Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0arXiv

Solving the Nonlinear Westervelt Equation in Ultrasound Propagation Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Abstract

Modeling the nonlinear acoustic wave propagation in biological tissues needs accuracy, especially in ultrasound imaging and therapeutic applications. The 1D Westervelt equation, pxx − ptt + γ pttt + η (p2)tt=0, could be used to describe a finite-amplitude ultrasound propagation in these tissues. This equation accounts for nonlinearity, η, and attenuation, γ. To solve this equation, we observe that traditional solvers may struggle to do so correctly. This is due to the difficulties arising from the nonlinear nature of the equation. We solve the equation by defining three synthetic cases - linear (η=0.001, γ=10−6), shock-dominated (η=0.02, γ=10−6), and dissipation-dominated (η=0.01, γ=5×10−4) - and using Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) to showcase the solution. A sinusoidal activation function is used to capture the oscillatory behavior of the problem. The results of our study, with PDE residual converging to at least 10−6, boundary condition loss to 10−5, and the PINN loss converging to 10−5 for each case at 30,000 epochs, show that γ scales the rate of amplitude decay, while η governs frequency-dependent phase speeds.

Related

  1. Multi parameter identification in the nonlinear periodic Westervelt equation
    Benjamin Rainer, Barbara Kaltenbacher
    arXivPreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  2. Free Boundary Propagation of a Thin-Film Equation with Nonlinear Diffusion: Scale-Consistent Methods for Optimal Results
    Joshua Utley
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  3. An Energy-based discontinuous Galerkin method for the Westervelt equation with absorbing boundary conditions
    Yiwei Wang, Lu Zhang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  4. Moments propagation in the Vlasov equation and application to the Navier-Stokes-Vlasov equations
    Yanqing Wang, Wei Wei, Yulin Ye +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  5. PROPAGATION ESTIMATES FOR THE MANY-BODY BOSON STAR EQUATION
    Sébastien Breteaux, Charlotte Dietze, Jérémy Faupin +2
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textMathematical physicsHALarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{joel2026solving,
  title = {{Solving the Nonlinear Westervelt Equation in Ultrasound Propagation Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks}},
  author = {Luke Oluwaseye Joel},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.05130},
  eprint = {2611.05130},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05130},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Solving the Nonlinear Westervelt Equation in Ultrasound Propagation Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks
AU  - Luke Oluwaseye Joel
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/03
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.05130
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05130
AB  - Modeling the nonlinear acoustic wave propagation in biological tissues needs accuracy, especially in ultrasound imaging and therapeutic applications. The 1D Westervelt equation, p_xx − p_tt + γ p_ttt + η (p^2)_tt=0, could be used to describe a finite-amplitude ultrasound propagation in these tissues. This equation accounts for nonlinearity, η, and attenuation, γ. To solve this equation, we observe that traditional solvers may struggle to do so correctly. This is due to the difficulties arising from the nonlinear nature of the equation. We solve the equation by defining three synthetic cases - linear (η=0.001, γ=10^−6), shock-dominated (η=0.02, γ=10^−6), and dissipation-dominated (η=0.01, γ=5×10^−4) - and using Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) to showcase the solution. A sinusoidal activation function is used to capture the oscillatory behavior of the problem. The results of our study, with PDE residual converging to at least 10^−6, boundary condition loss to 10^−5, and the PINN loss converging to 10^−5 for each case at 30,000 epochs, show that γ scales the rate of amplitude decay, while η governs frequency-dependent phase speeds.
ER  -