Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 19 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of Basic and Applied Zoology

Cichlid trophic morphology in the Cross River reflects ecological adaptation to diverse feeding strategies and habitat conditions

  1. 1Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Calabar

Abstract

Objective This study investigated the ecomorphological variation and trophic specialization of cichlid species in the Cross River, Nigeria, to understand how morphology, diet, and habitat interact to drive ecological diversity. Methodology Eight cichlid species were sampled from three sections of the Cross River (upper, middle, and lower reaches). Morphometric traits (e.g., standard length, gut length, gape width) were measured and analyzed using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Discriminant Function Analysis (DFA). Stomach content analysis was conducted to assess dietary composition, and trophic guilds were defined. Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) was used to explore relationships between morphology, diet, and environmental variables such as dissolved oxygen, substrate type, and vegetation cover. Results Morphometric traits differed significantly among species, with Oreochromis niloticus having the highest standard length (145.2 mm) and Sarotherodon melanotheron exhibiting the longest gut length (190.2 mm). PCA revealed that PC1 explained 47.8% of total variance, primarily influenced by standard length and body depth, while DFA showed a 65.1% separation among species based on trophic traits (Wilks’ λ = 0.324, p < 0.001). Diet analysis revealed that detritus (IRI = 6590.4) and algae (IRI = 3128.3) were dominant food items. Trophic guild classification identified omnivores, herbivores, insectivores, and detritivores, with omnivores showing the highest niche breadth (Levins’ index = 0.68) and trophic overlap (mean Pianka’s index = 0.74). CCA explained 68.5% of the variance in diet-morphology-environment relationships, confirming that species distributions were linked to environmental gradients and feeding adaptations. Conclusion Cichlid trophic morphology in the Cross River reflects ecological adaptation to diverse feeding strategies and habitat conditions. Morphological traits are strong predictors of diet and guild membership, and environmental factors further shape their ecological roles. These findings advance our understanding of functional diversity in African freshwater ecosystems and provide a reference point for biodiversity conservation in tropical riverine habitats.

Related

  1. Calcium oxalate kidney stone morphology reflects underlying metabolic and clinical conditions
    Valentine Forté, Ellie Tang, Dominique Bazin +8
    World Journal of UrologyPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textGeneral biologyGeneral medicineHAL
  2. Differential Adaptation of Osteocyte Lacunar Morphology at Bone (Re)modeling Sites under Mechanical Loading and Pharmacological Therapies in a Mouse Model of Osteoporosis
    S. Lindenmann, Z. Li, C. Weigt +5
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textSystems & synthetic biologybioRxiv
  3. Plants and low oxygen: from sensing and signalling to ecological adaptation and crop resilience.
    Takeshi Fukao, Motoyuki Ashikari, Mikio Nakazono
    Journal of experimental botanyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyEurope PMC
  4. Halophyte-associated salt-tolerant rhizobacteria: ecological adaptation, mechanistic pathways, and translational relevance for wheat salinity tolerance
    Csengele Barta, Beatrice Kelemen, Stan Svojanovsky +2
    EcoEvoRxivPreprintPublisher termsFull textPlant biologyEcoEvoRxiv
  5. A MADS51 allele is associated with flowering-time divergence and contributes to ecological adaptation during wild rice speciation
    Hong-Xiang Zhang, Jing-Dan Han, Yu-Qing Li +10
    Cell ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textPlant biologyCrossref
BibTeX
@article{ifon2026cichlid,
  title = {{Cichlid trophic morphology in the Cross River reflects ecological adaptation to diverse feeding strategies and habitat conditions}},
  author = {Honor T. Ifon and Oluwaseyi O. Famoofo},
  journal = {Journal of Basic and Applied Zoology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1186/s41936-026-00668-1},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s41936-026-00668-1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Cichlid trophic morphology in the Cross River reflects ecological adaptation to diverse feeding strategies and habitat conditions
AU  - Honor T. Ifon
AU  - Oluwaseyi O. Famoofo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/25
JO  - Journal of Basic and Applied Zoology
DO  - 10.1186/s41936-026-00668-1
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s41936-026-00668-1
AB  - Objective This study investigated the ecomorphological variation and trophic specialization of cichlid species in the Cross River, Nigeria, to understand how morphology, diet, and habitat interact to drive ecological diversity. Methodology Eight cichlid species were sampled from three sections of the Cross River (upper, middle, and lower reaches). Morphometric traits (e.g., standard length, gut length, gape width) were measured and analyzed using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Discriminant Function Analysis (DFA). Stomach content analysis was conducted to assess dietary composition, and trophic guilds were defined. Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) was used to explore relationships between morphology, diet, and environmental variables such as dissolved oxygen, substrate type, and vegetation cover. Results Morphometric traits differed significantly among species, with Oreochromis niloticus having the highest standard length (145.2 mm) and Sarotherodon melanotheron exhibiting the longest gut length (190.2 mm). PCA revealed that PC1 explained 47.8% of total variance, primarily influenced by standard length and body depth, while DFA showed a 65.1% separation among species based on trophic traits (Wilks’ λ = 0.324, p < 0.001). Diet analysis revealed that detritus (IRI = 6590.4) and algae (IRI = 3128.3) were dominant food items. Trophic guild classification identified omnivores, herbivores, insectivores, and detritivores, with omnivores showing the highest niche breadth (Levins’ index = 0.68) and trophic overlap (mean Pianka’s index = 0.74). CCA explained 68.5% of the variance in diet-morphology-environment relationships, confirming that species distributions were linked to environmental gradients and feeding adaptations. Conclusion Cichlid trophic morphology in the Cross River reflects ecological adaptation to diverse feeding strategies and habitat conditions. Morphological traits are strong predictors of diet and guild membership, and environmental factors further shape their ecological roles. These findings advance our understanding of functional diversity in African freshwater ecosystems and provide a reference point for biodiversity conservation in tropical riverine habitats.
SN  - 2090-990X
SN  - 2090-9896
ER  -