Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 11 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Agentic research is oxymoronic

Abstract

The use of agentic large language models obviates human interpretation of scientific results, and will lead to substantial distrust in the literature.

Versions

Related

  1. Agentic Systems for Calibrating Cosmological Simulations
    Chaipat Tirapongprasert, Matthew Ho
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
  2. The Agentic Observer Hackathon: Autonomous Decision-making in Simulated Astronomical Surveys
    Haosong Wang, Ting Tan, Yao Li +7
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
  3. An agentic framework for gravitational-wave counterpart association in the multi-messenger era
    Yiming Dong, Yacheng Kang, Junjie Zhao +3
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textInstrumentation & methodsGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  4. Discovery of Interpretable Surrogates via Agentic AI: Application to Gravitational Waves
    Tousif Islam, Digvijay Wadekar, Tejaswi Venumadhav +4
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textHigh-energy astrophysicsGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  5. Agentic AI for Gravitational Wave Data Analysis: A Head-to-Head Comparison of Coding Agents Executing a Matched Filter Pipeline on Einstein Telescope Simulated Data
    Gianluca Inguglia
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{hogg2026agentic,
  title = {{Agentic research is oxymoronic}},
  author = {Natalie B. Hogg},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.31161},
  eprint = {2608.31161},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.31161},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Agentic research is oxymoronic
AU  - Natalie B. Hogg
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/31
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.31161
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.31161
AB  - The use of agentic large language models obviates human interpretation of scientific results, and will lead to substantial distrust in the literature.
ER  -