Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,713 studies31 sourcesUpdated 9 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Regime-Conditioned Evaluation in Multi-Context Bayesian Optimization

Abstract

Published transfer-BO comparisons often estimate an average treatment effect of acquisition choice over hidden regime variables, while practitioners need the conditional effect for their specific prior quality, budget ratio, and metric. An audit of 40 transfer-BO papers from NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, AISTATS, UAI, TMLR, JMLR, and AutoML-Conf (2022-2025) finds that 98% never vary B/|A| as a controlled axis. On the same GDSC2 benchmark, changing only the budget reverses the ranking: at B=50, Greedy outperforms UCB by 0.050 Hit@1, while at B=100, UCB outperforms Greedy by 0.035. We capture this transition with the Portable Regime Score PRS=(B/|A|)(1-rho), where rho is the prior rank correlation and can be estimated from pilot contexts before the main comparison. Across 79 conditions spanning chemistry, drug-response biology, and HPO, a hierarchical model gives beta=0.50 (p=1.1e-9), and 19% of conditions fall in an equivalence zone where |advantage|<0.01 Hit@1. In five published reversal cases, PRS predicts the winner from pre-comparison observables. A No-Free-Leaderboard proposition explains why unconditional rankings are unstable: when CATE changes sign across regimes, the reported ATE becomes a function of benchmark mixture. RegimePlanner, which estimates rho online and switches acquisition accordingly, wins all 16 HPO-B search spaces at B=100 and exceeds the matched {Greedy,UCB} per-context oracle on GDSC2 by 18%. Pre-registered predictions achieve 27/40=67.5% overall accuracy and above 90% within EMA prior families. The practical protocol is simple: report B/|A|, rho, K, and metric alongside any claimed acquisition advantage.

Related

  1. Work While They Sleep: Exploiting Evaluation Latency for Fully Bayesian Optimization
    Gustavo Sutter, Alejandro Comas-Leon, David Holzmüller +4
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Hierarchical Regime-Conditioned Ornstein–Uhlenbeck Monitoring for Thermal Control in Memory Reliability Test Equipment
    Seunghwan Song
    MathematicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General mathematicsCrossref
  3. Generative Priors Conditioned on Natural Language for Bayesian Inversion in PDEs
    Pengyu Zhang, Mark Girolami, Arnaud Vadeboncoeur
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Borrowing Space, Clustering Temporal Dynamics: Bayesian Regime Mapping and Spatial Prediction for European PM10
    Luca Aiello, Lucia Clarotto
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. A Bayesian Hidden Markov Model with Singh--Maddala Emission Distributions for Heavy-Tailed Regime-Switching Time Series
    Safaa K. Kadhem
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{thomas2026regimeconditioned,
  title = {{Regime-Conditioned Evaluation in Multi-Context Bayesian Optimization}},
  author = {Noel Thomas},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2605.04895},
  eprint = {2605.04895},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04895},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Regime-Conditioned Evaluation in Multi-Context Bayesian Optimization
AU  - Noel Thomas
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/15
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2605.04895
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04895
AB  - Published transfer-BO comparisons often estimate an average treatment effect of acquisition choice over hidden regime variables, while practitioners need the conditional effect for their specific prior quality, budget ratio, and metric. An audit of 40 transfer-BO papers from NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, AISTATS, UAI, TMLR, JMLR, and AutoML-Conf (2022-2025) finds that 98% never vary B/|A| as a controlled axis. On the same GDSC2 benchmark, changing only the budget reverses the ranking: at B=50, Greedy outperforms UCB by 0.050 Hit@1, while at B=100, UCB outperforms Greedy by 0.035. We capture this transition with the Portable Regime Score PRS=(B/|A|)(1-rho), where rho is the prior rank correlation and can be estimated from pilot contexts before the main comparison. Across 79 conditions spanning chemistry, drug-response biology, and HPO, a hierarchical model gives beta=0.50 (p=1.1e-9), and 19% of conditions fall in an equivalence zone where |advantage|<0.01 Hit@1. In five published reversal cases, PRS predicts the winner from pre-comparison observables. A No-Free-Leaderboard proposition explains why unconditional rankings are unstable: when CATE changes sign across regimes, the reported ATE becomes a function of benchmark mixture. RegimePlanner, which estimates rho online and switches acquisition accordingly, wins all 16 HPO-B search spaces at B=100 and exceeds the matched {Greedy,UCB} per-context oracle on GDSC2 by 18%. Pre-registered predictions achieve 27/40=67.5% overall accuracy and above 90% within EMA prior families. The practical protocol is simple: report B/|A|, rho, K, and metric alongside any claimed acquisition advantage.
ER  -