Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 25 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Clinical Medicine

Long-Term Outcomes and Risk Factors for Treatment Failure After Internal Fixation of Femoral Neck Fractures: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study

  1. 1Peking University Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing 100083, China
  2. 2Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100035, China

Abstract

Objectives: We sought to characterize long-term outcomes following internal fixation of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in a consecutive cohort and to examine factors related to treatment failure. Methods: The study comprised 427 consecutive patients treated with internal fixation for FNFs at Beijing Jishuitan Hospital during 2017. Long-term outcomes were assessed through medical-record review, available routine imaging, and telephone follow-up during the fifth postoperative year. The primary long-term outcomes were osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) and major reoperation. Risk factor analysis was performed in 234 patients with radiographic follow-up of ≥6 months, in whom treatment failure was defined as a composite of ONFH, major reoperation, malunion, nonunion, and/or fixation failure. Associations between candidate factors and treatment failure were examined using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Results: Long-term outcome status was successfully ascertained in 373 of 427 patients (87.4%), corresponding to a loss-to-follow-up rate of 12.6%. Overall, 98 patients (26.3%) developed ONFH and 57 (15.3%) underwent major reoperation, all of which were hip arthroplasties. Among the 234 patients with radiographic follow-up, 111 (47.4%) experienced treatment failure. In the multivariable analysis, high-energy injury (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.90, 95% CI 1.06–7.92), displaced fracture (aOR 12.03, 95% CI 4.33–33.40), subcapital fracture location (aOR 2.14, 95% CI 1.04–4.41), and fair-to-poor reduction quality (aOR 3.95, 95% CI 1.88–8.31) were independently associated with treatment failure. In exploratory age-stratified analyses, fracture displacement and fair-to-poor reduction quality remained consistently associated with treatment failure in both age groups. Conclusions: This consecutive real-world cohort achieved long-term outcome ascertainment in 87.4% of the original population. Long-term complications after internal fixation of FNFs remained substantial. Fracture displacement and fair-to-poor reduction quality were the most consistent factors associated with treatment failure across the primary and exploratory age-stratified analyses, emphasizing the importance of careful treatment selection and adequate fracture reduction.

Related

  1. Outcomes of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Pediatric Lateral Condyle Fractures of Humerus with Delayed Presentation.
    Ashok Kumar, Sandeep Kumar, Dhruv Gupta +2
    Journal of orthopaedic case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  2. Comparison of short- to mid-term outcomes between DAA hemiarthroplasty and PFNA internal fixation in elderly patients with trochanteric fractures: a propensity score-matched retrospective study
    Yanfeng Jia, Liqun Xu, Hongwei Bao +2
    Frontiers in SurgeryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaDOAJEurope PMC
  3. Double Tension Band Wiring Versus Plating for Internal Fixation of Distal Humeral Fractures
    Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviewsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  4. Arthroscopic versus open reduction and internal fixation for tibial plateau fractures: a meta-analysis
    Ming Lai, Zelin Huang, Wei Zhao +3
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMC
  5. Utilization of Billing Codes for Complexity in Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures.
    Jessica I Billig, Yixin Tang, Jennifer R Cardin +3
    Hand (New York, N.Y.)Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{chen2026longterm,
  title = {{Long-Term Outcomes and Risk Factors for Treatment Failure After Internal Fixation of Femoral Neck Fractures: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study}},
  author = {Shuo Chen and Shangwei Ji and Haohao Xu and Renwei Cao and Yujiang Mao and Yejun Zha and Maoqi Gong and Xieyuan Jiang},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.3390/jcm15218656},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8656},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Long-Term Outcomes and Risk Factors for Treatment Failure After Internal Fixation of Femoral Neck Fractures: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study
AU  - Shuo Chen
AU  - Shangwei Ji
AU  - Haohao Xu
AU  - Renwei Cao
AU  - Yujiang Mao
AU  - Yejun Zha
AU  - Maoqi Gong
AU  - Xieyuan Jiang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/06
JO  - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm15218656
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8656
AB  - Objectives: We sought to characterize long-term outcomes following internal fixation of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in a consecutive cohort and to examine factors related to treatment failure. Methods: The study comprised 427 consecutive patients treated with internal fixation for FNFs at Beijing Jishuitan Hospital during 2017. Long-term outcomes were assessed through medical-record review, available routine imaging, and telephone follow-up during the fifth postoperative year. The primary long-term outcomes were osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) and major reoperation. Risk factor analysis was performed in 234 patients with radiographic follow-up of ≥6 months, in whom treatment failure was defined as a composite of ONFH, major reoperation, malunion, nonunion, and/or fixation failure. Associations between candidate factors and treatment failure were examined using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Results: Long-term outcome status was successfully ascertained in 373 of 427 patients (87.4%), corresponding to a loss-to-follow-up rate of 12.6%. Overall, 98 patients (26.3%) developed ONFH and 57 (15.3%) underwent major reoperation, all of which were hip arthroplasties. Among the 234 patients with radiographic follow-up, 111 (47.4%) experienced treatment failure. In the multivariable analysis, high-energy injury (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.90, 95% CI 1.06–7.92), displaced fracture (aOR 12.03, 95% CI 4.33–33.40), subcapital fracture location (aOR 2.14, 95% CI 1.04–4.41), and fair-to-poor reduction quality (aOR 3.95, 95% CI 1.88–8.31) were independently associated with treatment failure. In exploratory age-stratified analyses, fracture displacement and fair-to-poor reduction quality remained consistently associated with treatment failure in both age groups. Conclusions: This consecutive real-world cohort achieved long-term outcome ascertainment in 87.4% of the original population. Long-term complications after internal fixation of FNFs remained substantial. Fracture displacement and fair-to-poor reduction quality were the most consistent factors associated with treatment failure across the primary and exploratory age-stratified analyses, emphasizing the importance of careful treatment selection and adequate fracture reduction.
SN  - 2077-0383
ER  -