Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,226 studies31 sourcesUpdated 22 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYPLOS Global Public Health

Creating order in the uncertainty of childbirth: A qualitative study of obstetric admission and triage practices in rural Malawi

  1. 1Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  2. 2Centre for Reproductive Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.

Abstract

Maternal and neonatal mortality continues to be a concern in sub-Saharan Africa. Although standardized obstetric triage improves clinical outcomes, little is known about how locally developed admission practices function in low-resource settings where national obstetric triage guidelines are absent. This study explored how hospital-based obstetric admission procedures in rural Malawi were experienced by maternity care providers, laboring women, and companions. We used qualitative methods including in-depth interviews with mothers and maternity care providers, focus group discussions with companions and maternity care providers, and observations of two labor wards. Study participants were chosen purposively to represent diverse birth outcomes and professionals. Data analysis followed reflexive thematic analysis, concentrating on obstetric admissions. Mary Douglas’ concepts of purity, danger, and risk informed interpretation during theme development. Obstetric admissions were organized through standardized admission forms that structured assessment and enabled providers to classify women according to visible danger signs and labor progression. Although the forms were not formal triage tools, they functioned as the primary mechanism for prioritizing care, organizing patient movement through maternity spaces, and managing high patient volumes. Shared recognition of danger signs among providers, women, and companions reinforced the legitimacy of risk-based decision making. At the same time, communication was selectively restricted, limiting patient and companion participation while reinforcing professional authority and hierarchical relationships. Standardized admission procedures created order by classifying obstetric risk and prioritizing clinical efficiency, but they also reinforced hierarchical relationships that limited communication and patient participation. Efforts to strengthen obstetric admissions should preserve the benefits of standardized risk assessment while incorporating more person-centered communication and companion engagement.

Related

  1. Mishel’s Theory of Uncertainty in Illness in Support of Clinical Reasoning and Nursing Care Practices
    Cécile Bartholome, Pascale Beloni, Jean Toniolo +1
    Recherche et Avancées en Sciences InfirmièresPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHAL
  2. Antibiotic prescribing practices of community health extension workers in East Central Uganda: an exploratory qualitative study
    Enid Kawala Kagoya, Christopher Aturinda, Richard Gamubaka +4
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textMicrobiologyCrossref
  3. Monitoring childbirth and immediate postpartum care quality: A scoping review of indicators in high-income countries
    M. Allison Warren, Dayana Hamparsoumian, Elsa Lorthe +17
    PLoS ONEPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biologyObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsHALPLOS
  4. N6-methyladenosine epitranscriptomic alterations and their potential implications for maternal–fetal immune tolerance in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome
    Miguel A. Vázquez-Toledo, Carlos A. Guzman-Martin, Fausto Sánchez-Muñoz +2
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0ImmunologyCrossref
  5. Evaluation of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 scoring tool up to 30 days postpartum: a secondary cross-sectional psychometric analysis (SOCRATES cohort)
    Emilienne Celetta, Elsa Lorthe, Gilles Cattani +8
    International Journal of Obstetric AnesthesiaPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biologyObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsHAL
BibTeX
@article{bundy2026creating,
  title = {{Creating order in the uncertainty of childbirth: A qualitative study of obstetric admission and triage practices in rural Malawi}},
  author = {Emily Bundy and Bianca Kandeya and Wanangwa Chimwaza and Claudia Hanson and Effie Chipeta and Helle Mölsted Alvesson},
  journal = {PLOS Global Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pgph.0006312},
  url = {https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006312},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Creating order in the uncertainty of childbirth: A qualitative study of obstetric admission and triage practices in rural Malawi
AU  - Emily Bundy
AU  - Bianca Kandeya
AU  - Wanangwa Chimwaza
AU  - Claudia Hanson
AU  - Effie Chipeta
AU  - Helle Mölsted Alvesson
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
JO  - PLOS Global Public Health
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pgph.0006312
UR  - https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006312
AB  - Maternal and neonatal mortality continues to be a concern in sub-Saharan Africa. Although standardized obstetric triage improves clinical outcomes, little is known about how locally developed admission practices function in low-resource settings where national obstetric triage guidelines are absent. This study explored how hospital-based obstetric admission procedures in rural Malawi were experienced by maternity care providers, laboring women, and companions. We used qualitative methods including in-depth interviews with mothers and maternity care providers, focus group discussions with companions and maternity care providers, and observations of two labor wards. Study participants were chosen purposively to represent diverse birth outcomes and professionals. Data analysis followed reflexive thematic analysis, concentrating on obstetric admissions. Mary Douglas’ concepts of purity, danger, and risk informed interpretation during theme development. Obstetric admissions were organized through standardized admission forms that structured assessment and enabled providers to classify women according to visible danger signs and labor progression. Although the forms were not formal triage tools, they functioned as the primary mechanism for prioritizing care, organizing patient movement through maternity spaces, and managing high patient volumes. Shared recognition of danger signs among providers, women, and companions reinforced the legitimacy of risk-based decision making. At the same time, communication was selectively restricted, limiting patient and companion participation while reinforcing professional authority and hierarchical relationships. Standardized admission procedures created order by classifying obstetric risk and prioritizing clinical efficiency, but they also reinforced hierarchical relationships that limited communication and patient participation. Efforts to strengthen obstetric admissions should preserve the benefits of standardized risk assessment while incorporating more person-centered communication and companion engagement.
SN  - 2767-3375
ER  -