Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 46 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDBMC pregnancy and childbirth

Self-operated home ultrasound for pre-labor pushing training: a proof-of-concept study.

5 affiliations
  1. 1Helen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center - Beilinson Hospital, 39 Jabotinski St., Petach Tikva, 4941492, Israel. [email protected].
  2. 2Gray Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. [email protected].
  3. 3Helen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center - Beilinson Hospital, 39 Jabotinski St., Petach Tikva, 4941492, Israel.
  4. 4Gray Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  5. 5Bob Shapell School of Social Work, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of self-operated home ultrasound for visual biofeedback training among nulliparous women, enabling visualization of fetal head descent and practice of second-stage pushing prior to labor.Methods

This was a prospective feasibility study conducted within the framework of an ongoing randomized controlled trial. Term nulliparous women at 37-41 weeks' gestation underwent an in-hospital transperineal ultrasound session with visual biofeedback, including real-time assessment of the angle of progression. Participants were subsequently instructed to perform home training using a self-operated handheld ultrasound device. Ultrasound clips were recorded and reviewed offline. Feasibility outcomes included session completion rates, proportion of interpretable clips, and successful acquisition of AoP measurements. Acceptability was assessed through open-ended feedback and participants' reported willingness to recommend the intervention.Results

Thirty women were enrolled, of whom 25 (83%) completed at least one home training session. A total of 96 home sessions were recorded (median 3 per participant, IQR 1.0-Ff.0, range 0-10), of which 88 (92%) were interpretable for AoP analysis. Coached pushing efforts during home training resulted in measurable changes in AoP (mean ΔAoP 14.4° ± 8.8°). No device-related adverse events were reported.Conclusion

Self-operated home transperineal ultrasound for visual biofeedback is feasible, safe, and well accepted for pre-labor pushing training. Participants were able to acquire interpretable images and engage effectively with the biofeedback process. These findings support further evaluation of this approach in larger studies assessing its impact on labor outcomes and its integration into telemedicine-based prenatal care.

Related

  1. Physiological Versus Directed Pushing During the Second Stage of Labor: A Non-Randomized Quasi-Experimental Study of Maternal Recovery and Clinical Outcomes.
    Alya Mansour Alshamrani, Nouran Essam Katooa, Safaa Gaber Aly Salem +4
    Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsEurope PMC
  2. A Semi-Automated Interactive Annotation Framework for Intraoperative Neurosurgical Ultrasound: A Proof-of-Concept Study
    R. Bertani, S. Bahadir, M. Y. Ferreira +3
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textMedical imaging & radiologymedRxiv
  3. Impact of intrapartum ultrasound on mode of delivery guidance and adverse pregnancy outcomes in primigravidae undergoing vaginal trial labor.
    Xu Chen, Wei Li, Hualin Li +6
    Archives of gynecology and obstetricsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsEurope PMCDOAJ
  4. Handheld Ultrasound Implementation and Structured Point‐of‐Care Ultrasound Training Across the Indo‐Pacific: Programmatic Lessons From the PEARLS Program
    Wai Chung Tse, Theodore Ajluni, Micah Misivet +5
    Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in MedicinePeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textGeneral medicinePMC
  5. Research progress and practical applications of musculoskeletal ultrasound in military training injuries
    Shuo Wang, Hanhan Xu, Qianqian Liu +2
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{hendin2026selfoperated,
  title = {{Self-operated home ultrasound for pre-labor pushing training: a proof-of-concept study.}},
  author = {Natav Hendin and Amit Shachak and Dorit Asher and Roni Yoeli-Bik and Eran Hadar and Yael Benyamini and Sharon Perlman},
  journal = {BMC pregnancy and childbirth},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s12884-026-09649-2},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42958513},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Self-operated home ultrasound for pre-labor pushing training: a proof-of-concept study.
AU  - Natav Hendin
AU  - Amit Shachak
AU  - Dorit Asher
AU  - Roni Yoeli-Bik
AU  - Eran Hadar
AU  - Yael Benyamini
AU  - Sharon Perlman
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/22
JO  - BMC pregnancy and childbirth
DO  - 10.1186/s12884-026-09649-2
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42958513
AB  - Objective  To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of self-operated home ultrasound for visual biofeedback training among nulliparous women, enabling visualization of fetal head descent and practice of second-stage pushing prior to labor.Methods  This was a prospective feasibility study conducted within the framework of an ongoing randomized controlled trial. Term nulliparous women at 37-41 weeks' gestation underwent an in-hospital transperineal ultrasound session with visual biofeedback, including real-time assessment of the angle of progression. Participants were subsequently instructed to perform home training using a self-operated handheld ultrasound device. Ultrasound clips were recorded and reviewed offline. Feasibility outcomes included session completion rates, proportion of interpretable clips, and successful acquisition of AoP measurements. Acceptability was assessed through open-ended feedback and participants' reported willingness to recommend the intervention.Results  Thirty women were enrolled, of whom 25 (83%) completed at least one home training session. A total of 96 home sessions were recorded (median 3 per participant, IQR 1.0-Ff.0, range 0-10), of which 88 (92%) were interpretable for AoP analysis. Coached pushing efforts during home training resulted in measurable changes in AoP (mean ΔAoP 14.4° ± 8.8°). No device-related adverse events were reported.Conclusion  Self-operated home transperineal ultrasound for visual biofeedback is feasible, safe, and well accepted for pre-labor pushing training. Participants were able to acquire interpretable images and engage effectively with the biofeedback process. These findings support further evaluation of this approach in larger studies assessing its impact on labor outcomes and its integration into telemedicine-based prenatal care.
SN  - 1471-2393
ER  -