Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 20 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Scientific Reports

Psychometric validation of the perceived digital well-being scale and digital well-being questionnaire among adolescents receiving psychiatric care

Abstract

Research on adolescents’ digital media use has largely focused on risks and negative mental health outcomes, while comparatively little attention has been paid to digital well-being, defined as individuals’ subjective experience of the benefits and drawbacks of digital engagement. Empirical validation of digital well-being measures remains scarce, particularly among adolescents receiving psychiatric care and in non-Western contexts. This study aimed (a) to examine the construct validity, internal reliability, and gender invariance of the Perceived Digital Well-being Scale (PDWS) and the Digital Well-being Questionnaire (DWBQ) in a clinical adolescent sample, and (b) to assess their convergent validity, including associations with problematic social media use. A total of 481 Turkish adolescents (aged 14–18 years) receiving psychiatric care completed self-report measures of digital well-being (PDWS, DWBQ), problematic social media use (Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale), anxiety and depression (PHQ-4), and life satisfaction (KIDSCREEN-10). Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to test factorial structure and gender invariance. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega and other indicators; convergent validity was examined via correlation analyses. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the proposed multidimensional structures of both the PDWS and the DWBQ, with good/excellent model fit indices. All dimensions demonstrated satisfactory internal reliability. Gender invariance analyses indicated stable factor structures across male and female participants. Mean digital well-being scores were above the scale mid-points, despite participants’ clinical status. PDWS and DWBQ dimensions were positively intercorrelated and most dimensions were significantly and negatively associated with problematic social media use, supporting convergent validity. The findings demonstrate that digital well-being can be reliably and validly assessed among adolescents receiving psychiatric care. Results challenge deficit-oriented assumptions about clinical adolescents’ digital lives and support a more nuanced understanding of digital engagement that integrates both risks and resources.

Related

  1. Psychometric Evaluation of the Importance of Olfaction Questionnaire Using Item Response Theory
    Alexander Lein, Bernhard Prem, Christian A. Mueller +1
    International Forum of Allergy & RhinologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textNeurosciencePMC
  2. Psychometric assessment of the Persian version of the DUSAETCS questionnaire: Duke University Self-Assessment Educational Technology Competencies
    Haniyeh Rezaie, Aeen Mohammadi, Rita Mojtahedzadeh +2
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NeuroscienceStatisticsPLOS
  3. Development and psychometric properties of a questionnaire to evaluate the professional behavior of medical residents
    Shahsanam Gheibi, Mohammad Heidari, Alireza Alemi +4
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceStatisticsPLOS
  4. Development and psychometric properties of the Ageism Questionnaire for Nurses (AQN).
    Mingtu Xu, Bo Wu, Cong Fu +5
    BMC nursingPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMCPMC
  5. Exploring psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) among adolescent Palestinian refugee girls in Palestine and Jordan
    Mohammed B. A. Sarhan, Rula Ghandour, Weeam Hammoudeh
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceEpidemiology & public healthPLOS
BibTeX
@article{cruz2026psychometric,
  title = {{Psychometric validation of the perceived digital well-being scale and digital well-being questionnaire among adolescents receiving psychiatric care}},
  author = {Germano Vera Cruz and Merve Aktaş Terzioğlu and Clarice Da Rosa and Riaz Khan and Yasser Khazaal},
  journal = {Scientific Reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-70991-8},
  url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-70991-8},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Psychometric validation of the perceived digital well-being scale and digital well-being questionnaire among adolescents receiving psychiatric care
AU  - Germano Vera Cruz
AU  - Merve Aktaş Terzioğlu
AU  - Clarice Da Rosa
AU  - Riaz Khan
AU  - Yasser Khazaal
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/16
JO  - Scientific Reports
DO  - 10.1038/s41598-026-70991-8
UR  - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-70991-8
AB  - Research on adolescents’ digital media use has largely focused on risks and negative mental health outcomes, while comparatively little attention has been paid to digital well-being, defined as individuals’ subjective experience of the benefits and drawbacks of digital engagement. Empirical validation of digital well-being measures remains scarce, particularly among adolescents receiving psychiatric care and in non-Western contexts. This study aimed (a) to examine the construct validity, internal reliability, and gender invariance of the Perceived Digital Well-being Scale (PDWS) and the Digital Well-being Questionnaire (DWBQ) in a clinical adolescent sample, and (b) to assess their convergent validity, including associations with problematic social media use. A total of 481 Turkish adolescents (aged 14–18 years) receiving psychiatric care completed self-report measures of digital well-being (PDWS, DWBQ), problematic social media use (Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale), anxiety and depression (PHQ-4), and life satisfaction (KIDSCREEN-10). Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to test factorial structure and gender invariance. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega and other indicators; convergent validity was examined via correlation analyses. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the proposed multidimensional structures of both the PDWS and the DWBQ, with good/excellent model fit indices. All dimensions demonstrated satisfactory internal reliability. Gender invariance analyses indicated stable factor structures across male and female participants. Mean digital well-being scores were above the scale mid-points, despite participants’ clinical status. PDWS and DWBQ dimensions were positively intercorrelated and most dimensions were significantly and negatively associated with problematic social media use, supporting convergent validity. The findings demonstrate that digital well-being can be reliably and validly assessed among adolescents receiving psychiatric care. Results challenge deficit-oriented assumptions about clinical adolescents’ digital lives and support a more nuanced understanding of digital engagement that integrates both risks and resources.
SN  - 2045-2322
ER  -