From functional annotation to functional meaning in microbiome research
Abstract
Microbiome research has moved from cataloging community composition to asking what these communities do, but "function" is often used to describe fundamentally different levels of evidence. Functional claims may refer to functional capacity (what is encoded), functional realization (what molecular functions are actively engaged under specific conditions), or functional impact (the resulting consequences for hosts, microbial communities, or ecosystems). In this Perspective, we examine how functional annotations in microbiome research generate biological meaning and why current approaches support different kinds of inference. We propose a framework that distinguishes three levels of functional inference: capacity, realization, and impact. Homology-based, domain-centric, pathway-based, machine learning-driven, and multi-omics approaches each contribute differently to these levels, but none alone captures microbiome function in full. We argue that microbiome function should be interpreted as a hierarchy of inferences rather than a single property. Recognizing this distinction should improve how functional findings are interpreted, reported, and compared across microbiome studies. Accordingly, functional studies should explicitly state whether their conclusions concern capacity, realization, or impact, thereby clarifying the evidential basis of functional claims and improving their interpretation and comparison across microbiome studies.
Related
- Identification and bioinformatic functional annotation of circRNAs mediating phenotypic differences in hair follicle cycling of Jinlan cashmere goats
- SelCysML: a hybrid ML-BLAST pipeline for the automated identification and functional annotation of bacterial selenoproteins
- Functional annotation of insulin-responsive genes in human adipocytes reveals PLCXD1 as a lipid storage regulator
- IonFusion: Multimodal Fusion for Hierarchical Classification and Functional Annotation of Ion Channels and Transporters
- Untargeted metabolomics in microbiome-immune crosstalk in cancer: challenges and recommendations for functional interpretation
BibTeX
@article{bajiya2026from,
title = {{From functional annotation to functional meaning in microbiome research}},
author = {Rajesh Kumar Bajiya and Rania Agabi and Jimena Olabarría García and Vicenzo Paolo Torreno and Jean Armengaud and Lucia Grenga},
journal = {Environmental Microbiome},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1186/s40793-026-00956-x},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05768801v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - From functional annotation to functional meaning in microbiome research
AU - Rajesh Kumar Bajiya
AU - Rania Agabi
AU - Jimena Olabarría García
AU - Vicenzo Paolo Torreno
AU - Jean Armengaud
AU - Lucia Grenga
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/02
JO - Environmental Microbiome
DO - 10.1186/s40793-026-00956-x
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05768801v1
AB - Microbiome research has moved from cataloging community composition to asking what these communities do, but "function" is often used to describe fundamentally different levels of evidence. Functional claims may refer to functional capacity (what is encoded), functional realization (what molecular functions are actively engaged under specific conditions), or functional impact (the resulting consequences for hosts, microbial communities, or ecosystems). In this Perspective, we examine how functional annotations in microbiome research generate biological meaning and why current approaches support different kinds of inference. We propose a framework that distinguishes three levels of functional inference: capacity, realization, and impact. Homology-based, domain-centric, pathway-based, machine learning-driven, and multi-omics approaches each contribute differently to these levels, but none alone captures microbiome function in full. We argue that microbiome function should be interpreted as a hierarchy of inferences rather than a single property. Recognizing this distinction should improve how functional findings are interpreted, reported, and compared across microbiome studies. Accordingly, functional studies should explicitly state whether their conclusions concern capacity, realization, or impact, thereby clarifying the evidential basis of functional claims and improving their interpretation and comparison across microbiome studies.
SN - 2524-6372
SN - 2524-6372
ER -