Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,713 studies31 sourcesUpdated just now
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0JAMA Network Open

LGBTQ+ Disparities in Food Insecurity, Food Assistance Use, and Barriers to Food Assistance

6 affiliations
  1. 1Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  2. 2Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
  3. 3Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts
  4. 4The Greater Boston Food Bank, Boston, Massachusetts
  5. 5Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
  6. 6Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts

Abstract

Importance: Food insecurity disproportionately affects lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) adults, yet population-based data on disparities in food assistance use and barriers to accessing services remain limited.

Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of food insecurity and food assistance program use among LGBTQ+ adults in Massachusetts from 2022 to 2024 and identify LGBTQ+-specific barriers to assistance.

Design, Setting, and Participants: This repeated cross-sectional analysis used 2022 to 2024 data from the Massachusetts Statewide Food Access Survey, an annual online survey conducted by the Greater Boston Food Bank and Mass General Brigham.

Exposure: LGBTQ+ identity, defined using a 2-step measure of sexual orientation and gender.

Main Outcomes and Measures: Food insecurity, measured using the 10-item US Department of Agriculture Food Security Survey Module; food pantry and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) use; and barriers to food assistance access. Weighted prevalence estimates and adjusted prevalence ratios with 95% CIs were calculated by LGBTQ+ status.

Results: The sample included 9174 Massachusetts adults (10.4%-12.8% LGBTQ+ across survey years). The prevalence of food insecurity increased significantly from 2022 to 2024 among both non-LGBTQ+ adults (29.8% [95% CI, 27.7%-32.0%] to 33.3% [95% CI, 31.3%-35.3%]) and LGBTQ+ adults (43.7% [95% CI, 37.7%-49.9%] to 54.9% [95% CI, 48.5%-61.1%]). Food pantry and SNAP use among LGBTQ+ adults remained stable over time. Among LGBTQ+ nonusers of food pantries in 2024, the most common barriers to use were wanting to be self-reliant (49.4% [95% CI, 41.6%-57.4%]), embarrassment (37.4% [95% CI, 30.1%-45.2%]), and fear of being identified as a pantry user (35.6% [95% CI, 28.6%-43.3%]); all barriers increased over time and were more commonly reported than among non-LGBTQ+ adults. Common barriers to SNAP use among LGBTQ+ adults in 2024 included wanting to be self-reliant (52.7% [95% CI, 43.4%-61.8%]), concern about taking benefits from someone with more need (44.6% [95% CI, 35.8%-53.7%]), and not knowing how to apply (26.0% [95% CI, 18.5%-35.1%]). In 2024, LGBTQ+ adults frequently endorsed grocery gift cards (42.5% [95% CI, 36.6%-48.7%]), home delivery (42.4% [95% CI, 36.4%-48.6%]), and online ordering (34.0% [95% CI, 28.5%-39.9%]) as strategies to increase pantry use.

Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of food insecurity in Massachusetts, over half of LGBTQ+ adults experienced food insecurity in 2024, alongside barriers to food assistance use. Findings highlight the need for multilevel, community–co-created interventions to reduce disparities among LGBTQ+ individuals in food insecurity and improve equitable access to food assistance.

Related

  1. Disparities in financial hardship between LGBTQ+ and non-LGBTQ+ dyads facing dementia.
    Sara Jackson, Moroni Fernandez Cajavilca, Kara Dassel +6
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMCCrossref
  2. From Charity to Food Social Security: Reframing Food Insecurity in a Segregated Urban Context
    Giorgia Trasciani, Manon Lalliot
    SSRN : Social Science Research NetworkPreprintLicence not statedFull textGeneral biologyNutritionHAL
  3. Food Insecurity in Medical Residents and Fellows
    Julie L. Oyler, Amber Bird
    JAMA Network OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossref
  4. Food Insecurity Among University Students: Evidence from Three Cross-Sectional Surveys, 2020–2024
    Putu Novi Arfirsta Dharmayani, Seema Mihrshahi
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNutritionEurope PMC
  5. Food Insecurity Among Patients with Chronic Pain in an Urban Slum of Delhi: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study
    Shivani Rao, Kinshuk Gupta, Priyanka Aggarwal +3
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNutritionEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{waters2026lgbtq,
  title = {{LGBTQ+ Disparities in Food Insecurity, Food Assistance Use, and Barriers to Food Assistance}},
  author = {Austin R. Waters and Lauren G. Fiechtner and Meghan E. Perkins and Man Luo and Michele F. Schuckel and Catherine D’Amato and Brittany M. Charlton},
  journal = {JAMA Network Open},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.38129},
  url = {https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2854969},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - LGBTQ+ Disparities in Food Insecurity, Food Assistance Use, and Barriers to Food Assistance
AU  - Austin R. Waters
AU  - Lauren G. Fiechtner
AU  - Meghan E. Perkins
AU  - Man Luo
AU  - Michele F. Schuckel
AU  - Catherine D’Amato
AU  - Brittany M. Charlton
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/08
JO  - JAMA Network Open
DO  - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.38129
UR  - https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2854969
AB  - Importance: Food insecurity disproportionately affects lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) adults, yet population-based data on disparities in food assistance use and barriers to accessing services remain limited.  Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of food insecurity and food assistance program use among LGBTQ+ adults in Massachusetts from 2022 to 2024 and identify LGBTQ+-specific barriers to assistance.  Design, Setting, and Participants: This repeated cross-sectional analysis used 2022 to 2024 data from the Massachusetts Statewide Food Access Survey, an annual online survey conducted by the Greater Boston Food Bank and Mass General Brigham.  Exposure: LGBTQ+ identity, defined using a 2-step measure of sexual orientation and gender.  Main Outcomes and Measures: Food insecurity, measured using the 10-item US Department of Agriculture Food Security Survey Module; food pantry and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) use; and barriers to food assistance access. Weighted prevalence estimates and adjusted prevalence ratios with 95% CIs were calculated by LGBTQ+ status.  Results: The sample included 9174 Massachusetts adults (10.4%-12.8% LGBTQ+ across survey years). The prevalence of food insecurity increased significantly from 2022 to 2024 among both non-LGBTQ+ adults (29.8% [95% CI, 27.7%-32.0%] to 33.3% [95% CI, 31.3%-35.3%]) and LGBTQ+ adults (43.7% [95% CI, 37.7%-49.9%] to 54.9% [95% CI, 48.5%-61.1%]). Food pantry and SNAP use among LGBTQ+ adults remained stable over time. Among LGBTQ+ nonusers of food pantries in 2024, the most common barriers to use were wanting to be self-reliant (49.4% [95% CI, 41.6%-57.4%]), embarrassment (37.4% [95% CI, 30.1%-45.2%]), and fear of being identified as a pantry user (35.6% [95% CI, 28.6%-43.3%]); all barriers increased over time and were more commonly reported than among non-LGBTQ+ adults. Common barriers to SNAP use among LGBTQ+ adults in 2024 included wanting to be self-reliant (52.7% [95% CI, 43.4%-61.8%]), concern about taking benefits from someone with more need (44.6% [95% CI, 35.8%-53.7%]), and not knowing how to apply (26.0% [95% CI, 18.5%-35.1%]). In 2024, LGBTQ+ adults frequently endorsed grocery gift cards (42.5% [95% CI, 36.6%-48.7%]), home delivery (42.4% [95% CI, 36.4%-48.6%]), and online ordering (34.0% [95% CI, 28.5%-39.9%]) as strategies to increase pantry use.  Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of food insecurity in Massachusetts, over half of LGBTQ+ adults experienced food insecurity in 2024, alongside barriers to food assistance use. Findings highlight the need for multilevel, community–co-created interventions to reduce disparities among LGBTQ+ individuals in food insecurity and improve equitable access to food assistance.
SN  - 2574-3805
ER  -