Learning from social assessments of innovative non-sewered sanitation in eThekwini
6 affiliations
- 1School of Agriculture and Environmental Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
- 2WASH R&D Centre, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
- 3Independent Scholar, Cape Town, South Africa
- 4Independent Scholar, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
- 5School of Social Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
- 6Geography and the Lived Environment, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Abstract
As non-sewered sanitation (NSS) is being designed, developed, tested and rolled out, there is widespread support for the integration of social science. Yet what, precisely, social science can and should do remains much less clear. This paper explains the specific approach of social assessments, a process for analysing the context in which NSS exists, and how this context might impact NSS. Social assessments can be more resource intensive than more narrow approaches, making it important to understand its contributions and why it might contribute to NSS. Here, we draw on data from six different social assessment processes on NSS in eThekwini Municipal Area, showing how the questions, methodology and contributions changed. What has resulted from our learnings is not a set process, but ongoing experimentation with and adoption of diverse methods that respond to the particular goals of research teams in specific sites. We explain five potential contributions of social assessment: a) it can improve technologies; b) it can enable users to better understand technologies and interventions, enabling a deeper form of participation; c) broadens the framing of what matters for NSS, showing the relevance and potential changes of factors such as governance arrangements, gender dynamics, and resource costs; d) it offers specialist analysis of technologies’ relationship with the wider context; and e) it impacts relationships, potentially shifting power and building trust. We conclude by urging more explicit attention to the diverse ways of undertaking social science how it can contribute to NSS.
Related
- Predictors of COVID-19 vaccination status among youth in eThekwini, South Africa: results from the AYAZAZI RIGHTS study
- Water, sanitation, and hygiene in soil-transmitted helminth control: A scoping review of evidence gaps across transmission pathways
- Willingness-to-pay for container-based sanitation and implications for targeted subsidy design in urban Haiti
- eNeuro Assessments: A Standardized Way to Communicate Research Quality
- Widefield OCT-Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography Assessments of Nonperfusion in Diabetic Retinopathy and Edema Treated with Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
BibTeX
@article{sutherland2026learning,
title = {{Learning from social assessments of innovative non-sewered sanitation in eThekwini}},
author = {Catherine Sutherland and Anthony Odili and Msimelelo Gqaleni and Sibongile Buthelezi and Duduzile Khumalo and Fanelesibonge Magwaza and Bahle Mazeka and Lindani Mtshali and Mary Lawhon},
journal = {PLOS Water},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pwat.0000527},
url = {https://journals.plos.org/water/article?id=10.1371/journal.pwat.0000527},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Learning from social assessments of innovative non-sewered sanitation in eThekwini
AU - Catherine Sutherland
AU - Anthony Odili
AU - Msimelelo Gqaleni
AU - Sibongile Buthelezi
AU - Duduzile Khumalo
AU - Fanelesibonge Magwaza
AU - Bahle Mazeka
AU - Lindani Mtshali
AU - Mary Lawhon
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/14
JO - PLOS Water
DO - 10.1371/journal.pwat.0000527
UR - https://journals.plos.org/water/article?id=10.1371/journal.pwat.0000527
AB - As non-sewered sanitation (NSS) is being designed, developed, tested and rolled out, there is widespread support for the integration of social science. Yet what, precisely, social science can and should do remains much less clear. This paper explains the specific approach of social assessments, a process for analysing the context in which NSS exists, and how this context might impact NSS. Social assessments can be more resource intensive than more narrow approaches, making it important to understand its contributions and why it might contribute to NSS. Here, we draw on data from six different social assessment processes on NSS in eThekwini Municipal Area, showing how the questions, methodology and contributions changed. What has resulted from our learnings is not a set process, but ongoing experimentation with and adoption of diverse methods that respond to the particular goals of research teams in specific sites. We explain five potential contributions of social assessment: a) it can improve technologies; b) it can enable users to better understand technologies and interventions, enabling a deeper form of participation; c) broadens the framing of what matters for NSS, showing the relevance and potential changes of factors such as governance arrangements, gender dynamics, and resource costs; d) it offers specialist analysis of technologies’ relationship with the wider context; and e) it impacts relationships, potentially shifting power and building trust. We conclude by urging more explicit attention to the diverse ways of undertaking social science how it can contribute to NSS.
SN - 2767-3219
ER -