Effect of Screen Time on Social, Emotional, and Behavioural Problems in Children at a Tertiary Care Centre
- 1Paediatrics, Sharda University School of Medical Sciences and Research, Greater Noida, IND
- 2Paediatrics and Child Health, Sharda University School of Medical Sciences and Research, Greater Noida, IND
Abstract
Background
Electronic screen-based media use among children has surged globally due to rapid technological advances, wide device availability, and evolving family routines. Excessive screen time affects cognitive development by reducing executive functioning, impairing memory retention, and limiting problem-solving. Behavioral problems, such as hyperactivity, aggression, and attention disorders, are also linked to excessive screen use.
Methods
A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted among 118 children aged 18 months to five years attending a tertiary care pediatric OPD over 18 months. Eligible children were enrolled by consecutive sampling. Screen exposure was assessed using the "Seven in Seven" questionnaire, categorized as high (≥7) or low (<7). Behavioral problems were evaluated using the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1.5-5 (CBCL/1.5-5), administered to all 118 children (confirmed against the master chart). Associations between screen exposure, behavioral outcomes, and risk factors were analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test when the expected cell count was <5. A p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Standard multivariable logistic regression was unusable due to quasi-complete separation between screen exposure and several covariates, so Firth's penalized-likelihood logistic regression was used instead to identify independent factors, reporting adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% CIs.
Results
Mean age was 3.59 ± 1.27 years; 67.8% were boys. Mean screen time score was 8.54 ± 2.99. CBCL classification is as follows: 62.71% clinical, 19.49% borderline, and 17.80% normal. The high exposure group (n = 78, 66.1%) is the following: 72 (92.3%) clinical, 5 (6.4%) borderline, and 1 (1.3%) normal; the low exposure group (n = 40, 33.9%) is the following: 20 (50.0%) normal, 18 (45.0%) borderline, and 2 (5.0%) clinical (χ² = 87.60, df = 2, p < 0.001). Externalizing problems (59.4%) predominated over internalizing (28.3%). On bivariate analysis, high exposure was significantly associated with lower physical activity (Welch t = 7.83, df = 60.7, p < 0.001), father's education (FET = 86.41, p < 0.001), mother's education (FET = 56.71, p < 0.001), father's occupation (FET = 110.85, p < 0.001), mother's occupation (FET = 69.11, p < 0.001), and family type (FET = 52.69, p < 0.001; all Fisher's exact given sparse cells); residence (p = 0.841) and sibling presence (p = 0.054) were not significant. In multivariable Firth regression, only father's occupation remained independent (skilled vs unskilled: aOR = 133.1, 95% CI: 4.3-4099.8, p = 0.005; professional vs unskilled: aOR = 577.1, 95% CI: 10.3-32198.4, p = 0.002); physical activity, father's education, family type, and sibling presence lost significance after adjustment.
Conclusions
In this cross-sectional, tertiary-care OPD-based sample, high screen exposure was significantly associated with clinically significant behavioral problems in preschool children, predominantly externalizing symptoms. Given the cross-sectional design and referral-based sampling, findings should be interpreted as associational rather than causal and are most generalizable to symptomatic children presenting to tertiary care rather than the general preschool population.
Related
- Emotional and behavioural problems and non-suicidal self-injury in preadolescent children: complementary insights from child and parent reports
- Early emotional and behavioural problems and risk of unintentional injuries among children in Sweden
- Professionals' perspectives on barriers to improving psychosocial care for adolescents with emotional and behavioural problems - a concept mapping case study.
- Psychometric Properties of a 20-Item Adapted Version of the Ontario Child Health Study Emotional Behavioural Scales for Population-Based Research
- Digital wellbeing in the social media era: dual pathway analysis of emotional and behavioural distress indicators and public health utility
BibTeX
@article{wani2026effect,
title = {{Effect of Screen Time on Social, Emotional, and Behavioural Problems in Children at a Tertiary Care Centre}},
author = {Romana Wani and Pradeep Kumar and Bindu T Nair and Rajeev K Thapar and Praneta Swarup and Smita Nair},
journal = {Cureus},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.7759/cureus.116955},
url = {https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.116955},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Effect of Screen Time on Social, Emotional, and Behavioural Problems in Children at a Tertiary Care Centre
AU - Romana Wani
AU - Pradeep Kumar
AU - Bindu T Nair
AU - Rajeev K Thapar
AU - Praneta Swarup
AU - Smita Nair
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/26
JO - Cureus
DO - 10.7759/cureus.116955
UR - https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.116955
AB - Background Electronic screen-based media use among children has surged globally due to rapid technological advances, wide device availability, and evolving family routines. Excessive screen time affects cognitive development by reducing executive functioning, impairing memory retention, and limiting problem-solving. Behavioral problems, such as hyperactivity, aggression, and attention disorders, are also linked to excessive screen use. Methods A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted among 118 children aged 18 months to five years attending a tertiary care pediatric OPD over 18 months. Eligible children were enrolled by consecutive sampling. Screen exposure was assessed using the "Seven in Seven" questionnaire, categorized as high (≥7) or low (<7). Behavioral problems were evaluated using the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1.5-5 (CBCL/1.5-5), administered to all 118 children (confirmed against the master chart). Associations between screen exposure, behavioral outcomes, and risk factors were analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test when the expected cell count was <5. A p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Standard multivariable logistic regression was unusable due to quasi-complete separation between screen exposure and several covariates, so Firth's penalized-likelihood logistic regression was used instead to identify independent factors, reporting adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% CIs. Results Mean age was 3.59 ± 1.27 years; 67.8% were boys. Mean screen time score was 8.54 ± 2.99. CBCL classification is as follows: 62.71% clinical, 19.49% borderline, and 17.80% normal. The high exposure group (n = 78, 66.1%) is the following: 72 (92.3%) clinical, 5 (6.4%) borderline, and 1 (1.3%) normal; the low exposure group (n = 40, 33.9%) is the following: 20 (50.0%) normal, 18 (45.0%) borderline, and 2 (5.0%) clinical (χ² = 87.60, df = 2, p < 0.001). Externalizing problems (59.4%) predominated over internalizing (28.3%). On bivariate analysis, high exposure was significantly associated with lower physical activity (Welch t = 7.83, df = 60.7, p < 0.001), father's education (FET = 86.41, p < 0.001), mother's education (FET = 56.71, p < 0.001), father's occupation (FET = 110.85, p < 0.001), mother's occupation (FET = 69.11, p < 0.001), and family type (FET = 52.69, p < 0.001; all Fisher's exact given sparse cells); residence (p = 0.841) and sibling presence (p = 0.054) were not significant. In multivariable Firth regression, only father's occupation remained independent (skilled vs unskilled: aOR = 133.1, 95% CI: 4.3-4099.8, p = 0.005; professional vs unskilled: aOR = 577.1, 95% CI: 10.3-32198.4, p = 0.002); physical activity, father's education, family type, and sibling presence lost significance after adjustment. Conclusions In this cross-sectional, tertiary-care OPD-based sample, high screen exposure was significantly associated with clinically significant behavioral problems in preschool children, predominantly externalizing symptoms. Given the cross-sectional design and referral-based sampling, findings should be interpreted as associational rather than causal and are most generalizable to symptomatic children presenting to tertiary care rather than the general preschool population.
SN - 2168-8184
ER -