Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 24 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Women's Health

Domestic abuse disclosure in perinatal healthcare settings – A qualitative study into the experiences of mothers who had their baby removed at birth

  1. 1Department of Women and Children’s Health, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
  2. 2Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Rosie Hospital, Cambridge, UK
  3. 3Methodologies Division, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King’s College London, London, UK

Abstract

Background: In the UK, numbers of newborn babies entering state care through child protection processes have significantly increased in the last decade. Their mothers often have experienced cumulative and intersecting disadvantages, including childhood abuse and domestic abuse (DA). DA will often be a key factor in child protection decision-making, with a persistent narrative of mothers ‘failing to protect’ their children. Given the profound consequences of DA disclosures and the failure-to-protect discourse that might impact care proceeding outcomes for these mothers, it is important to explore the factors influencing DA disclosure and the complexities that this population faces.

Objectives: To explore the experiences of DA disclosure in perinatal healthcare settings among mothers who had a baby removed at birth; To understand barriers and facilitators that impact DA disclosure in this context.

Design: The MUMS@RISC study was a mixed-methods doctoral research study. This manuscript focuses on the qualitative part of the study, with women who had a baby removed at birth due child protection processes.

Methods: A secondary analysis of narrative interview data from the MUMS@RISC study, using Braun and Clarke’s Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Robust lived experience involvement and trauma-informed approaches were adopted throughout the entire study design.

Results: Interview data from 7 women were included. Three themes were generated, each with sub-themes: 1) Previous adversity leading to current vulnerability; 2) ‘”It’s not that easy” – Navigating, disclosing and leaving an abusive relationship’; and 3) Finding a way out.

Conclusion: Lifelong adversity leading to vulnerability and fear, coupled with system-level barriers, each led to inadequate support and care, impacting DA disclosure among women who have their baby removed at birth and appropriate professional response. Professional understanding about these interconnecting levels of barriers to DA disclosure and the role of coercive control in DA and sensitive routine enquiry about DA is crucial to facilitate opportunities for disclosure.

Related

  1. Factors affecting women's disclosure of domestic abuse and healthcare professionals' preparedness to identify and respond: a systematic literature review.
    Mandu Stephen Ekpenyong, Khatidja Chantler, Gillian Janes
    Frontiers in global women's healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Lived experiences, barriers, and facilitators of voluntary non-suicidal self-injury disclosure among adolescents who have disclosed: a qualitative systematic review protocol
    Xubin He, Xinghong Xu, Hongyan Huang +3
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthCrossref
  3. “The way I am being treated matters more to me than the TB itself”: experiences of stigma in healthcare settings among people with drug-resistant tuberculosis in Lagos, Nigeria: a qualitative study
    Olusola A. Adejumo, Firoza Haffejee, Olusoji Daniel +1
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Infectious diseaseCrossref
  4. Menopause Literacy Gaps Across Individual, Healthcare and Societal Levels: A Qualitative Study of Women's Experiences and Healthcare Providers' Perspectives.
    Najmeh Pourshahrokhi, Jamileh Farokhzadian, Myra S Hunter +2
    Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMC
  5. Sex workers experiences of HIV prevention, healthcare access and mental health in the West Rand District, South Africa: a qualitative study
    Z. Maphauphau, M. B. Randa, M. Hoque
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textInfectious diseasemedRxiv
BibTeX
@article{knotts2026domestic,
  title = {{Domestic abuse disclosure in perinatal healthcare settings – A qualitative study into the experiences of mothers who had their baby removed at birth}},
  author = {Katie Knotts and Abigail Easter and Caroline Bull and Elsa Montgomery and Jane Sandall and Kaat De Backer},
  journal = {Women's Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1177/17455057261481007},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057261481007},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Domestic abuse disclosure in perinatal healthcare settings – A qualitative study into the experiences of mothers who had their baby removed at birth
AU  - Katie Knotts
AU  - Abigail Easter
AU  - Caroline Bull
AU  - Elsa Montgomery
AU  - Jane Sandall
AU  - Kaat De Backer
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Women's Health
DO  - 10.1177/17455057261481007
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057261481007
AB  - Background: In the UK, numbers of newborn babies entering state care through child protection processes have significantly increased in the last decade. Their mothers often have experienced cumulative and intersecting disadvantages, including childhood abuse and domestic abuse (DA). DA will often be a key factor in child protection decision-making, with a persistent narrative of mothers ‘failing to protect’ their children. Given the profound consequences of DA disclosures and the failure-to-protect discourse that might impact care proceeding outcomes for these mothers, it is important to explore the factors influencing DA disclosure and the complexities that this population faces.  Objectives: To explore the experiences of DA disclosure in perinatal healthcare settings among mothers who had a baby removed at birth; To understand barriers and facilitators that impact DA disclosure in this context.  Design: The MUMS@RISC study was a mixed-methods doctoral research study. This manuscript focuses on the qualitative part of the study, with women who had a baby removed at birth due child protection processes.  Methods: A secondary analysis of narrative interview data from the MUMS@RISC study, using Braun and Clarke’s Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Robust lived experience involvement and trauma-informed approaches were adopted throughout the entire study design.  Results: Interview data from 7 women were included. Three themes were generated, each with sub-themes: 1) Previous adversity leading to current vulnerability; 2) ‘”It’s not that easy” – Navigating, disclosing and leaving an abusive relationship’; and 3) Finding a way out.  Conclusion: Lifelong adversity leading to vulnerability and fear, coupled with system-level barriers, each led to inadequate support and care, impacting DA disclosure among women who have their baby removed at birth and appropriate professional response. Professional understanding about these interconnecting levels of barriers to DA disclosure and the role of coercive control in DA and sensitive routine enquiry about DA is crucial to facilitate opportunities for disclosure.
SN  - 1745-5057
SN  - 1745-5065
ER  -