Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 22 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0arXiv

Drag reduction and subcritical turbulence in controlled pipe flows

Abstract

Pipe flow controlled by streamwise-travelling waves of azimuthal wall velocity is studied using direct numerical simulations at a bulk Reynolds number Reb=4900. A comprehensive analysis of drag reduction shows that the flow response differs fundamentally from that of channel flow. Under suitable forcing, pipe flow relaminarizes, whereas channel flow does not. Depending on the control parameters, the flow exhibits the spatially localized turbulent state characteristic of transitional pipe flow, with turbulent puffs persisting at bulk Reynolds numbers up to three times higher than in the uncontrolled case. The bulk Reynolds number alone does not determine the onset of localization. Moreover, drag reduction, which alters the natural relation between bulk and friction velocities, is insufficient to identify a universal onset criterion. An intermittency indicator based on the spatial variance of the cross-sectional turbulent kinetic energy relates the emergence of localized turbulence to the low wall friction produced by the control, although the correspondence is not one-to-one. Despite their qualitative resemblance to canonical turbulent puffs, the controlled puffs exhibit distinct properties; for example, their fronts may propagate faster than the bulk flow. Overall, this work provides a comprehensive characterization of the subcritical turbulent state and its turbulent puffs in controlled pipe flow, and offers a new perspective on control strategies that aim at flow relaminarization.

Related

  1. Spatially developing drag reduction across a finite oscillating wall
    Marco Galli, Nicolò Scaiola, Ferdinand F. J. Schrijer +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textFluid dynamicsarXiv
  2. Net drag reduction in turbulent pipe flow by airfoil-section grids concentrated near the wall
    Takuya Masuda
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textFluid dynamicsarXiv
  3. Bi-stable Nonlinear Energy Sinks (BNESs) for Response Mitigation and Drag Reduction of Subsea Cables Undergoing Vortex-induced Vibrations
    Anargyros Michaloliakos, Ryan Davies, Matthew Hall +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textFluid dynamicsarXiv
  4. Anisotropy and intermittency in drift-wave turbulence with zonal flows: a two-dimensional continuous wavelet analysis
    Katsunori Yoshimatsu, Zetao Lin, Hideaki Miura +1
    Physics of PlasmasPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textFluid dynamicsPlasma physicsHAL
  5. Impact of Drag Force between Droplet and Gas on Suppression of a Buoyancy-Controlled Fire via Water Mist
    Marianne Houndekon, Hui-Ying Wang, Bruno Coudour +1
    Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences TechnologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral physicsHAL
BibTeX
@misc{gallorini2026drag,
  title = {{Drag reduction and subcritical turbulence in controlled pipe flows}},
  author = {Emanuele Gallorini and Daniele Massaro and Philipp Schlatter and Maurizio Quadrio},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.30452},
  eprint = {2608.30452},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30452},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Drag reduction and subcritical turbulence in controlled pipe flows
AU  - Emanuele Gallorini
AU  - Daniele Massaro
AU  - Philipp Schlatter
AU  - Maurizio Quadrio
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/31
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.30452
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30452
AB  - Pipe flow controlled by streamwise-travelling waves of azimuthal wall velocity is studied using direct numerical simulations at a bulk Reynolds number Re_b=4900. A comprehensive analysis of drag reduction shows that the flow response differs fundamentally from that of channel flow. Under suitable forcing, pipe flow relaminarizes, whereas channel flow does not. Depending on the control parameters, the flow exhibits the spatially localized turbulent state characteristic of transitional pipe flow, with turbulent puffs persisting at bulk Reynolds numbers up to three times higher than in the uncontrolled case. The bulk Reynolds number alone does not determine the onset of localization. Moreover, drag reduction, which alters the natural relation between bulk and friction velocities, is insufficient to identify a universal onset criterion. An intermittency indicator based on the spatial variance of the cross-sectional turbulent kinetic energy relates the emergence of localized turbulence to the low wall friction produced by the control, although the correspondence is not one-to-one. Despite their qualitative resemblance to canonical turbulent puffs, the controlled puffs exhibit distinct properties; for example, their fronts may propagate faster than the bulk flow. Overall, this work provides a comprehensive characterization of the subcritical turbulent state and its turbulent puffs in controlled pipe flow, and offers a new perspective on control strategies that aim at flow relaminarization.
ER  -