Determinants of Pneumococcal Vaccination Decision‐Making Among High‑Risk Adults: A Qualitative Study Guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework
- 1The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China
- 2Centre for Health Education and Health Promotion, Faculty of Medicine The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China
Abstract
Background and Aims: Pneumococcal disease (PD) poses a substantial burden among older adults and individuals with chronic conditions, yet pneumococcal vaccination uptake remains suboptimal in Hong Kong. Understanding the psychological, social, and contextual determinants of pneumococcal vaccination decision‑making is essential for strengthening adult vaccination strategies.
Methods: A qualitative study was conducted among 24 adults from pneumococcal vaccination target groups. Semi‑structured interviews explored perceptions, motivations, and barriers related to PD and pneumococcal vaccination. Data were analysed using thematic analysis informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). The TDF synthesizes constructs from behaviour change theories into 14 domains, enabling systematic examination of psychological, social, and contextual determinants of health behaviours.
Results: Over half of participants (13/24) expressed willingness to receive pneumococcal vaccination, though decisions were shaped by complex multi‑level influences. Trust in healthcare professionals and confidence in government recommendations, reflecting Social influences, emerged as commonly reported facilitators of vaccination. Financial support, such as subsidies or free vaccination, served as an important Reinforcement mechanism. The predominant barriers were limited understanding of pneumococcal vaccination and the vaccination programme (Knowledge), strong reliance on personal judgement in vaccination decision‐making (Social influences), and limited knowledge of PD (Knowledge). Participants also reported concerns about potential adverse effects (Beliefs about consequences), low perceived urgency (Intentions), and practical constraints, including limited accessibility of vaccination sites and appointment difficulties (Environmental context and resources), which were reported as additional barriers to vaccination.
Conclusions: Pneumococcal vaccination decision‐making among high‑risk adults was influenced by a combination of informational, psychological, social, and structural influences. Strengthening vaccine communication by healthcare professionals, improving awareness of and access to existing free or subsidised vaccination services, improving service accessibility, and delivering sustained public education may help address misconceptions, elevate perceived need, and improve pneumococcal vaccination coverage in Hong Kong.
Related
- Cost-effectiveness of 20-valent versus 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines for infants in the Netherlands, taking into account indirect effects and adult vaccination
- A Qualitative Study of Preventive Behaviors Among Patients Considered at High Risk of Lower Limb Lymphedema After Gynecological Cancer Surgery Using the Theoretical Domains Framework
- Impact of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination on non-invasive pneumococcal pneumonia: A regression discontinuity analysis
- Recommendations for Adult Pneumococcal Vaccination in Korea: 2026 Update Incorporating the 21-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine.
- Barriers and facilitators to using an app-based tool for suicide safety planning in a psychiatric emergency department: A qualitative descriptive study using the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B model
BibTeX
@article{zhong2026determinants,
title = {{Determinants of Pneumococcal Vaccination Decision‐Making Among High‑Risk Adults: A Qualitative Study Guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework}},
author = {Claire Chenwen Zhong and Mingtao Chen and Man Kin Yim and Sammi Ng and Junjie Huang and Martin C. S. Wong},
journal = {Health Science Reports},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1002/hsr2.73359},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.73359},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Determinants of Pneumococcal Vaccination Decision‐Making Among High‑Risk Adults: A Qualitative Study Guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework
AU - Claire Chenwen Zhong
AU - Mingtao Chen
AU - Man Kin Yim
AU - Sammi Ng
AU - Junjie Huang
AU - Martin C. S. Wong
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/25
JO - Health Science Reports
DO - 10.1002/hsr2.73359
UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.73359
AB - Background and Aims: Pneumococcal disease (PD) poses a substantial burden among older adults and individuals with chronic conditions, yet pneumococcal vaccination uptake remains suboptimal in Hong Kong. Understanding the psychological, social, and contextual determinants of pneumococcal vaccination decision‑making is essential for strengthening adult vaccination strategies. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted among 24 adults from pneumococcal vaccination target groups. Semi‑structured interviews explored perceptions, motivations, and barriers related to PD and pneumococcal vaccination. Data were analysed using thematic analysis informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). The TDF synthesizes constructs from behaviour change theories into 14 domains, enabling systematic examination of psychological, social, and contextual determinants of health behaviours. Results: Over half of participants (13/24) expressed willingness to receive pneumococcal vaccination, though decisions were shaped by complex multi‑level influences. Trust in healthcare professionals and confidence in government recommendations, reflecting Social influences, emerged as commonly reported facilitators of vaccination. Financial support, such as subsidies or free vaccination, served as an important Reinforcement mechanism. The predominant barriers were limited understanding of pneumococcal vaccination and the vaccination programme (Knowledge), strong reliance on personal judgement in vaccination decision‐making (Social influences), and limited knowledge of PD (Knowledge). Participants also reported concerns about potential adverse effects (Beliefs about consequences), low perceived urgency (Intentions), and practical constraints, including limited accessibility of vaccination sites and appointment difficulties (Environmental context and resources), which were reported as additional barriers to vaccination. Conclusions: Pneumococcal vaccination decision‐making among high‑risk adults was influenced by a combination of informational, psychological, social, and structural influences. Strengthening vaccine communication by healthcare professionals, improving awareness of and access to existing free or subsidised vaccination services, improving service accessibility, and delivering sustained public education may help address misconceptions, elevate perceived need, and improve pneumococcal vaccination coverage in Hong Kong.
SN - 2398-8835
ER -