Person-centered, trauma-informed care and support for resilience after intimate partner violence: an integrative review through a neurobiological lens
- 1Institution for Health Sciences, University West
- 2Center for Holistic Psychiatry Research (CHoPy)
- 3High Institute of Nursing Professions and Health Techniques Fez, Dhar El Mehraz Hôpital Al Ghassani
Abstract
Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a major global public health concern with severe physical, psychological, and social consequences, strongly associated with chronic stress and diminished wellbeing. IPV often remains under-identified within healthcare and social care settings, with shame, guilt, and stigma acting as barriers to help-seeking. Resilience—the capacity to regulate emotion, adapt, and recover following adversity—has emerged as a central concept in understanding recovery after IPV exposure. Person-centered, trauma-informed care facilities recovery by grounding care in the individual's needs, experiences, and resources and by accounting for how trauma affects the body and the capacity to trust care practitioners.
Aim: The aim of this study was to analyze person-centered care and support interventions aimed at strengthening resilience in individuals exposed to IPV.
Methods: An integrative literature review was conducted following Whittemdore and Knafl's methodology. It included 12 peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and March 2026, retrieved from CINAHL and APA PsycInfo. Nine studies were qualitative, two quantitative, and one mixed methods; all appraised using the CASP framework.
Results: Findings were based on 544 participants exposed to IPV (537 women, 7 men, aged 15–73 years), alongside the perspectives of 31 care and support professionals, drawn from studies conducted across eight countries. Three main themes were identified: a safe, trusting, and accessible care relationship as a foundation for resilience; empowerment through participation, autonomy, and reclaiming control; and the mobilization of individual and social resources for long-term recovery, encompassing strength-based coping and supportive networks. Person-centered, trauma-informed care characterized by safety, trust, and genuine participation was central to strengthening resilience. Organizational barriers, along with gendered dynamics affecting autonomy could hinder access to support and recovery.
Conclusion: Person-centered, trauma-informed care and support can strengthen resilience by fostering trust, participation, and empowerment. Resilience emerged as a dynamic, nonlinear process shaped by individual resources, relationships with care and support staff, and structural conditions. Trauma's effects on the nervous system offer a neurobiological basis for why consistency, predictability, and genuine attentiveness are prerequisites for effective care, not merely good practice. These findings underscore the need for training in trauma-informed, person-centered approaches across all professions supporting individuals exposed to IPV.
Related
- The Longitudinal THRIVE study Protocol: Social and Neurobiological Mechanisms of Risk and Resilience in Young People with a History of Childhood Adversity
- Longitudinal THRIVE study protocol: social and neurobiological mechanisms of risk and resilience in young people with a history of childhood adversity
- A thalamus-centered network model of restless legs syndrome: an integrative hypothesis illustrated by three clinical phenotypes
- Integrative bulk and single-cell transcriptomic analysis identifies a PLAUR-centered macrophage-associated programmed cell death signature in type A aortic dissection
- Family-Centered Care and Outcomes of Child Flourishing and Family Resilience and Connection
BibTeX
@article{kerekes2026personcentered,
title = {{Person-centered, trauma-informed care and support for resilience after intimate partner violence: an integrative review through a neurobiological lens}},
author = {Nóra Kerekes and Caroline Ackemo and Erika Alfredsson and Anis Sfendla},
journal = {Frontiers in Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1962315},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1962315/full},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Person-centered, trauma-informed care and support for resilience after intimate partner violence: an integrative review through a neurobiological lens
AU - Nóra Kerekes
AU - Caroline Ackemo
AU - Erika Alfredsson
AU - Anis Sfendla
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/27
JO - Frontiers in Public Health
DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1962315
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1962315/full
AB - Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a major global public health concern with severe physical, psychological, and social consequences, strongly associated with chronic stress and diminished wellbeing. IPV often remains under-identified within healthcare and social care settings, with shame, guilt, and stigma acting as barriers to help-seeking. Resilience—the capacity to regulate emotion, adapt, and recover following adversity—has emerged as a central concept in understanding recovery after IPV exposure. Person-centered, trauma-informed care facilities recovery by grounding care in the individual's needs, experiences, and resources and by accounting for how trauma affects the body and the capacity to trust care practitioners. Aim: The aim of this study was to analyze person-centered care and support interventions aimed at strengthening resilience in individuals exposed to IPV. Methods: An integrative literature review was conducted following Whittemdore and Knafl's methodology. It included 12 peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and March 2026, retrieved from CINAHL and APA PsycInfo. Nine studies were qualitative, two quantitative, and one mixed methods; all appraised using the CASP framework. Results: Findings were based on 544 participants exposed to IPV (537 women, 7 men, aged 15–73 years), alongside the perspectives of 31 care and support professionals, drawn from studies conducted across eight countries. Three main themes were identified: a safe, trusting, and accessible care relationship as a foundation for resilience; empowerment through participation, autonomy, and reclaiming control; and the mobilization of individual and social resources for long-term recovery, encompassing strength-based coping and supportive networks. Person-centered, trauma-informed care characterized by safety, trust, and genuine participation was central to strengthening resilience. Organizational barriers, along with gendered dynamics affecting autonomy could hinder access to support and recovery. Conclusion: Person-centered, trauma-informed care and support can strengthen resilience by fostering trust, participation, and empowerment. Resilience emerged as a dynamic, nonlinear process shaped by individual resources, relationships with care and support staff, and structural conditions. Trauma's effects on the nervous system offer a neurobiological basis for why consistency, predictability, and genuine attentiveness are prerequisites for effective care, not merely good practice. These findings underscore the need for training in trauma-informed, person-centered approaches across all professions supporting individuals exposed to IPV.
SN - 2296-2565
ER -