Hidden Mortality: Bottom Trawling Challenges the Legal Protection of Vulnerable Marine Species
- 1The Society for the Protection of Nature in Israel Tel Aviv‐Yafo Israel
- 2Department of Animal Sciences Hula Research Center Tel Hai Academic College Upper Galilee Israel
- 3Israel Oceanographic and Limnological Research The National Institute of Oceanography Haifa Israel
Abstract
Legal protection of species is a central conservation instrument, yet its effectiveness depends on limiting incidental harm. Bottom trawl fisheries are inherently nonselective and frequently capture nontarget species. This creates a legal–management inconsistency: Bottom trawling remains permitted, whereas protected‐species statutes prohibit harm or disturbance. Reconciling these policies requires that capture of protected species be rare and strictly incidental. Using standardized bottom trawl surveys in the Israeli Mediterranean, where bottom trawl fishing is strictly regulated spatially and seasonally, we quantified hourly capture rates of legally protected taxa. A mean of ∼53 protected individuals were captured per trawling hour, peaking at 80 m depth (147.7 individuals h−1), dominated by Pennatula rubra. Elasmobranchs were also captured (∼2.6 individuals h−1), including vulnerable, endangered, and critically endangered species. These results suggest that even under stringent regulation, species‐focused protection may be insufficient where bottom trawling persists. Precautionary interaction‐reducing measures, including stronger spatial restrictions, are therefore required.
Related
- Searching for Habitable Conditions in the Solar System: Issues and Challenges from the Planetary Protection Perspective
- Marine heat waves in vulnerable coral reef regions are skillfully predictable on multi-year timescales
- Identifying Arctic states vulnerable to rapid ice loss with a convolutional neural network
- Conflict with industrial fleets undermines the contributions of small-scale fisheries to sustainable development in vulnerable regions.
- Asymmetric response of vegetation NPP to extreme climate over a vulnerable karst Region in Southwest China
BibTeX
@article{shabtay2026hidden,
title = {{Hidden Mortality: Bottom Trawling Challenges the Legal Protection of Vulnerable Marine Species}},
author = {Ateret Shabtay and Dana Kruger and Erez Yeruham and Alon Rothschild},
journal = {Conservation Letters},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1111/con4.70087},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/con4.70087},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Hidden Mortality: Bottom Trawling Challenges the Legal Protection of Vulnerable Marine Species
AU - Ateret Shabtay
AU - Dana Kruger
AU - Erez Yeruham
AU - Alon Rothschild
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/01
JO - Conservation Letters
DO - 10.1111/con4.70087
UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/con4.70087
AB - Legal protection of species is a central conservation instrument, yet its effectiveness depends on limiting incidental harm. Bottom trawl fisheries are inherently nonselective and frequently capture nontarget species. This creates a legal–management inconsistency: Bottom trawling remains permitted, whereas protected‐species statutes prohibit harm or disturbance. Reconciling these policies requires that capture of protected species be rare and strictly incidental. Using standardized bottom trawl surveys in the Israeli Mediterranean, where bottom trawl fishing is strictly regulated spatially and seasonally, we quantified hourly capture rates of legally protected taxa. A mean of ∼53 protected individuals were captured per trawling hour, peaking at 80 m depth (147.7 individuals h−1), dominated by Pennatula rubra. Elasmobranchs were also captured (∼2.6 individuals h−1), including vulnerable, endangered, and critically endangered species. These results suggest that even under stringent regulation, species‐focused protection may be insufficient where bottom trawling persists. Precautionary interaction‐reducing measures, including stronger spatial restrictions, are therefore required.
SN - 1755-263X
ER -