Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 14 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in nutrition

Comparative effects of calcium, vitamin D, and combined supplementation on growth and bone mineral density in healthy children and adolescents: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

  1. 1School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine , ,
  2. 2Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine , ,

Abstract

Background: Calcium and vitamin D are central to skeletal development in childhood, yet the relative effects of calcium alone, vitamin D alone, and their combination on somatic growth and bone mineral density (BMD) in healthy children and adolescents remain unclear.

Methods: Eight databases were searched from inception through June 2026 for randomized controlled trials of oral calcium and/or vitamin D supplementation. Random-effects pairwise meta-analyses and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) evaluated monthly height growth, monthly weight gain, and BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total body.

Results: Sixteen RCTs involving approximately 2,100 participants were included. Supplementation did not significantly affect monthly height growth (MD = 0.0441 cm/month, 95% CI [−0.0114, 0.0996]) or monthly weight gain (MD = 0.0075 kg/month, 95% CI [−0.0064, 0.0214]). Small positive differences were observed for lumbar spine BMD (MD = 0.0145 g/cm2, 95% CI [0.0040, 0.0249]), femoral neck BMD (MD = 0.0101 g/cm2, 95% CI [0.0064, 0.0138]), and total body BMD (MD = 0.0110 g/cm2, 95% CI [0.0049, 0.0170]), with substantial heterogeneity for lumbar spine and total body outcomes. Age-subgroup findings were exploratory, and no significant subgroup differences were found by intervention duration. The NMA did not establish consistent superiority of any active regimen.

Conclusion: Calcium and/or vitamin D supplementation did not appreciably accelerate height or weight gain. Small site-specific increases in aBMD were observed, but their clinical significance remains uncertain and they do not establish benefits for bone strength or fracture prevention. Supplementation should primarily address inadequate intake, biochemical deficiency, or other clinical indications rather than routine growth promotion.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420261388414.

Related

  1. Comparative effects of exercise modalities on visceral adipose tissue in children and adolescents with overweight or obesity: a systematic review and three-level meta-analysis
    Chuan Chen, Wei Zhang, Kaihua Liu +2
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossref
  2. Comparative effects of physical education teaching models on motor skill development in school-aged children and adolescents: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Qi Tian, Yaowen Liu, Ziyu Wang +1
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCCrossref
  3. Dietary advice and supplementation for specific populations (pregnant and breastfeeding women, children, adolescents)
    Julie Lemale, Karima Begriche, Caroline Martineau +2
    Cahiers de Nutrition et de DiététiquePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthHAL
  4. The Effects of Combined Caffeine and Sodium Bicarbonate Supplementation on Exercise Performance, Physiological Responses, and Gastrointestinal Tolerability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Xiang Chen, Wenhui Tu, Jun Wang
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNutritionEurope PMC
  5. Comparative policy analysis of national frameworks for the prevention of non-communicable diseases and injuries in children and adolescents
    Alireza Shoghli, Alireza Raeisi, Jafar Jandaghi +5
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
BibTeX
@article{lv2026comparative,
  title = {{Comparative effects of calcium, vitamin D, and combined supplementation on growth and bone mineral density in healthy children and adolescents: a systematic review and network meta-analysis}},
  author = {Guochun Lv and Pan Liu and Jing He and Fei Qu and Yunya Zhou and Shiwei Wang and Hong Xiang and Hao Gou},
  journal = {Frontiers in nutrition},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fnut.2026.1979566},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13719314},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparative effects of calcium, vitamin D, and combined supplementation on growth and bone mineral density in healthy children and adolescents: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
AU  - Guochun Lv
AU  - Pan Liu
AU  - Jing He
AU  - Fei Qu
AU  - Yunya Zhou
AU  - Shiwei Wang
AU  - Hong Xiang
AU  - Hao Gou
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/16
JO  - Frontiers in nutrition
DO  - 10.3389/fnut.2026.1979566
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13719314
AB  - Background: Calcium and vitamin D are central to skeletal development in childhood, yet the relative effects of calcium alone, vitamin D alone, and their combination on somatic growth and bone mineral density (BMD) in healthy children and adolescents remain unclear.  Methods: Eight databases were searched from inception through June 2026 for randomized controlled trials of oral calcium and/or vitamin D supplementation. Random-effects pairwise meta-analyses and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) evaluated monthly height growth, monthly weight gain, and BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total body.  Results: Sixteen RCTs involving approximately 2,100 participants were included. Supplementation did not significantly affect monthly height growth (MD = 0.0441 cm/month, 95% CI [−0.0114, 0.0996]) or monthly weight gain (MD = 0.0075 kg/month, 95% CI [−0.0064, 0.0214]). Small positive differences were observed for lumbar spine BMD (MD = 0.0145 g/cm2, 95% CI [0.0040, 0.0249]), femoral neck BMD (MD = 0.0101 g/cm2, 95% CI [0.0064, 0.0138]), and total body BMD (MD = 0.0110 g/cm2, 95% CI [0.0049, 0.0170]), with substantial heterogeneity for lumbar spine and total body outcomes. Age-subgroup findings were exploratory, and no significant subgroup differences were found by intervention duration. The NMA did not establish consistent superiority of any active regimen.  Conclusion: Calcium and/or vitamin D supplementation did not appreciably accelerate height or weight gain. Small site-specific increases in aBMD were observed, but their clinical significance remains uncertain and they do not establish benefits for bone strength or fracture prevention. Supplementation should primarily address inadequate intake, biochemical deficiency, or other clinical indications rather than routine growth promotion.  Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420261388414.
SN  - 2296-861X
ER  -