labels were split at the patient level (188 training, 47 test; single 80:20 split). In the first stage, CSFINet is used for brain tumor segmentation; in the second stage, the resulting binary whole-tumor mask, age, and resection status serve as inputs for survival-day prediction. The survival models are trained on the ground-truth whole-tumor masks but evaluated on the masks predicted by CSFINet, and the survival training runs were not seeded. Four models-image-only, image with age, image with resection status, and image with both-are constructed for ablation experiments, and Gradient SHAP is introduced for interpretability analysis. Results: CSFINet achieves a Mean Dice, Mean Precision, and Mean Recall of 0.7849±0.1937, 0.8739±0.1978, and 0.7480±0.1936, compared with 0.5084, 0.8676, and 0.3822 for a U-Net baseline trained in this study under an identical configuration. The gains are in Dice and recall; the precision difference (+0.0063, 95% CI -0.0601 to 0.1086) is not distinguishable from zero. This comparison is internal to the present study; published BraTS 2020 results were obtained under different evaluation protocols and are not directly comparable. The model combining imaging features with age yields the lowest error, achieving a mean absolute error of 251.69 days (95% CI [186.56, 336.79])-lower than the 279.41 days obtained by the image-only model-whereas incorporating resection status does not lead to further improvement. Conclusions: CSFINet improves whole-tumor segmentation relative to this identically configured U-Net baseline-not relative to the published state of the art-and the inclusion of age was associated with a lower survival-day prediction error in this study. The survival findings are exploratory and cohort-specific: an MAE of 252 days is roughly 57% of the reported median survival of glioblastoma and is not clinically actionable, and the web interface is a research prototype. This study establishes an integrated analytical pipeline spanning tumor segmentation, survival-day prediction, and result visualization, serving as a preliminary reference for brain tumor image analysis and prognostic assessment. These are exploratory, single-cohort associations obtained from BraTS 2020; they do not establish a causal relationship between the clinical variables and survival, and they have not been externally validated.

Related

  1. Interpretable multimodal deep learning for time-resolved survival prediction after hepatocellular carcinoma resection
    Fan Li, Huancheng Yang, Ruishan Liu +16
    NPJ Digital MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textMedical imaging & radiologyPMC
  2. Urinary stone segmentation: A computationally efficient yet consistently effective approach using image processing
    B. D. Le, S.-H. Yang, H. T. Nguyen +2
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textGeneral medicinemedRxiv
  3. Contrastive adversarial mix-up learning for unsupervised cross-modality image segmentation
    Yichao Shen, Pingjun Gu, Changhui Yu +4
    Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textMedical imaging & radiologyEurope PMC
  4. AMF-U-Net: an adaptive multimodal fusion residual attention 3D U-Net for boundary-aware brain tumour segmentation
    A. Anushya, Rasha Almarshdi, Bedour Alrashidi +3
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossref
  5. Spatially-adaptive dynamic dictionary learning for fine-grained remote sensing image segmentation
    Yan Zhang, Zifei Luo, Bo Yang +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text1 citedGeneral medicineDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{hsu2026csfinetbased,
  title = {{CSFINet-Based Multimodal MRI Image Segmentation and Survival Prediction.}},
  author = {Jia-Lien Hsu and Pei-Yu Yu},
  journal = {Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/diagnostics16193210},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882365},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - CSFINet-Based Multimodal MRI Image Segmentation and Survival Prediction.
AU  - Jia-Lien Hsu
AU  - Pei-Yu Yu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/02
JO  - Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
DO  - 10.3390/diagnostics16193210
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882365
AB  - Background: Brain tumors are highly lethal malignant neoplasms, for which accurate tumor segmentation and survival-day prediction are critical to treatment planning and prognostic assessment. This study establishes an exploratory two-stage analytical framework spanning multimodal MRI tumor segmentation and survival-day prediction. Methods: The study is based on the BraTS 2020 multimodal MRI dataset, employing four imaging modalities-T1, T1ce, T2, and FLAIR-with patient age and extent-of-resection status as candidate clinical features. The 235 cases with survival labels were split at the patient level (188 training, 47 test; single 80:20 split). In the first stage, CSFINet is used for brain tumor segmentation; in the second stage, the resulting binary whole-tumor mask, age, and resection status serve as inputs for survival-day prediction. The survival models are trained on the ground-truth whole-tumor masks but evaluated on the masks predicted by CSFINet, and the survival training runs were not seeded. Four models-image-only, image with age, image with resection status, and image with both-are constructed for ablation experiments, and Gradient SHAP is introduced for interpretability analysis. Results: CSFINet achieves a Mean Dice, Mean Precision, and Mean Recall of 0.7849±0.1937, 0.8739±0.1978, and 0.7480±0.1936, compared with 0.5084, 0.8676, and 0.3822 for a U-Net baseline trained in this study under an identical configuration. The gains are in Dice and recall; the precision difference (+0.0063, 95% CI -0.0601 to 0.1086) is not distinguishable from zero. This comparison is internal to the present study; published BraTS 2020 results were obtained under different evaluation protocols and are not directly comparable. The model combining imaging features with age yields the lowest error, achieving a mean absolute error of 251.69 days (95% CI [186.56, 336.79])-lower than the 279.41 days obtained by the image-only model-whereas incorporating resection status does not lead to further improvement. Conclusions: CSFINet improves whole-tumor segmentation relative to this identically configured U-Net baseline-not relative to the published state of the art-and the inclusion of age was associated with a lower survival-day prediction error in this study. The survival findings are exploratory and cohort-specific: an MAE of 252 days is roughly 57% of the reported median survival of glioblastoma and is not clinically actionable, and the web interface is a research prototype. This study establishes an integrated analytical pipeline spanning tumor segmentation, survival-day prediction, and result visualization, serving as a preliminary reference for brain tumor image analysis and prognostic assessment. These are exploratory, single-cohort associations obtained from BraTS 2020; they do not establish a causal relationship between the clinical variables and survival, and they have not been externally validated.
SN  - 2075-4418
ER  -