Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,839 studies31 sourcesUpdated 35 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYInternet interventions

The perceived utility and scope of ecological momentary assessment and interventions for non-suicidal self-injury: A needs-based dynamic risk perspective

4 affiliations
  1. 1Center for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Belgium
  2. 2Research Unit Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium
  3. 3School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
  4. 4Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, the Netherlands

Abstract

Background: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is characterized by rapid within-person fluctuations in thoughts and urges. Yet, treatments rely on retrospective and static approaches for assessments and interventions. Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) and Ecological Momentary Interventions (EMIs) may enable more dynamic support in real time. This study examined the perceived utility and scope of these new digital modalities from the perspectives of treatment-seeking individuals and mental health professionals.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 treatment-seeking individuals engaging in NSSI, after completing a four-week EMA period, and with 14 professionals who used EMA in treatment. Interviews explored experiences with EMA and perspectives on EMIs and were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Three themes were identified. First, EMA and EMIs were perceived as extending therapeutic support by enhancing awareness, reflection, and skill use in daily life. Second, participants emphasized that EMIs must be tailored to changing needs in function of changing risk. This informed the development of a Needs-Based Dynamic Risk and Intervention Model for NSSI, distinguishing needs and interventions through a traffic-light analogy across resilient (i.e., mental health promotion), emerging risk (i.e., vulnerability regulation), and high risk (i.e., behavioral interruption) states. Third, EMIs were viewed as valuable when embedded in blended care and implemented through shared decision-making, balancing system- and user-initiated support.

Conclusion: Integrating EMA and EMIs into treatment has potential to provide needs-tailored support for individuals who self-injure. Future work should focus on empirically validating the proposed dynamic model and co-designing EMI components that address fluctuating needs in daily life.

Related

  1. From movement to mood regulation: exercise-based digital interventions using mobile health and ecological momentary assessment for mental health and cognitive function in older adults: a narrative review
    Wenjie Wu
    Frontiers in psychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPhysiologyEurope PMCCrossref
  2. Leveraging ecological momentary assessment and dynamic structural equation modeling to identify idiographic antecedents of child irritability and defiance
    Shannon Shaughnessy, Spencer C. Evans
    PsyArXivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  3. Ecological momentary assessment of anxiety and depression in individuals with early-treated phenylketonuria
    B. E. Hayse, S. P. Lane, S. Singh +3
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthmedRxiv
  4. An Experimental Evaluation of Assessment Reactivity in Ecological Momentary Assessment of Alcoholics Anonymous Involvement and Alcohol-Related Outcomes: One Day at a Time
    Mason L. Hatwan, Matthew R. Pearson, J. Scott Tonigan
    Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive BehaviorsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textEpidemiology & public healthPMC
  5. Baseline depressive-symptom severity and divergent psychological trajectories during GIP and/or GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy: a prospective ecological momentary assessment study
    Aika Miya, Michihiro Kaneko, Yuka Ozaki +2
    Diabetology internationalPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textEndocrinology & metabolismPMC
BibTeX
@article{luijsmans2026perceived,
  title = {{The perceived utility and scope of ecological momentary assessment and interventions for non-suicidal self-injury: A needs-based dynamic risk perspective}},
  author = {Mirthe Luijsmans and Laurence Claes and Ruth Tatnell and Marlies Houben and Thomas Vaessen and Tom Smeets and Inez Myin-Germeys and Glenn Kiekens},
  journal = {Internet interventions},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.invent.2026.101014},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13720625},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The perceived utility and scope of ecological momentary assessment and interventions for non-suicidal self-injury: A needs-based dynamic risk perspective
AU  - Mirthe Luijsmans
AU  - Laurence Claes
AU  - Ruth Tatnell
AU  - Marlies Houben
AU  - Thomas Vaessen
AU  - Tom Smeets
AU  - Inez Myin-Germeys
AU  - Glenn Kiekens
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/24
JO  - Internet interventions
DO  - 10.1016/j.invent.2026.101014
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13720625
AB  - Background: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is characterized by rapid within-person fluctuations in thoughts and urges. Yet, treatments rely on retrospective and static approaches for assessments and interventions. Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) and Ecological Momentary Interventions (EMIs) may enable more dynamic support in real time. This study examined the perceived utility and scope of these new digital modalities from the perspectives of treatment-seeking individuals and mental health professionals.  Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 treatment-seeking individuals engaging in NSSI, after completing a four-week EMA period, and with 14 professionals who used EMA in treatment. Interviews explored experiences with EMA and perspectives on EMIs and were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.  Results: Three themes were identified. First, EMA and EMIs were perceived as extending therapeutic support by enhancing awareness, reflection, and skill use in daily life. Second, participants emphasized that EMIs must be tailored to changing needs in function of changing risk. This informed the development of a Needs-Based Dynamic Risk and Intervention Model for NSSI, distinguishing needs and interventions through a traffic-light analogy across resilient (i.e., mental health promotion), emerging risk (i.e., vulnerability regulation), and high risk (i.e., behavioral interruption) states. Third, EMIs were viewed as valuable when embedded in blended care and implemented through shared decision-making, balancing system- and user-initiated support.  Conclusion: Integrating EMA and EMIs into treatment has potential to provide needs-tailored support for individuals who self-injure. Future work should focus on empirically validating the proposed dynamic model and co-designing EMI components that address fluctuating needs in daily life.
SN  - 2214-7829
ER  -