PreprintAll rights reservedbioRxiv
Landscape restoration strategies differ in their predicted benefits for species persistence
- 1Department of Zoology, Conservation Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Related
- Ecologically based agriculture benefits earthworms in Argentina’s large-scale systems: farm-level strategies matter
- Audio embeddings identify novel sounds and track soundscape change within a tropical restoration landscape
- Sharp transitions between optimal therapy regimes reveal robust dosing strategies against drug-induced persistence
- Tropical rainforest versus savannah: Biome-specific landscape structure mediates adaptive strategies and resilience to environmental change
- BamA as a next-generation antibacterial target: mechanistic insights, inhibitor landscape, and rational drug design strategies
BibTeX
@misc{bauknecht2026landscape,
title = {{Landscape restoration strategies differ in their predicted benefits for species persistence}},
author = {R. Bauknecht and R. J. Fletcher},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.06.756954},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.06.756954v1},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Landscape restoration strategies differ in their predicted benefits for species persistence
AU - R. Bauknecht
AU - R. J. Fletcher
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/06
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.06.756954
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.06.756954v1
ER -