Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,549 studies31 sourcesUpdated 31 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYMicroplastics

Microplastic and Nanoplastic Pollution in Zooplankton: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Ingestion, Ecotoxicological Effects, and Research Gaps

  1. 1Ecology and Marine Biology Department, National Institute for Marine Research and Development “Grigore Antipa”, 300 Mamaia Blvd., 900581 Constanta, Romania

Abstract

Microplastic pollution is a pervasive and ecologically significant threat to aquatic systems. Zooplankton, as key mediators of energy transfer and carbon cycling, are particularly vulnerable to microplastic ingestion due to size overlap with natural prey. This systematic literature review synthesises 250 peer-reviewed studies on zooplankton–microplastic and nanoplastic interactions, identified through a Web of Science search (403 initial records, 2012–2026) and screened using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria. Bibliometric and narrative thematic analyses were conducted to evaluate publication trends, taxonomic coverage, biological endpoints, experimental design, particle characteristics, and geographic distribution. Publication output increased rapidly after 2019, with nanoplastics emerging as a major research focus. The literature is strongly biassed toward model organisms such as Daphnia magna and Artemia salina, with limited representation of marine taxa. Ingestion and oxidative stress are the most studied endpoints, while trophic transfer, carbon flux, and multi-stressor interactions remain underexplored. Reported experimental designs are predominantly laboratory-based and frequently employ supra-environmental concentrations and simplified particle types. A major geographic gap is identified for the Black Sea, with minimal coverage and no data for dominant regional species. Future research should prioritise ecologically realistic conditions, broader taxonomic and geographic representation, and integrated multi-stressor approaches to support ecosystem-based management. This review characterises publication patterns and knowledge gaps; it does not constitute a formal evidence synthesis, and frequency distributions reflect research coverage rather than strength of evidence.

Related

  1. Synergistic effects of biochar and vegetation on microplastic and nanoplastic removal from stormwater runoff in bioretention systems
    Wenxi Liao, Georgina C. Kalogerakis, Ana C. Quevedo +4
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionChemRxiv
  2. Toxicants Released from Cigarette Butt and Other Tobacco and Nicotine Product Waste and Their Ecotoxicological Impact: A Systematic Review with One Health Perspectives.
    Andrea Moscato, Paola Rapisarda, Margherita Ferrante +6
    ToxicsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionEurope PMC
  3. Microplastic Pollution and Coastal Anthropogenic Pressure in the Caspian Sea Basin Through Systematic Review and Secondary Data Analysis
    Ulvi Mammadov, Tamara Namazova, Narmin Ahmadova
    American Journal of Energy and Natural ResourcesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text10 citedEnvironmental science & pollutionOpenAlex
  4. Towards a circular business ecosystem 4.0 in the cosmetics industry: Findings from a bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review
    André Nana, Ransome Bawack, Gwenola Yannou-Le Bris +1
    Journal of Cleaner ProductionPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull text7 citedEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  5. Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Hydrology and Water Resources: A Systematic Bibliometric Analysis
    George Kwame Frimpong, Omer Mermer, Ibrahim Demir
    EarthArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHydrology & soilsEarthArXiv
BibTeX
@article{bișinicu2026microplastic,
  title = {{Microplastic and Nanoplastic Pollution in Zooplankton: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Ingestion, Ecotoxicological Effects, and Research Gaps}},
  author = {Elena Bișinicu},
  journal = {Microplastics},
  year = {2026},
  month = jun,
  doi = {10.3390/microplastics5020105},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/microplastics5020105},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Microplastic and Nanoplastic Pollution in Zooplankton: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Ingestion, Ecotoxicological Effects, and Research Gaps
AU  - Elena Bișinicu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/06/04
JO  - Microplastics
DO  - 10.3390/microplastics5020105
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3390/microplastics5020105
AB  - Microplastic pollution is a pervasive and ecologically significant threat to aquatic systems. Zooplankton, as key mediators of energy transfer and carbon cycling, are particularly vulnerable to microplastic ingestion due to size overlap with natural prey. This systematic literature review synthesises 250 peer-reviewed studies on zooplankton–microplastic and nanoplastic interactions, identified through a Web of Science search (403 initial records, 2012–2026) and screened using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria. Bibliometric and narrative thematic analyses were conducted to evaluate publication trends, taxonomic coverage, biological endpoints, experimental design, particle characteristics, and geographic distribution. Publication output increased rapidly after 2019, with nanoplastics emerging as a major research focus. The literature is strongly biassed toward model organisms such as Daphnia magna and Artemia salina, with limited representation of marine taxa. Ingestion and oxidative stress are the most studied endpoints, while trophic transfer, carbon flux, and multi-stressor interactions remain underexplored. Reported experimental designs are predominantly laboratory-based and frequently employ supra-environmental concentrations and simplified particle types. A major geographic gap is identified for the Black Sea, with minimal coverage and no data for dominant regional species. Future research should prioritise ecologically realistic conditions, broader taxonomic and geographic representation, and integrated multi-stressor approaches to support ecosystem-based management. This review characterises publication patterns and knowledge gaps; it does not constitute a formal evidence synthesis, and frequency distributions reflect research coverage rather than strength of evidence.
SN  - 2673-8929
ER  -