Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,693 studies31 sourcesUpdated 19 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer

Association between cognitive social capital and saliva-related quality of life among head and neck cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study.

  1. 1Department of Pathology, Federal University of Santa Maria, Roraima Avenue, 1000, Building 20, Santa Maria, Rio Grande Do Sul, 97105-900, Brazil.
  2. 2Department of Stomatology, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil.
  3. 3Department of Pathology, Federal University of Santa Maria, Roraima Avenue, 1000, Building 20, Santa Maria, Rio Grande Do Sul, 97105-900, Brazil. [email protected].

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the association between cognitive social capital and patient-reported saliva-related quality of life among head and neck cancer survivors.Methods

This cross-sectional study included adults treated with curative intent for squamous cell carcinoma of the lip/oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx at a referral hospital in southern Brazil. The outcome was patient-reported saliva-related quality of life, assessed using the saliva domain of the University of Washington Quality of Life questionnaire (UW-QOL); higher scores indicate better outcomes. Cognitive social capital was assessed using a brief three-item proxy index; participants were classified as scoring 3 (the maximum) or below 3. Hierarchical multiple linear regression estimated unstandardised coefficients (B) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), adjusting for education, tumour location, radiotherapy (yes vs. no), and time since treatment completion. Sensitivity analyses tested alternative operationalisations and adjustments.Results

A total of 105 adults participated (response rate 84.7%). The mean UW-QOL saliva-domain score was 61.85 ± 33.90, and 18 participants (17.1%) scored below 3. In the fully adjusted model, a score below 3 was associated with poorer saliva-related quality of life (B = -18.53; 95% CI -33.85 to -3.21; p = 0.018); sensitivity analyses were consistent.Conclusion

In this exploratory study, lower scores on a three-item cognitive social capital proxy index were associated with poorer saliva-related quality of life among head and neck cancer survivors. Perceived social resources may be relevant to this burden, but these preliminary findings require confirmation in larger longitudinal studies.

Related

  1. Symptom network structure and its association with health-related quality of life in convalescent stroke survivors: a cross-sectional study
    Yiqing Zhang, Qihang Xu, Lina Chen +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  2. Association between Ebola prevention training and prevention-related cognitive and behavioral factors among Chinese expatriates in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: a cross-sectional study informed by the RANAS framework.
    Hao Xiao, Guangyuan Liu, Hengbo Gao +1
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textInfectious diseaseEurope PMCCrossref
  3. Association between physical activity and quality of life among breast cancer survivors in China: a cross-sectional mediation analysis
    Yingjie Yao, Qinqin Cheng, Andy S K Cheng +4
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textOncologyCrossref
  4. Physical Activity and Depressive Symptoms in Guangdong University Students: A Cross-Sectional Moderated Serial Indirect-Association Model Involving Self-Esteem, Positive Psychological Capital, and Perceived Social Support.
    Zhihui Liu, Zhijie Lai, Taufik Rihatno +2
    Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textPhysiologyEurope PMC
  5. Beyond survival: a cross-sectional analysis of guideline recommendations for cognitive, sexual, and psychological problems in adult cancer survivors
    Joshua Ayoson, Nadine Schneider, Brian Casanova +8
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{daros2026association,
  title = {{Association between cognitive social capital and saliva-related quality of life among head and neck cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study.}},
  author = {Alan Carvalho Darós and Jessica Klöckner Knorst and Bruno Emmanuelli and João Alberto de Almeida Gonçalves and Raquel Pippi Antoniazzi and Kívia Linhares Ferrazzo},
  journal = {Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1007/s00520-026-11361-y},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42911444},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Association between cognitive social capital and saliva-related quality of life among head and neck cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study.
AU  - Alan Carvalho Darós
AU  - Jessica Klöckner Knorst
AU  - Bruno Emmanuelli
AU  - João Alberto de Almeida Gonçalves
AU  - Raquel Pippi Antoniazzi
AU  - Kívia Linhares Ferrazzo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
JO  - Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer
DO  - 10.1007/s00520-026-11361-y
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42911444
AB  - Purpose  To evaluate the association between cognitive social capital and patient-reported saliva-related quality of life among head and neck cancer survivors.Methods  This cross-sectional study included adults treated with curative intent for squamous cell carcinoma of the lip/oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx at a referral hospital in southern Brazil. The outcome was patient-reported saliva-related quality of life, assessed using the saliva domain of the University of Washington Quality of Life questionnaire (UW-QOL); higher scores indicate better outcomes. Cognitive social capital was assessed using a brief three-item proxy index; participants were classified as scoring 3 (the maximum) or below 3. Hierarchical multiple linear regression estimated unstandardised coefficients (B) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), adjusting for education, tumour location, radiotherapy (yes vs. no), and time since treatment completion. Sensitivity analyses tested alternative operationalisations and adjustments.Results  A total of 105 adults participated (response rate 84.7%). The mean UW-QOL saliva-domain score was 61.85 ± 33.90, and 18 participants (17.1%) scored below 3. In the fully adjusted model, a score below 3 was associated with poorer saliva-related quality of life (B = -18.53; 95% CI -33.85 to -3.21; p = 0.018); sensitivity analyses were consistent.Conclusion  In this exploratory study, lower scores on a three-item cognitive social capital proxy index were associated with poorer saliva-related quality of life among head and neck cancer survivors. Perceived social resources may be relevant to this burden, but these preliminary findings require confirmation in larger longitudinal studies.
SN  - 0941-4355
SN  - 1433-7339
ER  -