Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 20 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Big data, differential privacy, and national statistical organisations

Abstract

Differential privacy (DP) has emerged in the computer science literature as a measure of the impact on an individual's privacy resulting from the publication of a statistical output such as a frequency table. This paper provides an introduction to DP for official statisticians and discuss its relevance, benefits, and challenges from a National Statistical Organisation (NSO) perspective. We motivate our study by examining how privacy is evolving in the era of big data and how this might prompt a shift from traditional statistical disclosure techniques used in official statistics--which are generally applied on a cell-by-cell or table-by-table basis--to formal privacy methods, like DP, which are applied from a perspective encompassing the totality of the outputs generated from a given dataset. We identify an important interplay between DP's holistic privacy risk measure and the difficulty for NSOs in implementing DP, showing that DP's major advantage is also DP's major challenge. This paper provides new work addressing two key DP research areas for NSOs: DP's application to survey data and its incorporation within the Five Safes framework.

Versions

Related

  1. Prophet Inequalities under Local Differential Privacy
    Achraf Azize, Mathieu Molina, Hugo Richard +1
    HALPreprintLicence not statedGeneral mathematicsHAL
  2. Performative Privacy: When Differential Privacy Maximizes Utility
    Uddalak Mukherjee, Edwige Cyffers, Yann Chevaleyre
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Statistical and Privacy Guarantees for Deep M-Regression via Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics
    Yeheng Ge, Jian Huang, Shuyuan Wu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Phantoms and Disclosures: A Statistical Framework for Auditing Privacy in Synthetic Data
    Kareem Amin, Rudrajit Das, Alessandro Epasto +4
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Task-aware Kernel Stein certificates for Rényi differential privacy
    Leoni Carla Wirth, Tara Trauthwein, Gesine Reinert
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{bailie2026data,
  title = {{Big data, differential privacy, and national statistical organisations}},
  author = {James Bailie},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.02495},
  eprint = {2609.02495},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02495},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Big data, differential privacy, and national statistical organisations
AU  - James Bailie
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/02
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.02495
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02495
AB  - Differential privacy (DP) has emerged in the computer science literature as a measure of the impact on an individual's privacy resulting from the publication of a statistical output such as a frequency table. This paper provides an introduction to DP for official statisticians and discuss its relevance, benefits, and challenges from a National Statistical Organisation (NSO) perspective. We motivate our study by examining how privacy is evolving in the era of big data and how this might prompt a shift from traditional statistical disclosure techniques used in official statistics--which are generally applied on a cell-by-cell or table-by-table basis--to formal privacy methods, like DP, which are applied from a perspective encompassing the totality of the outputs generated from a given dataset. We identify an important interplay between DP's holistic privacy risk measure and the difficulty for NSOs in implementing DP, showing that DP's major advantage is also DP's major challenge. This paper provides new work addressing two key DP research areas for NSOs: DP's application to survey data and its incorporation within the Five Safes framework.
ER  -