Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 54 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira

Magnetic resonance imaging radiomics for predicting pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

  1. 1Afyonkarahisar University of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology – Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.

Abstract

SUMMARY: OBJECTIVE:: The aim of this study was to develop and validate machine learning models integrating clinical and pre-treatment dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging radiomic features for predicting pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

METHODS:: This retrospective study analyzed 299 breast cancer patients from the publicly available Duke Breast Cancer magnetic resonance imaging dataset who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. From pre-treatment dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, 534 IBSI-compliant radiomic features were extracted. A five-method consensus feature selection pipeline retained 24 features. Notably, three prediction models were developed: clinical-only (Model A), radiomic-only (Model B), and combined clinical–radiomic (Model C). In total, seven machine learning algorithms were compared using 20 repeated five-fold stratified cross-validation with SMOTE applied within each training fold and assessed on a held-out test set (30%, n=90). Performance was evaluated using AUC with bootstrap confidence intervals, calibration (Brier score), and decision curve analysis.

RESULTS:: The pathologic complete response rate was 20.4% (61/299). The combined model (Gradient Boosting) achieved the highest test AUC of 0.723 (95%CI 0.595–0.835), with sensitivity of 0.333 and specificity of 0.833. DeLong tests revealed no statistically significant differences between model pairs (all p>0.05). Decision curve analysis demonstrated the highest net benefit for the combined model across 10–50% threshold probabilities.

CONCLUSION:: The combined clinical–radiomic model demonstrated modest discriminative ability for pathologic complete response prediction. The limited sensitivity suggests potential utility as a rule-out test to identify patients unlikely to achieve pathologic complete response. These hypothesis-generating findings require external validation in independent multi-center cohorts.

Related

  1. Mammography based delta radiomics with machine learning predicts pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
    Xiaohang Hu, Yanfang Liu, Yuan Gao +7
    Discover OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMedical imaging & radiologyDOAJ
  2. Development and validation of a nomogram predicting pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in luminal type breast cancer patients using MammaPrint® and clinicopathological factor
    Sarah Al safi, Tae Kyung Yoo, Jisun Kim +6
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyPLOS
  3. Incremental Value and Cross-Center Validation of Pretreatment Tri-Modal Ultrasound Deep Learning for Predicting Breast Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Multicenter Study
    Chuanmin Wei, Ting Pan, Tiangang Li +3
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMedical imaging & radiologyCrossrefEurope PMC
  4. Pretreatment Body Composition and Its Association with Pathologic Complete Response and Survival in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Erhan Tükel, Süleyman Özkan Aksoy, Ali İbrahim Sevinç +9
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. AI expert collaborative generative model for predicting pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in NSCLC
    Minghao Hu, Fangfang Liu, Wei Nie +7
    Communications MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textMedical imaging & radiologyCrossref
BibTeX
@article{demirel2026magnetic,
  title = {{Magnetic resonance imaging radiomics for predicting pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer}},
  author = {Emin Demirel and Huseyin Coskun},
  journal = {Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1590/1806-9282.20260878},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20260878},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Magnetic resonance imaging radiomics for predicting pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
AU  - Emin Demirel
AU  - Huseyin Coskun
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/02
JO  - Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
DO  - 10.1590/1806-9282.20260878
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20260878
AB  - SUMMARY: OBJECTIVE:: The aim of this study was to develop and validate machine learning models integrating clinical and pre-treatment dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging radiomic features for predicting pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.  METHODS:: This retrospective study analyzed 299 breast cancer patients from the publicly available Duke Breast Cancer magnetic resonance imaging dataset who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. From pre-treatment dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, 534 IBSI-compliant radiomic features were extracted. A five-method consensus feature selection pipeline retained 24 features. Notably, three prediction models were developed: clinical-only (Model A), radiomic-only (Model B), and combined clinical–radiomic (Model C). In total, seven machine learning algorithms were compared using 20 repeated five-fold stratified cross-validation with SMOTE applied within each training fold and assessed on a held-out test set (30%, n=90). Performance was evaluated using AUC with bootstrap confidence intervals, calibration (Brier score), and decision curve analysis.  RESULTS:: The pathologic complete response rate was 20.4% (61/299). The combined model (Gradient Boosting) achieved the highest test AUC of 0.723 (95%CI 0.595–0.835), with sensitivity of 0.333 and specificity of 0.833. DeLong tests revealed no statistically significant differences between model pairs (all p>0.05). Decision curve analysis demonstrated the highest net benefit for the combined model across 10–50% threshold probabilities.  CONCLUSION:: The combined clinical–radiomic model demonstrated modest discriminative ability for pathologic complete response prediction. The limited sensitivity suggests potential utility as a rule-out test to identify patients unlikely to achieve pathologic complete response. These hypothesis-generating findings require external validation in independent multi-center cohorts.
SN  - 0104-4230
SN  - 1806-9282
ER  -