Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 52 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Pseudoentanglement in constant depth: How trivial states can have non-trivial entanglement structure

Abstract

We construct a family of 2D-local constant-depth quantum circuits that output states whose entanglement entropy across a specified cut cannot be estimated in quantum polynomial time. As constant-depth quantum circuits can be learned from polynomially many quantum samples, our resulting pseudoentangled states are implicitly public-key and not pseudorandom. This separates pseudoentanglement from pseudorandomness in the shallow-circuit regime: the former is possible, while the latter is not. The construction is based on the quantum intractability of the Dense-Sparse Learning Parity with Noise problem introduced in [DJ25] and uses a bounded-fan-in, bounded-fan-out classical randomized encoding for linear maps x ↦ Mx, which could be of independent interest. As applications, we obtain quantum hardness for the problem of learning the entanglement structure (across a fixed cut) of the ground-state of 1D and 2D local Hamiltonians. The 1D Hamiltonian has an inverse polynomial gap, whereas the 2D one has a constant gap. This complements the result of [BZZ24] that showed only factoring-based hardness for the 1D case, though achieving a volume versus area entanglement difference.

Related

  1. An entanglement band structure for general multiqubit states
    Chon-Fai Kam
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. Structure of Measurement-Induced Entanglement in Infinite-Randomness Critical States
    Oliver Breach
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCondensed matterQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Reducing the Entanglement Cost of Distributed Bipartite Quantum Computation with Constant Qubit Overhead
    Kosuke Matsui, Jun-Yi Wu, Min-Hsiu Hsieh +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Analytic detector responses and entanglement in constant-curvature spacetimes
    Dyuman Bhattacharya, Jiayue Yang, Ming Zhang +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGravitation & general relativityHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  5. Approximating Local Properties by Tensor Network States With Constant Bond Dimension
    Yichen Huang
    IEEE Transactions on Information TheoryPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text17 citedAtomic, molecular & optical physicsOpenAlex
BibTeX
@misc{gheorghiu2026pseudoentanglement,
  title = {{Pseudoentanglement in constant depth: How trivial states can have non-trivial entanglement structure}},
  author = {Alexandru Gheorghiu},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2605.31448},
  eprint = {2605.31448},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31448},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Pseudoentanglement in constant depth: How trivial states can have non-trivial entanglement structure
AU  - Alexandru Gheorghiu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2605.31448
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31448
AB  - We construct a family of 2D-local constant-depth quantum circuits that output states whose entanglement entropy across a specified cut cannot be estimated in quantum polynomial time. As constant-depth quantum circuits can be learned from polynomially many quantum samples, our resulting pseudoentangled states are implicitly public-key and not pseudorandom. This separates pseudoentanglement from pseudorandomness in the shallow-circuit regime: the former is possible, while the latter is not. The construction is based on the quantum intractability of the Dense-Sparse Learning Parity with Noise problem introduced in [DJ25] and uses a bounded-fan-in, bounded-fan-out classical randomized encoding for linear maps x ↦ Mx, which could be of independent interest. As applications, we obtain quantum hardness for the problem of learning the entanglement structure (across a fixed cut) of the ground-state of 1D and 2D local Hamiltonians. The 1D Hamiltonian has an inverse polynomial gap, whereas the 2D one has a constant gap. This complements the result of [BZZ24] that showed only factoring-based hardness for the 1D case, though achieving a volume versus area entanglement difference.
ER  -