Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,125 studies31 sourcesUpdated 42 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

No Free Compression in Quantum Relaxations for Optimization

Abstract

Qubit-efficient quantum relaxations compress classical decision variables into expectation values on substantially fewer qubits. We ask what resource tradeoffs this compression entails for quantum optimization. For the complete quadratic-Majorana encoding of m=Θ(n2) binary variables on~n qubits, we define the universal margin as the smallest correlator magnitude that can be guaranteed with prescribed signs for every target sign (bit) assignment. We show that it is exactly ΔMaj(n)=tan (π/4n)=Θ(1/n), whereas uniformly random sign assignments retain Θ(1/√n) target-specific margins. Arbitrary density operators and mixed fermionic Gaussian states generate the same quadratic-Majorana covariance body, so non-Gaussian state resources cannot enlarge this two-point relaxation. More generally, standard quantum random access code bounds provide general information-theoretic baselines. For any fixed family of m designated binary observables on~n qubits, the universal margin is at most √((2ln2 n/m)), and random access decoding from N copies with constant success probability above 1/2 requires nN=Ω(m). For a fixed Pauli correlation encoding required to work uniformly over all targets, maintaining a fixed nonzero decoded magnitude under smooth sign decoding therefore requires a rescaling parameter that grows as the available margin shrinks. Thus, while providing substantial qubit savings, compression can shift cost into restricted expectation value geometry, smaller expectation value magnitudes, or more demanding information recovery rather than eliminate it.

Related

  1. Complexity Amplification from Compression in Quantum Random Access Optimization
    Stuart Hadfield
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. Efficient SPAD reconstruction framework with time-frequency domain compression and lightweight joint depth-intensity optimization
    Yaoqi Bao, Sijie Wu, Dong Li +4
    Optics ExpressPeer-reviewedPublisher termsApplied physics & instrumentationCrossref
  3. Optimal compression with quantum retrieval
    Shyam Dhamapurkar, Mohit Garg, Manaswi Paraashar +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Quantum Simulation of Non-Markovian Open Quantum Systems via Low-Rank Kernel Compression and Coupling Dilution
    Hengzhun Chen, Zhenning Cai
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. Image Compression Using Quantum Wavelet Transform and Quantum Convolutional Networks
    Harshdeep Jadhav, Sreeraj Rajan Warrier, Jayasri Dontabhaktuni
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{hadfield2026free,
  title = {{No Free Compression in Quantum Relaxations for Optimization}},
  author = {Stuart Hadfield},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.25151},
  eprint = {2608.25151},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.25151},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - No Free Compression in Quantum Relaxations for Optimization
AU  - Stuart Hadfield
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/02
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.25151
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.25151
AB  - Qubit-efficient quantum relaxations compress classical decision variables into expectation values on substantially fewer qubits. We ask what resource tradeoffs this compression entails for quantum optimization. For the complete quadratic-Majorana encoding of m=Θ(n^2) binary variables on~n qubits, we define the universal margin as the smallest correlator magnitude that can be guaranteed with prescribed signs for every target sign (bit) assignment. We show that it is exactly Δ_Maj(n)=tan (π/4n)=Θ(1/n), whereas uniformly random sign assignments retain Θ(1/√n) target-specific margins. Arbitrary density operators and mixed fermionic Gaussian states generate the same quadratic-Majorana covariance body, so non-Gaussian state resources cannot enlarge this two-point relaxation. More generally, standard quantum random access code bounds provide general information-theoretic baselines. For any fixed family of m designated binary observables on~n qubits, the universal margin is at most √((2ln2 n/m)), and random access decoding from N copies with constant success probability above 1/2 requires nN=Ω(m). For a fixed Pauli correlation encoding required to work uniformly over all targets, maintaining a fixed nonzero decoded magnitude under smooth sign decoding therefore requires a rescaling parameter that grows as the available margin shrinks. Thus, while providing substantial qubit savings, compression can shift cost into restricted expectation value geometry, smaller expectation value magnitudes, or more demanding information recovery rather than eliminate it.
ER  -