Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,642 studies31 sourcesUpdated 12 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Clinical Medicine

Clinical Application of Suture Distraction Technique for Closure of Decompression Incisions Following Lower-Leg Compartment Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Study

  1. 1Beijing Jishuitan Hospital Guizhou Hospital, Guiyang 550014, China
  2. 2Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100035, China

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the suture distraction technique (SDT) for closing decompression wounds resulting from acute compartment syndrome (ACS) of the lower leg, and to examine whether it may serve as an alternative to skin grafting (SG). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 67 patients who received decompressive fasciotomy for lower-leg ACS from January 2018 to June 2025. Of these, 31 were managed with SDT and 36 with SG. Wound healing time served as the primary outcome; secondary outcomes comprised the number of operations, hospital stay, wound-closure-related costs, sensory function, Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) scores, donor-site injury, and infection rate. Results: The two groups were broadly similar in baseline characteristics. Compared with the SG group, the SDT group required fewer operations (median 1.0 vs. 2.0), achieved faster wound healing (14.0 vs. 18.5 days), had shorter hospital stays (27.0 vs. 46.0 days), and incurred lower wound-closure-related costs (1656 vs. 14,926.5 CNY) (all p < 0.001). VSS scores favored the SDT group (0.0 vs. 4.0, p < 0.001). All SDT patients preserved normal sensation, whereas all SG patients experienced hypoesthesia (p < 0.001). As an inherent consequence of skin grafting, every grafted patient had a donor-site wound, whereas no SDT patient required grafting and therefore had none; donor-site morbidity was described descriptively rather than compared statistically. The infection rate did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.495); however, given the small number of events, no firm conclusion could be drawn. In the parsimonious adjusted analysis, the SG group had a significantly longer wound healing time (adjusted ratio, 1.412; 95% CI, 1.303 to 1.531; p < 0.001). The time from injury to fasciotomy was significantly longer in the SG group than in the SDT group (median 5.7 vs. 4.5 h; p = 0.012). Conclusions: Within this single-center retrospective cohort, SDT was linked to fewer operations, shorter wound healing time and hospital stay, and reduced costs, while preserving sensation and avoiding donor-site morbidity. As the decompression incision in ACS involves no actual loss of skin, this wound type may be particularly well suited to SDT, which enabled complete closure without skin grafting in the present cohort. These findings merit confirmation through prospective comparative studies.

Related

  1. Clinical Outcomes and Feasibility of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression for Thoracic Ossification of the Ligamentum Flavum: A Retrospective Single-Center Study
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Comparison of clinical outcomes between mobile- and fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial compartment osteoarthritis: a retrospective study
    Hongze Chen, Xiaodong Zheng, Shaobin Zhu +4
    Frontiers in surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  3. Unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression versus standard open bilateral decompression in patients with single-level lumbar spinal stenosis without instability: a single-center retrospective cohort study
    Martin Hampl, Filip Blazek, Daniel Pohlodek +2
    Frontiers in SurgeryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaDOAJ
  4. The application of tubeless anesthesia technique in tracheal tumor resection surgery: a case report
    Jing-Ting Tang, Huilu Li, Bo Wu +2
    Annals of medicine and surgery (2012)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. The initial application of RawVisionTM plaque (RVP) quantitative technique in evaluation for carotid plaque vulnerability
    Siqi Cao, Juan Cheng, Xinliang Xu +5
    Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textMedical imaging & radiologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{pan2026clinical,
  title = {{Clinical Application of Suture Distraction Technique for Closure of Decompression Incisions Following Lower-Leg Compartment Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Study}},
  author = {Yuan Pan and Tao Wang and Min An and Yingying Deng and Chao Feng},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/jcm15207971},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/20/7971},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Clinical Application of Suture Distraction Technique for Closure of Decompression Incisions Following Lower-Leg Compartment Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Study
AU  - Yuan Pan
AU  - Tao Wang
AU  - Min An
AU  - Yingying Deng
AU  - Chao Feng
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm15207971
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/20/7971
AB  - Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the suture distraction technique (SDT) for closing decompression wounds resulting from acute compartment syndrome (ACS) of the lower leg, and to examine whether it may serve as an alternative to skin grafting (SG). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 67 patients who received decompressive fasciotomy for lower-leg ACS from January 2018 to June 2025. Of these, 31 were managed with SDT and 36 with SG. Wound healing time served as the primary outcome; secondary outcomes comprised the number of operations, hospital stay, wound-closure-related costs, sensory function, Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) scores, donor-site injury, and infection rate. Results: The two groups were broadly similar in baseline characteristics. Compared with the SG group, the SDT group required fewer operations (median 1.0 vs. 2.0), achieved faster wound healing (14.0 vs. 18.5 days), had shorter hospital stays (27.0 vs. 46.0 days), and incurred lower wound-closure-related costs (1656 vs. 14,926.5 CNY) (all p < 0.001). VSS scores favored the SDT group (0.0 vs. 4.0, p < 0.001). All SDT patients preserved normal sensation, whereas all SG patients experienced hypoesthesia (p < 0.001). As an inherent consequence of skin grafting, every grafted patient had a donor-site wound, whereas no SDT patient required grafting and therefore had none; donor-site morbidity was described descriptively rather than compared statistically. The infection rate did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.495); however, given the small number of events, no firm conclusion could be drawn. In the parsimonious adjusted analysis, the SG group had a significantly longer wound healing time (adjusted ratio, 1.412; 95% CI, 1.303 to 1.531; p < 0.001). The time from injury to fasciotomy was significantly longer in the SG group than in the SDT group (median 5.7 vs. 4.5 h; p = 0.012). Conclusions: Within this single-center retrospective cohort, SDT was linked to fewer operations, shorter wound healing time and hospital stay, and reduced costs, while preserving sensation and avoiding donor-site morbidity. As the decompression incision in ACS involves no actual loss of skin, this wound type may be particularly well suited to SDT, which enabled complete closure without skin grafting in the present cohort. These findings merit confirmation through prospective comparative studies.
SN  - 2077-0383
ER  -