Interplay of Anticipatory Curiosity and Reactive Surprise drive epistemic motivation and lasting memory updating
Abstract
The need to correct erroneous beliefs is inevitable, especially in a world where information propagates faster than it can be verified. However, passive exposure to corrections is often inadequate for memory updating. Prospective motivational states like curiosity and error-evoked signals like surprise have each been shown to motivate learning and influence memory, yet how they interact to shape information-seeking and memory updating remains unknown. Here, we demonstrate that anticipatory curiosity and post-error surprise serve as distinct, compensatory drivers of epistemic motivation and memory updating. Using a paradigm designed to evoke high-confidence errors, we assessed curiosity, surprise, information seeking, and memory updating in participants who were tested either immediately or after a 24-hour delay. We found that while memory updating tested after 24 hours was weaker (relative to immediate testing), active information-seeking protected updated memories from decay. Crucially, when initial curiosity was low, post-error surprise acted as a compensatory trigger to increase information-seeking and durable memory updating. Mediation analyses showed that error-evoked epistemic signals enhanced durable memory updating both directly and indirectly by promoting information-seeking decisions. These findings highlight that when curiosity is lacking, evoking salient errors can promote both active information-seeking and durable memory updating necessary for correcting misconceptions.
Related
- What keeps gig workers motivated? A typology of the intrinsic-extrinsic motivation interplay in the digital gig economy
- ADA Yonath (1939–2026): Curiosity Without Limits
- Curiosity shapes brain-like architectures and functions
- How social value guides curiosity, information search, and memory in younger and older adults
- Anticipatory Gaze Reveals Individual Differences in Implicit Sequence Learning Before Motor Performance
BibTeX
@misc{poh2026interplay,
title = {{Interplay of Anticipatory Curiosity and Reactive Surprise drive epistemic motivation and lasting memory updating}},
author = {Jia-Hou Poh and Abigail Hsiung and Paige Sevchik and Reah Syed and Scott A. Huettel and R. Alison Adcock},
howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.31234/osf.io/yx6ek_v1},
url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/yx6ek_v1/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Interplay of Anticipatory Curiosity and Reactive Surprise drive epistemic motivation and lasting memory updating
AU - Jia-Hou Poh
AU - Abigail Hsiung
AU - Paige Sevchik
AU - Reah Syed
AU - Scott A. Huettel
AU - R. Alison Adcock
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/08
PB - PsyArXiv
DO - 10.31234/osf.io/yx6ek_v1
UR - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/yx6ek_v1/
AB - The need to correct erroneous beliefs is inevitable, especially in a world where information propagates faster than it can be verified. However, passive exposure to corrections is often inadequate for memory updating. Prospective motivational states like curiosity and error-evoked signals like surprise have each been shown to motivate learning and influence memory, yet how they interact to shape information-seeking and memory updating remains unknown. Here, we demonstrate that anticipatory curiosity and post-error surprise serve as distinct, compensatory drivers of epistemic motivation and memory updating. Using a paradigm designed to evoke high-confidence errors, we assessed curiosity, surprise, information seeking, and memory updating in participants who were tested either immediately or after a 24-hour delay. We found that while memory updating tested after 24 hours was weaker (relative to immediate testing), active information-seeking protected updated memories from decay. Crucially, when initial curiosity was low, post-error surprise acted as a compensatory trigger to increase information-seeking and durable memory updating. Mediation analyses showed that error-evoked epistemic signals enhanced durable memory updating both directly and indirectly by promoting information-seeking decisions. These findings highlight that when curiosity is lacking, evoking salient errors can promote both active information-seeking and durable memory updating necessary for correcting misconceptions.
ER -