Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,460 studies31 sourcesUpdated 17 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Neurology

Post-acute traumatic brain injury recovery: architecture of an illustrative curated evidence registry

  1. 1Department of Neurosurgery, Tiantai People’s Hospital of Zhejiang Province (Tiantai Branch of Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital)

Abstract

Introduction: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) recovery is shaped by secondary neuroinflammatory and neurovascular responses, injury severity, pre-injury health, rehabilitation timing and care setting. Yet rehabilitation evidence is commonly organized around interventions rather than the clinical decision context in which an intervention is considered.

Methods: We developed TBI-RECOVER to describe the architecture of a curated post-acute TBI recovery evidence registry across clinical decision-context signals, recovery domains, outcomes, care settings and nominal source roles. English-language PubMed records from database inception to 21 August 2026 were retrieved through seven complementary recovery-oriented search strands. Exact queries, PMIDs, XML metadata, retrieval failures and rule-based triage decisions were archived. An illustrative 50-source curated registry of guidelines, consensus documents and high-level evidence syntheses was assembled from returned records. Each entry received a primary recovery domain, a nominal source-role category, severity, recovery-time, care-setting, age and comorbidity reporting signals, and one or more outcome labels. Selection rationales were recorded for every entry; no numerical domain quota was used.

Results: The curated registry comprised 50 sources after title/abstract and multidisciplinary re-audit: 10 guidelines or consensus documents, 16 intervention syntheses, 10 implementation or service-evidence sources, 13 measurement or prognostic-evidence sources and one protocol or methods source. Forty-six entries occupied the score 12 or higher triage stratum. Independent stratified manual relevance validation confirmed the original triage assignments, and multidisciplinary review confirmed the prespecified source-role and primary-domain classifications. The stored score was reproduced exactly for all 2,529 parsed records. Age language was absent in 23 sources, and no molecular/biochemical marker, cell-type or brain-region signal was present in the curated title/abstract metadata.

Discussion: TBI-RECOVER provides a transparent structure for locating high-level recovery evidence, specifying clinical decision-context fields for future synthesis, and designing stratified rehabilitation and implementation studies.

Related

  1. Tuberculous discitis following traumatic intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin treatment: illustrative case
    Ishan R. Perera, Sydney E. Moriarty, Jaret S. Ly +2
    Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessonsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Be aware of the tuft of hair: traumatic lumbar intradural hematoma following spinal anesthesia in a case of occult spinal dysraphism. Illustrative case
    Abhishek Patil, Vinayak Pillai
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Case LessonsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMCEurope PMC
  3. Recovery of oculomotor nerve palsy following Woven EndoBridge treatment for a symptomatic basilar artery–superior cerebellar artery junction aneurysm: illustrative case
    Yuji Agawa, Taketo Hatano
    Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessonsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Using an enhanced recovery pathway for traumatic rib fractures.
    Valentine S Alia, Shariq Raza
    Trauma surgery & acute care openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  5. Predicting walking recovery after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury with machine learning: a multicenter cohort study
    Shangsong Yang, Wu Zhou, Hao Wan +6
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossref
BibTeX
@article{cao2026postacute,
  title = {{Post-acute traumatic brain injury recovery: architecture of an illustrative curated evidence registry}},
  author = {Fangchuan Cao and Liangdie Xu and Weiyang Wang and Ting Yu and Guangda Xu},
  journal = {Frontiers in Neurology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fneur.2026.1979438},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2026.1979438/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Post-acute traumatic brain injury recovery: architecture of an illustrative curated evidence registry
AU  - Fangchuan Cao
AU  - Liangdie Xu
AU  - Weiyang Wang
AU  - Ting Yu
AU  - Guangda Xu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/19
JO  - Frontiers in Neurology
DO  - 10.3389/fneur.2026.1979438
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2026.1979438/full
AB  - Introduction: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) recovery is shaped by secondary neuroinflammatory and neurovascular responses, injury severity, pre-injury health, rehabilitation timing and care setting. Yet rehabilitation evidence is commonly organized around interventions rather than the clinical decision context in which an intervention is considered.  Methods: We developed TBI-RECOVER to describe the architecture of a curated post-acute TBI recovery evidence registry across clinical decision-context signals, recovery domains, outcomes, care settings and nominal source roles. English-language PubMed records from database inception to 21 August 2026 were retrieved through seven complementary recovery-oriented search strands. Exact queries, PMIDs, XML metadata, retrieval failures and rule-based triage decisions were archived. An illustrative 50-source curated registry of guidelines, consensus documents and high-level evidence syntheses was assembled from returned records. Each entry received a primary recovery domain, a nominal source-role category, severity, recovery-time, care-setting, age and comorbidity reporting signals, and one or more outcome labels. Selection rationales were recorded for every entry; no numerical domain quota was used.  Results: The curated registry comprised 50 sources after title/abstract and multidisciplinary re-audit: 10 guidelines or consensus documents, 16 intervention syntheses, 10 implementation or service-evidence sources, 13 measurement or prognostic-evidence sources and one protocol or methods source. Forty-six entries occupied the score 12 or higher triage stratum. Independent stratified manual relevance validation confirmed the original triage assignments, and multidisciplinary review confirmed the prespecified source-role and primary-domain classifications. The stored score was reproduced exactly for all 2,529 parsed records. Age language was absent in 23 sources, and no molecular/biochemical marker, cell-type or brain-region signal was present in the curated title/abstract metadata.  Discussion: TBI-RECOVER provides a transparent structure for locating high-level recovery evidence, specifying clinical decision-context fields for future synthesis, and designing stratified rehabilitation and implementation studies.
SN  - 1664-2295
ER  -