Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,860 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0PsyArXiv

Spirituality Matters in Deconstructive Meditation: Comparing Secular and Buddhist-Based Mechanisms of Change in Depressive Vulnerability

Abstract

This exploratory study extends a previously implemented randomized protocol to examine whether incorporating Buddhist-based spiritual and philosophical components into deconstructive meditation is associated with different patterns of psychological change. We compared secular deconstructive meditation (S-SI; n = 49), Buddhist-based deconstructive meditation (B-SI; n = 53), and a waitlist control condition (WL; n = 50) on depression-related outcomes (dysfunctional attitudes, identity threat, and depressive symptoms) and selflessness-related processes (connectedness to humanity, connectedness to nature, and cognitive decentering). Participants completed pre- and post-intervention assessments, and changes across conditions were examined using repeated-measures MANOVA. Within-subject mediation analyses further explored whether changes in selflessness-related processes were associated with changes in depression-related outcomes. Both active conditions showed greater reductions in depressive symptoms than the waitlist condition. Compared with S-SI, B-SI showed greater reductions in dysfunctional attitudes and identity threat, as well as larger increases in connectedness to humanity, connectedness to nature, and cognitive decentering. Within B-SI, changes in cognitive decentering and connectedness to nature showed significant indirect effects on changes in dysfunctional attitudes, whereas changes in connectedness to humanity showed significant indirect effects on changes in identity threat in both active conditions. None of the examined processes showed significant indirect effects on changes in depressive symptoms in either active condition. These findings suggest that the Buddhist-based condition may engage a broader range of self-related processes associated with depressive vulnerability. Given the exploratory, nonconcurrent design, these findings require confirmation in prospectively randomized comparisons.

Related

  1. The Formation of the Sufferer: Deconstructive Inquiry and the Self-Problem Relation in Psychotherapy
    Arie T. Greenleaf
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  2. Shared and disorder-specific computational mechanisms of interference and response inhibition in schizophrenia and major depressive disorder
    Tongyi Zhang, Sirui Wang, Haoyang Shi +5
    Translational PsychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthPMCDOAJ
  3. Psychedelics, spirituality and drug policy: Harm reduction without compulsory medicalisation
    Baptiste Fauvel
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  4. Mindfulness meditation does not make people more present-biased
    Josep Gisbert, Daniel Navarro-Martinez, Andrés Martín-Asuero +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthCrossref
  5. Effectiveness of Yoga-based guided meditation In Improving the quality of sleep in patients with coronary artery disease: The Yoga Nidra Trial
    Gautam Sharma, Praveen Murugesan, Anupama Gupta +13
    American journal of preventive cardiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{stinus2026spirituality,
  title = {{Spirituality Matters in Deconstructive Meditation: Comparing Secular and Buddhist-Based Mechanisms of Change in Depressive Vulnerability}},
  author = {Céline Stinus and Sophie Berjot},
  howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.31234/osf.io/raf7c_v1},
  url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/raf7c_v1/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Spirituality Matters in Deconstructive Meditation: Comparing Secular and Buddhist-Based Mechanisms of Change in Depressive Vulnerability
AU  - Céline Stinus
AU  - Sophie Berjot
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/02
PB  - PsyArXiv
DO  - 10.31234/osf.io/raf7c_v1
UR  - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/raf7c_v1/
AB  - This exploratory study extends a previously implemented randomized protocol to examine whether incorporating Buddhist-based spiritual and philosophical components into deconstructive meditation is associated with different patterns of psychological change. We compared secular deconstructive meditation (S-SI; n = 49), Buddhist-based deconstructive meditation (B-SI; n = 53), and a waitlist control condition (WL; n = 50) on depression-related outcomes (dysfunctional attitudes, identity threat, and depressive symptoms) and selflessness-related processes (connectedness to humanity, connectedness to nature, and cognitive decentering). Participants completed pre- and post-intervention assessments, and changes across conditions were examined using repeated-measures MANOVA. Within-subject mediation analyses further explored whether changes in selflessness-related processes were associated with changes in depression-related outcomes. Both active conditions showed greater reductions in depressive symptoms than the waitlist condition. Compared with S-SI, B-SI showed greater reductions in dysfunctional attitudes and identity threat, as well as larger increases in connectedness to humanity, connectedness to nature, and cognitive decentering. Within B-SI, changes in cognitive decentering and connectedness to nature showed significant indirect effects on changes in dysfunctional attitudes, whereas changes in connectedness to humanity showed significant indirect effects on changes in identity threat in both active conditions. None of the examined processes showed significant indirect effects on changes in depressive symptoms in either active condition. These findings suggest that the Buddhist-based condition may engage a broader range of self-related processes associated with depressive vulnerability. Given the exploratory, nonconcurrent design, these findings require confirmation in prospectively randomized comparisons.
ER  -