Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,230 studies31 sourcesUpdated 1 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Medical Devices (Auckland, N.Z.)

Beyond Anatomy in Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: Hypoxia, Physiological Reserve, and the Next Generation of Intelligent Endovascular Devices

9 affiliations
  1. 1Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK
  2. 2Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  3. 3Lancaster University Medical School, Faculty of Health & Medicine, Lancaster University, Sir John Fisher Drive, Lancaster, UK
  4. 4Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  5. 5Institute of Cardiac and Aortic Disorders (ICAD), SRM Institutes for Medical Science (SIMS Hospital), Chennai, India
  6. 6Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Royal Blackburn Teaching Hospital, Blackburn, UK
  7. 7Department of Medicine and Surgery, Varese University Hospital, University of Insubria School of Medicine, Varese, Italy
  8. 8University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
  9. 9Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK

Abstract

Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) represents a heterogeneous disease process that cannot be fully understood through anatomy alone. Although the majority of patients initially meet current criteria for uncomplicated TBAD (uTBAD), a substantial proportion later progresses despite appearing stable during early assessment and surveillance. The mechanisms underlying this deterioration remain incompletely understood and extends beyond our current understanding of traditional anatomic high-risk criteria. This article examines impaired oxygenation and physiological reserve as potential dimensions of clinical vulnerability in uTBAD, while distinguishing their possible relevance to acute deterioration from their unproven value in predicting aortic progression or selecting patients for intervention. As such, TBAD is not simply a focal vascular event, but a disease with broader systemic and physiological implications. It also discusses how future intelligent endovascular technologies could support a more personalised approach to management by integrating embedded sensors, wireless physiological monitoring, and artificial intelligence-assisted haemodynamic analysis. Moreover, a conceptual framework is discussed in which the stent graft evolves from a purely mechanical device into an active therapeutic platform capable of physiological sensing and real-time feedback.

Related

  1. Perspectives on Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: An International Survey Within the SUNDAY Network
    Bianca Biersteker, Felix Hers, Meike Langenhuijzen +10
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCCrossref
  2. Digital Twin-Based Risk Stratification Integrating Aortic Shape and Wall Mechanics in Acute Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection
    M. Liu, Z. Zhou, Y. Du +6
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textCardiovascular medicinemedRxiv
  3. Hybrid approach with thoracic endovascular treatment and abdominal aortic replacement for acute type B aortic dissection complicated by ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm
    Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniquesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  4. Early-term and midterm outcomes of endovascular completion of high-risk subacute and early chronic residual dissection after type A repair
    Marco Ferraresi, Maria Katsarou, Alessandro Carlo Luigi Molinari +5
    JTCVS structural and endovascularPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Endovascular Management With a Fenestration Technique of an Iatrogenic Thoracic Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection
    Harold Mesquita da Cunha, Simon Landsweerdt, Julien Possoz +1
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{bashir2026beyond,
  title = {{Beyond Anatomy in Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: Hypoxia, Physiological Reserve, and the Next Generation of Intelligent Endovascular Devices}},
  author = {Mohamad Bashir and Matti Jubouri and Christopher J Gaffney and Nimrat Grewal and Idhrees Mohammed and Amr Abdelhaliem and Gabriele Piffaretti and Martin Teraa and Damian M Bailey and Ian M Williams},
  journal = {Medical Devices (Auckland, N.Z.)},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.2147/mder.s636743},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.2147/mder.s636743},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Beyond Anatomy in Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: Hypoxia, Physiological Reserve, and the Next Generation of Intelligent Endovascular Devices
AU  - Mohamad Bashir
AU  - Matti Jubouri
AU  - Christopher J Gaffney
AU  - Nimrat Grewal
AU  - Idhrees Mohammed
AU  - Amr Abdelhaliem
AU  - Gabriele Piffaretti
AU  - Martin Teraa
AU  - Damian M Bailey
AU  - Ian M Williams
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
JO  - Medical Devices (Auckland, N.Z.)
DO  - 10.2147/mder.s636743
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2147/mder.s636743
AB  - Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) represents a heterogeneous disease process that cannot be fully understood through anatomy alone. Although the majority of patients initially meet current criteria for uncomplicated TBAD (uTBAD), a substantial proportion later progresses despite appearing stable during early assessment and surveillance. The mechanisms underlying this deterioration remain incompletely understood and extends beyond our current understanding of traditional anatomic high-risk criteria. This article examines impaired oxygenation and physiological reserve as potential dimensions of clinical vulnerability in uTBAD, while distinguishing their possible relevance to acute deterioration from their unproven value in predicting aortic progression or selecting patients for intervention. As such, TBAD is not simply a focal vascular event, but a disease with broader systemic and physiological implications. It also discusses how future intelligent endovascular technologies could support a more personalised approach to management by integrating embedded sensors, wireless physiological monitoring, and artificial intelligence-assisted haemodynamic analysis. Moreover, a conceptual framework is discussed in which the stent graft evolves from a purely mechanical device into an active therapeutic platform capable of physiological sensing and real-time feedback.
SN  - 1179-1470
ER  -