Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYVeterinary sciences

Deep Learning and Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Infrared-Thermography-Based CMT-Status Classification in Dairy Cows: A Comparative Evaluation in Egyptian Farms.

6 affiliations
  1. 1Department Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Computers and Artificial Intelligence, Benha University, Benha 19111, Egypt.
  2. 2Department of Scientific Computing, Faculty of Computers and Artificial Intelligence, Benha University, Benha 19111, Egypt.
  3. 3Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computers and Artificial Intelligence, Misr University for Science and Technology (MUST), Giza P.O. Box 77, Egypt.
  4. 4The Egyptian School of Data Science (ESDS), Benha, Egypt.
  5. 5Department of Animal and Poultry Production, College of Agriculture and Food, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia.
  6. 6Animal Production Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza 12618, Egypt.

Abstract

Early and accurate identification of mastitis-associated inflammation is critical to increasing animal comfort, reducing financial losses, and enhancing milk quality. Although infrared thermography (IRT) has emerged as a viable non-invasive screening technique, the relative efficacy of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and Vision Transformers (ViTs) for automated CMT-status classification from thermal udder pictures is still unknown. This work carefully analyzed seven ImageNet-pretrained deep learning architectures using 976 thermal udder images (708 healthy and 268 mastitic images) from 488 Holstein cows (354 healthy cows, 708 images; 134 mastitic cows, 268 images), including two Vision Transformer models (ViT-B/16 and Swin-Tiny) and five CNN models (ResNet-50, DenseNet-121, EfficientNet-B0, MobileNetV2, Inception-V3). Before training, pictures were preprocessed using contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE), scaled to 224 × 224 pixels, and divided using cow-oriented grouping intended to reduce animal-level data leakage (this grouping could not be independently verified against a ground-truth cow roster; see Limitations). Each model was developed from start to finish and evaluated using an independent hold-out test set and five-fold animal-level cross-validation. DenseNet-121 had the greatest results on the hold-out test set, with an accuracy of 82.2%, an AUC of 0.922, a sensitivity of 90.0%, and a specificity of 79.2%. Additionally, it achieved the highest cross-validation performance (mean AUC = 0.914 ± 0.019). According to statistical analysis, DenseNet-121 was statistically indistinguishable from Inception-V3 under both tests and from ResNet-50 under the more conservative corrected resampled t-test, but significantly outperformed EfficientNet-B0, MobileNetV2, and both Vision Transformers (p < 0.05), while all CNN models outperformed both Vision Transformer models (p < 0.05). Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) investigation utilizing Grad-CAM corroborated the biological plausibility of the learnt plausibility characteristics by showing that heat patterns in the udder region had a significant impact on model predictions. Grad-CAM analysis showed that heat patterns in the udder region partly drove model predictions, though attention was occasionally influenced by background regions. The best-performing model was tested without retraining on an independent external cohort of 85 cows from a different farm. Although external performance decreased (accuracy = 60.0%; Cohen's κ = 0.199), consistent with the expected effects of domain shift, the somatic cell count was significantly higher in CMT-positive cows (p < 0.001; AUC = 0.783), supporting the biological significance of the identified thermal abnormalities. Fine-tuned CNNs, led by DenseNet-121, delivered accurate and reproducible thermal CMT-status classification under internal cross-validation, but transportability to an independent farm was limited (external accuracy = 0.600, κ = 0.199), indicating that domain adaptation and multi-farm validation are needed before broader deployment. These findings provide strong support for the application of CNN-based deep learning in IRT-assisted CMT-status screening while highlighting the necessity for larger multicenter datasets to further evaluate transformer-based approaches. aptation and multi-farm validation are needed before broader deployment. These findings provide strong support for the application of CNN-based deep learning in IRT-assisted mastitis screening while highlighting the necessity for larger multicenter datasets to further evaluate transformer-based approaches.

Related

  1. Physics-Informed and Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Nanomaterial-Based Biosensors: From Sensor Design and Signal Processing to Clinical Translation
    Stefano Bellucci
    Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biologyEurope PMCDOAJ
  2. Explainable artificial intelligence reveals spatially divergent effects of global change on mammals
    Lei Song, Amy E. Frazier, Peter Kedron +10
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyCrossref
  3. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) and Molecular Modeling Techniques to Discover Putative HER2 Inhibitors
    Shailima Rampogu, Thananjeyan Balasubramaniyam, Cheol-Hee Yoon +3
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biologyHAL
  4. Explainable plant disease classification and severity assessment using MobileNetV3-large for crop health monitoring
    Kuntal Gaur, Ritik Mittal, Bisant Chowdhury +3
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPlant biologyCrossref
  5. A hybrid SE-ResNet50 deep learning framework for high-accuracy and explainable cotton leaf disease classification
    Emrah Aslan, Yıldırım ÖZÜPAK
    BMC Plant BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND17 citedPlant biologyOpenAlex
BibTeX
@article{elmaria2026deep,
  title = {{Deep Learning and Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Infrared-Thermography-Based CMT-Status Classification in Dairy Cows: A Comparative Evaluation in Egyptian Farms.}},
  author = {Alaa T Elmaria and Elsayed Badr and Sobhy M A Sallam and Marwa F A Attia and Sara Swedian},
  journal = {Veterinary sciences},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3390/vetsci13101031},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42944128},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Deep Learning and Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Infrared-Thermography-Based CMT-Status Classification in Dairy Cows: A Comparative Evaluation in Egyptian Farms.
AU  - Alaa T Elmaria
AU  - Elsayed Badr
AU  - Sobhy M A Sallam
AU  - Marwa F A Attia
AU  - Sara Swedian
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/29
JO  - Veterinary sciences
DO  - 10.3390/vetsci13101031
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42944128
AB  - Early and accurate identification of mastitis-associated inflammation is critical to increasing animal comfort, reducing financial losses, and enhancing milk quality. Although infrared thermography (IRT) has emerged as a viable non-invasive screening technique, the relative efficacy of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and Vision Transformers (ViTs) for automated CMT-status classification from thermal udder pictures is still unknown. This work carefully analyzed seven ImageNet-pretrained deep learning architectures using 976 thermal udder images (708 healthy and 268 mastitic images) from 488 Holstein cows (354 healthy cows, 708 images; 134 mastitic cows, 268 images), including two Vision Transformer models (ViT-B/16 and Swin-Tiny) and five CNN models (ResNet-50, DenseNet-121, EfficientNet-B0, MobileNetV2, Inception-V3). Before training, pictures were preprocessed using contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE), scaled to 224 × 224 pixels, and divided using cow-oriented grouping intended to reduce animal-level data leakage (this grouping could not be independently verified against a ground-truth cow roster; see Limitations). Each model was developed from start to finish and evaluated using an independent hold-out test set and five-fold animal-level cross-validation. DenseNet-121 had the greatest results on the hold-out test set, with an accuracy of 82.2%, an AUC of 0.922, a sensitivity of 90.0%, and a specificity of 79.2%. Additionally, it achieved the highest cross-validation performance (mean AUC = 0.914 ± 0.019). According to statistical analysis, DenseNet-121 was statistically indistinguishable from Inception-V3 under both tests and from ResNet-50 under the more conservative corrected resampled t-test, but significantly outperformed EfficientNet-B0, MobileNetV2, and both Vision Transformers (p < 0.05), while all CNN models outperformed both Vision Transformer models (p < 0.05). Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) investigation utilizing Grad-CAM corroborated the biological plausibility of the learnt plausibility characteristics by showing that heat patterns in the udder region had a significant impact on model predictions. Grad-CAM analysis showed that heat patterns in the udder region partly drove model predictions, though attention was occasionally influenced by background regions. The best-performing model was tested without retraining on an independent external cohort of 85 cows from a different farm. Although external performance decreased (accuracy = 60.0%; Cohen's κ = 0.199), consistent with the expected effects of domain shift, the somatic cell count was significantly higher in CMT-positive cows (p < 0.001; AUC = 0.783), supporting the biological significance of the identified thermal abnormalities. Fine-tuned CNNs, led by DenseNet-121, delivered accurate and reproducible thermal CMT-status classification under internal cross-validation, but transportability to an independent farm was limited (external accuracy = 0.600, κ = 0.199), indicating that domain adaptation and multi-farm validation are needed before broader deployment. These findings provide strong support for the application of CNN-based deep learning in IRT-assisted CMT-status screening while highlighting the necessity for larger multicenter datasets to further evaluate transformer-based approaches. aptation and multi-farm validation are needed before broader deployment. These findings provide strong support for the application of CNN-based deep learning in IRT-assisted mastitis screening while highlighting the necessity for larger multicenter datasets to further evaluate transformer-based approaches.
SN  - 2306-7381
ER  -