Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,783 studies31 sourcesUpdated 39 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Domain Adaptation with Target Information via Doubly-Anchored Distributionally Robust Optimization

Abstract

Domain Adaptation (DA) often lacks worst-case guarantees, while Distributionally Robust Optimization (DRO) based only on source data centers its ambiguity set at the source law and ignores available target structure. To bridge this gap, we introduce a doubly-anchored DRO framework whose ambiguity set is the intersection of ϕ-divergence balls centered at the source law and a source-completed target reference law, the latter pairing the target covariate law with the source conditional law. We derive dual-induced adversarial bridge geometries for symmetric and asymmetric divergence pairings, notably introducing a Kullback--Leibler/squared-Hellinger (KL/HD) bridge. This asymmetric formulation yields a Lambert-W geometry in which source-side exponential risk tilting and target-side Hellinger stabilization enter through distinct terms, attenuating, but not bounding, the effect of large likelihood ratios. Furthermore, without imposing covariate shift, we establish finite-sample generalization bounds for the minimizer of a structural, loss-agnostic density-bridge risk under bounded-overlap conditions; these bounds do not apply directly to the loss-aware DRO min--max estimator. We translate our framework into a bridge-weighted Nadaraya--Watson estimator, proving uniform consistency for the source regression function and pointwise asymptotic normality, with target recovery when the source and target regression functions coincide, as under covariate shift. Finally, an empirical evaluation on a domain-shifted Fashion-MNIST dataset illustrates the finite-sample stability of the asymmetric KL/HD bridge under severe synthetic target-covariate corruption.

Related

  1. Data-driven joint optimization of maintenance and spare parts provisioning: A distributionally robust approach
    Weijun Xie, Nagi Gebraeel, Stephen Robinson +1
    European Journal of Operational ResearchPeer-reviewedLicence not stated2 citedOptimisation & controlHAL
  2. Conformal-DRO: Distributionally Robust Optimization with Conformalized Ambiguity Set
    Luhao Zhang, Shixiang Zhu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlStatisticsarXiv
  3. On tractability, complexity, and mixed-integer convex programming representability of distributionally favorable optimization
    Nan Jiang, Weijun Xie
    Mathematical ProgrammingPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text1 citedOptimisation & controlHAL
  4. Calibrating Ambiguity Set via Diagnostic Transport for Distributionally Robust Optimization
    Wenbin Zhou, Elizabeth Cucuzzella, Shixiang Zhu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlStatisticsarXiv
  5. Higher-Order Sensitivity Analysis of Wasserstein and Adapted Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimization Problems
    Nathan Sauldubois
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{kepplinger2026domain,
  title = {{Domain Adaptation with Target Information via Doubly-Anchored Distributionally Robust Optimization}},
  author = {David Kepplinger and Anand N. Vidyashankar},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.32730},
  eprint = {2609.32730},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.32730},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Domain Adaptation with Target Information via Doubly-Anchored Distributionally Robust Optimization
AU  - David Kepplinger
AU  - Anand N. Vidyashankar
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/26
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.32730
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.32730
AB  - Domain Adaptation (DA) often lacks worst-case guarantees, while Distributionally Robust Optimization (DRO) based only on source data centers its ambiguity set at the source law and ignores available target structure. To bridge this gap, we introduce a doubly-anchored DRO framework whose ambiguity set is the intersection of ϕ-divergence balls centered at the source law and a source-completed target reference law, the latter pairing the target covariate law with the source conditional law. We derive dual-induced adversarial bridge geometries for symmetric and asymmetric divergence pairings, notably introducing a Kullback--Leibler/squared-Hellinger (KL/HD) bridge. This asymmetric formulation yields a Lambert-W geometry in which source-side exponential risk tilting and target-side Hellinger stabilization enter through distinct terms, attenuating, but not bounding, the effect of large likelihood ratios. Furthermore, without imposing covariate shift, we establish finite-sample generalization bounds for the minimizer of a structural, loss-agnostic density-bridge risk under bounded-overlap conditions; these bounds do not apply directly to the loss-aware DRO min--max estimator. We translate our framework into a bridge-weighted Nadaraya--Watson estimator, proving uniform consistency for the source regression function and pointwise asymptotic normality, with target recovery when the source and target regression functions coincide, as under covariate shift. Finally, an empirical evaluation on a domain-shifted Fashion-MNIST dataset illustrates the finite-sample stability of the asymmetric KL/HD bridge under severe synthetic target-covariate corruption.
ER  -